Early intervention in psychosis

1998 ◽  
Vol 172 (S33) ◽  
pp. 53-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Birchwood ◽  
Pauline Todd ◽  
Chris Jackson

Background We consider the evidence for the proposition that the early phase of psychosis (including the period of untreated psychosis) is a critical period' in which (a) long-term outcome is predictable, and (b) biological, psychological and psychosocial influences are developing and show maximum plasticity.Method First-episode prospective studies, predictors of outcome and the genesis of patients' key appraisals of their psychosis are reviewed.Results The data support the notion of the ‘plateau effect’, first coined by Tom McGlashan, which suggested that where deterioration occurs, it does so aggressively in the first 2-3 years; and that critical psychosocial influences, including family and psychological reactions to psychosis and psychiatric services, develop during this period.Conclusions The early phase of psychosis presents important opportunities for secondary prevention. We outline a prototype of intervention appropriate to the critical period. The data challenge the widely held assumption that first-episode psychosis is a benign illness posing little risk.

2010 ◽  
Vol 196 (5) ◽  
pp. 372-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Gafoor ◽  
Dorothea Nitsch ◽  
Paul McCrone ◽  
Tom K. J. Craig ◽  
Philippa A. Garety ◽  
...  

BackgroundEarly specialised care may improve short-term outcome in first-episode non-affective psychosis, but it is unclear if these benefits endure.AimsTo assess the long-term effect of early intervention in psychosis.MethodIndividuals with first-episode psychosis were randomised to specialised care or care as usual (trial number: ISRCTN73679874). Outcome after 5 years was assessed by case-note review.ResultsThere were no significant differences in the admission rate (coefficient 0.096, 95% CI −0.550 to 0.742, P = 0.770) or the mean number of bed days (coefficient 6.344, 95% CI −46 to 58.7, P = 0.810).ConclusionsThese findings that specialist intervention did not markedly improved outcome at 5 years accord with those from a larger OPUS study. The sample size of this study was small and these results should be generalised with caution. More research is needed.


2010 ◽  
Vol 117 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 514
Author(s):  
Amresh Shrivastava ◽  
Megan E. Johnston ◽  
Nilesh Shah ◽  
Meghana Thakar ◽  
Larry Stitt

2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 1447-1456 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. White ◽  
J. Stirling ◽  
R. Hopkins ◽  
J. Morris ◽  
L. Montague ◽  
...  

BackgroundPredictors of outcome for psychosis are poorly understood. Duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) appears to predict short-term outcome although its medium- to long-term role remains unclear. Neurodevelopmental indices such as pre-morbid function and/or neurological soft signs may predict longer-term outcome. We aimed to assess the impact of a range of clinical and demographic variables on long-term outcome of a geographically defined, epidemiological first-episode psychosis cohort.MethodA 10-year follow-up was undertaken of a consecutively presenting sample of 109 cases of first-episode psychosis aged 16–50 years. Baseline assessments included positive, negative and depression symptoms, DUP, neurological soft signs and pre-morbid functioning. Multi-dimensional outcomes were assessed blind to baseline data.ResultsAll participants were traced at a mean of 10.5 years post-index admission: 11 had died, 10 from non-natural causes. Of the surviving cases, 70% were comprehensively re-assessed by interview. Summary data on the remainder were collected from their family practitioner and chart review. Poor 10-year outcomes were predicted independently by poor pre-morbid functioning, baseline negative symptoms and longer DUP. The same measures, plus neurological soft signs, appeared to predict outcomes in a DSM-IV schizophrenia/schizo-affective subgroup.ConclusionsPoor pre-morbid functioning, baseline symptoms, DUP and neurological soft signs at onset independently predict poor long-term outcome in first-episode psychosis.


2008 ◽  
Vol 102 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
Lisa Henry ◽  
G.P. Amminger ◽  
M. Harris ◽  
H.P. Yuen ◽  
S. Harrigan ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashok K. Malla ◽  
Ross M. G. Norman ◽  
Derek J. Scholten ◽  
Sandra Zirul ◽  
Vinod Kotteda

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document