Phase II randomized trial comparing high-dose cisplatin with moderate-dose cisplatin and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. European Lung Cancer Working Party.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 353-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
J P Sculier ◽  
J Klastersky ◽  
V Giner ◽  
G Bureau ◽  
J Thiriaux ◽  
...  

PURPOSE A phase II randomized trial was conducted in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine if the combination of moderate-dose cisplatin and carboplatin was active (primary end point) and could avoid the long-term limiting (renal, auditive, neurologic) toxicity of high-dose cisplatin, which prevents prolonged administration (secondary end point). PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred twenty-one patients, registered between April 1990 and September 1991, were randomized to receive high-dose cisplatin (120 mg/m2 intravenously [IV] on day 1) or a combination of moderate-dose carboplatin (200 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and moderate-dose cisplatin (30 mg/m2 IV on days 2 and 3). One hundred nine patients were eligible: 56 in the cisplatin arm and 53 in the combined arm; 52 and 47, respectively, were assessable for response. All had stage IV disease (or stage IIIB with pleural effusion) and none had received prior chemotherapy. RESULTS There was a 23% objective response rate to cisplatin (23% of the eligible patients) and a 22% response rate to cisplatin plus carboplatin (21% of the eligible patients). The overall survival rate was not significantly different between the two study arms, but responders in the combined arm survived significantly longer than those in the high-dose cisplatin arm (respective median survival durations, 66 and 30 weeks). Although there was no difference between the arms for alopecia, emesis, and leukopenia, the combined arm was significantly associated with more thrombocytopenia (although rarely severe) and, more importantly, with less renal (19% v 36%), auditive (4% v 16%), and neurologic (0% v 16%) toxicity of any grade. CONCLUSION The regimen combining moderate-dose cisplatin and carboplatin was active against advanced NSCLC and significantly less toxic than high-dose cisplatin.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 1388-1396 ◽  
Author(s):  
J P Sculier ◽  
M Paesmans ◽  
J Thiriaux ◽  
J Lecomte ◽  
G Bureau ◽  
...  

PURPOSE A phase III randomized trial in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was performed to determine if the addition of ifosfamide to moderate-dose cisplatin and carboplatin improved response rate (primary end point) and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 529 patients were randomized to receive a combination of moderate-dose carboplatin (200 mg/m2 intravenously [i.v.] on day 1) and cisplatin (30 mg/m2 i.v. on days 2 and 3) with (CCI arm) or without (CC arm) ifosfamide (1.5 g/m2 i.v. on days 1 to 3). There were 248 eligible patients on the CC arm and 257 on the CCI arm, with 220 and 238 patients assessable for response, respectively. All but 23 had stage IV disease with pleural effusion. RESULTS There was a 16% objective response (OR) rate to CC and a 31% OR rate to CCI. That observed difference was highly statistically significant (P < 0.001). Duration of response and survival were not statistically different between arms. The CCI regimen was associated with significantly more acute toxicities: emesis, alopecia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia. The frequency of chronic renal, auditive, and peripheral neurologic toxicity was low in both arms (4.6% and 6.6%, respectively, after six courses of chemotherapy). The relative dose-intensity (RDI) of the CCI arm was significantly lower than that of the CC arm. CONCLUSION The addition of ifosfamide to moderate-dose cisplatin and carboplatin significantly improves the antitumoral response rate, but has no apparent effect an survival in advanced NSCLC.


1985 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
H M Dhingra ◽  
M Valdivieso ◽  
D T Carr ◽  
D F Chiuten ◽  
P Farha ◽  
...  

One hundred sixty-seven evaluable patients with non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive high-dose cisplatin and vindesine (PVD), or cisplatin and VP-16-213 (etoposide epipodophyllotoxin) (PVP), or cisplatin with VP-16-213 and vindesine (PVPVD). The patient distribution and characteristics were similar in all the treatment arms. The response rate differences (35% in PVD arm, 30% in PVP arm, and 22% in PVPVD arm) were not statistically significant (P = .33). Response durations were 43 weeks in the PVD arm, 20 weeks in the PVP arm, and 27 weeks in the PVPVD arm. Median survival was 29 weeks in the PVD and PVP arms and 28 weeks in the PVPVD arm. Median survival time of responding patients was 76 weeks in the PVD arm and 65 weeks in the PVP arm; 78% of patients were alive at 22+ to 87+ weeks follow-up in the PVPVD arm. Myelosuppression was similar in all three treatment arms. Significantly more azotemia occurred in the PVD arm than in the PVP and PVPVD arms (P = .002), and significantly more neuropathy in the PVD and PVPVD arms than in the PVP arm (P = .003 and .005). All the treatment arms have similar antitumor activity in non-small-cell lung cancer, but the PVP combination is slightly less toxic than the PVD and PVPVD treatment arms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document