scholarly journals Education Act 1981: Monitoring the application of the Education Act 1981 in its first year in operation

1984 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-14 ◽  

The Section of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry wish to monitor the way the Act is working in its first year. It would seem appropriate to do this through the College's Regional Representatives. It is suggested that all consultants should make a note of cases where the Education Act is applied. At the end of May 1984 it would be helpful if all consultants summarized their experiences in terms of numbers of cases and any problems that may have been encountered. Cases where the application of the Act was successful and smooth should also be noted in order that we can develop a code of good practice.

2021 ◽  
pp. 135910452110481
Author(s):  
Simon R. Wilkinson

The scientific basis for practice in child psychiatry has developed apace. And has thrown up several quandries for an accepted paradigm for good practice anchored to the diagnostic schema developed in adult psychiatry. This paper hopes to stimulate discussion about where alternative paradigms might lead us on a path to precision medicine as applied to child psychiatry.


1986 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-8
Author(s):  
Christopher Wardle

The Education Act (1981) was brought into effect on 1 September 1983. Explanatory and guidance documents were published in 1983. The Education Act has effects on the work of child and adolescent psychiatrists in two ways. Firstly it affects those in-patient and day units that have education on the premises. Secondly it affects the placement of children who have special educational needs because of emotional or behavioural problems, the children who in the past would have been deemed maladjusted. While child psychiatrists should be involved in all cases where emotional and behavioural problems are the main issue, they will also be involved with some of the children who have special educational needs because of intellectual and learning difficulties, children who in the past were deemed educationally subnormal. These children between them constitute a high proportion of those who will, under the new Act, be subjects of statements of need.


2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 262-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorthea Juul ◽  
Sandra B. Sexson ◽  
Beth Ann Brooks ◽  
Eugene V. Beresin ◽  
Donald W. Bechtold ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Studies across a range of specialties have consistently yielded positive associations between performance on in-training examinations and board certification examinations, supporting the use of the in-training examination as a valuable formative feedback tool for residents and residency programs. That association to date, however, has not been tested in child and adolescent psychiatry residents. Objective This is the first study to explore the relationship between performance on the American College of Psychiatrists' Child Psychiatry Resident In-Training Examination (CHILD PRITE) and subsequent performance on the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology's (ABPN) subspecialty multiple-choice examination (Part I) in child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP). Methods Pearson correlation coefficients were used to examine the relationship between performance on the CHILD PRITE and the CAP Part I examination for 342 fellows. Results Second-year CAP fellows performed significantly better on the CHILD PRITE than did the first-year fellows. The correlation between the CHILD PRITE total score and the CAP Part I examination total score was .41 (P  =  .01) for first-year CAP fellows; it was .52 (P  =  .01) for second-year CAP fellows. Conclusions The significant correlations between scores on the 2 tests show they assess the same achievement domain. This supports the use of the CHILD PRITE as a valid measure of medical knowledge and formative feedback tool in child and adolescent psychiatry.


PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 52 (43) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marios Constantinou ◽  
Margarita Kapsou ◽  
Maria Karekla

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document