Signal-apparition simultaneous source acquisition: Results from a penta-source towed marine test

Author(s):  
Patrick Charron ◽  
Lucio Di-Pietro ◽  
Jean Luc Gomes ◽  
Phil Fontana ◽  
Gary Winfield ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weilin Huang ◽  
Runqiu Wang ◽  
Xiangbo Gong ◽  
Yangkang Chen

Geophysics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. A9-A12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kees Wapenaar ◽  
Joost van der Neut ◽  
Jan Thorbecke

Deblending of simultaneous-source data is usually considered to be an underdetermined inverse problem, which can be solved by an iterative procedure, assuming additional constraints like sparsity and coherency. By exploiting the fact that seismic data are spatially band-limited, deblending of densely sampled sources can be carried out as a direct inversion process without imposing these constraints. We applied the method with numerically modeled data and it suppressed the crosstalk well, when the blended data consisted of responses to adjacent, densely sampled sources.


Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. V281-V293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Zhao ◽  
Qizhen Du ◽  
Xufei Gong ◽  
Xiangyang Li ◽  
Liyun Fu ◽  
...  

Simultaneous source acquisition has attracted more and more attention from geophysicists because of its cost savings, whereas it also brings some challenges that have never been addressed before. Deblending of simultaneous source data is usually considered as an underdetermined inverse problem, which can be effectively solved with a least-squares (LS) iterative procedure between data consistency ([Formula: see text]-norm) and regularization ([Formula: see text]-norm or [Formula: see text]-norm). However, when it comes to abnormal noise that follows non-Gaussian distribution and possesses high-amplitude features (e.g., erratic noise, swell noise, and power line noise), the [Formula: see text]-norm is a nonrobust statistic that can easily lead to suboptimal deblended results. Although abnormal noise can be attenuated in the common source domain at first, it is still challenging to apply a coherency-based filter due to the sparse receiver or crossline sampling, e.g., that commonly found in ocean bottom node (OBN) acquisition. To address this problem, we have developed a normalized shaping regularization to make the inversion-based deblending approach robust for the separation of blended data when abnormal noise exists. Its robustness comes from the normalized shaping operator defined by the confidence interval of normal distribution, which minimizes the abnormal risk to a normal level to satisfy the assumption of LS shaping regularization. In special cases, the proposed approach will revert to the classic LS shaping regularization once the normalized coefficient is large enough. Experimental results on synthetic and field data indicate that the proposed method can effectively restore the separated records from blended data at essentially the same convergence rate as the LS shaping regularization for the abnormal noise-free scenario, but it can obtain better deblending performance and less energy leakage when abnormal noise exists.


2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhong Jingshan ◽  
Lei Tian ◽  
Justin Dauwels ◽  
Laura Waller

Geophysics ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. V1-V11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Ibrahim ◽  
Mauricio D. Sacchi

We adopted the robust Radon transform to eliminate erratic incoherent noise that arises in common receiver gathers when simultaneous source data are acquired. The proposed robust Radon transform was posed as an inverse problem using an [Formula: see text] misfit that is not sensitive to erratic noise. The latter permitted us to design Radon algorithms that are capable of eliminating incoherent noise in common receiver gathers. We also compared nonrobust and robust Radon transforms that are implemented via a quadratic ([Formula: see text]) or a sparse ([Formula: see text]) penalty term in the cost function. The results demonstrated the importance of incorporating a robust misfit functional in the Radon transform to cope with simultaneous source interferences. Synthetic and real data examples proved that the robust Radon transform produces more accurate data estimates than least-squares and sparse Radon transforms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document