Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of uterine cervix: The Scottish experience

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15026-15026
Author(s):  
M. Siva ◽  
R. Mahmood ◽  
S. Kakumanu ◽  
A. Sadozye ◽  
N. Reed

15026 Background: Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCC) of uterine cervix is a rare sub-type of cervical cancer. We report the results of a retrospective analysis of data from 2 Scottish centres of cases of SCC of cervix. The aim is to examine therapeutic interventions, relapse patterns and survival. Methods: Eligible cases were patients (pts) with cervical SCC presented for management discussion between 1995 and 2005 in the 2 scottish centres. Pathology was reviewed centrally by the network pathologists. We reviewed pts case records for staging information, therapeutic interventions, median time to relapse, salvage therapy and responses and overall survival. Results: A total of 21 pts were eligible for the analysis (Glasgow-13 and Aberdeen-8). The median age of the pts was 33 (Range 22–74). Nine pts were FIGO stage 1B, 3 were 2A and 4 were 2B, 3 were 3B and 2 with metastatic disease. Surgery was done in 13 pts [11-radical hysterectomy/pelvic lymphadenectomy, 1-radical hyseterctomy and 1-total abdominal hysterectomy]. Chemotherapy was given to 16 pts [Neo-adjuvant-6, Adjuvant-9, Concurrent-3]. Fourteen pts received combination chemotherapy containing Platinum and Etoposide [EP-2, CE-8, ICE-1 and ACE-3]. One received non-platinum combination. Fourteen pts received radiotherapy [10-Pelvic radiotherapy and brachytherapy, 3-Pelvic only, 1-Brachytherapy only, 2-PCI]. Two pts died of progressive disease shortly after diagnosis without any specific anti-cancer treatment, two pts were disease free after a follow up of 40 and 53 months respectively and one was lost to follow up 7 yrs after diagnosis. Median relapse free survival (RFS) was 16 months. Two year RFS was 25%. The sites of relapse were as follows: Liver-4, Chest-4, Para-aortic-4, Brain-3, Neck-3, Local-2, Abdomen-1. Twelve pts received salvage therapy after relapse [5-responded, 2-not assessed and 5-progressed]. Seven pts were alive after a median follow up of 40 months [Range 17–90]. Median survival was 28 months and the three year overall survival was 45%. Conclusions: We have shown here that with combination treatment SCC can be effectively managed with occasional durable remissions. The overall survival at 3 years was 45%. We believe this was the result of aggressive combination therapy of surgery, chemo and radiotherapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoru Munakata ◽  
Emi Iwai ◽  
Tomohito Tanaka ◽  
Michihiko Nakamura ◽  
Takayoshi Kanda

Malignant Müllerian mixed tumors (MMMTs) of the uterine cervix are extremely rare, accounting for 0.005% of all cervical malignancies. To date, only approximately 50 well-documented cases have been reported. Although several epithelial components have been described in cervical MMMTs, small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCC) has not appeared in the English literature. We present a 43-year-old woman, para 2 gravida 2, who had MMMT with SCC and rhabdomyosarcoma components in the uterine cervix. She was referred to our hospital because of a cervical mass with an abnormal Pap smear result. Cervical biopsy revealed SCC. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy with balloon-occluded arterial infusion, she underwent type II radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Histological analysis revealed that the cervical tumor comprised SCC and rhabdomyosarcoma components. Genotype analysis indicated human papillomavirus type 18. She underwent concurrent chemoradiation therapy. The patient had been free of the disease and showed no evidence of recurrence 38 months after operation.


2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuki R. Kataoka ◽  
Yoshitane Tsukamoto ◽  
Makiko Matsumura ◽  
Asako Miyake ◽  
Shoji Kamiura ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18015-e18015
Author(s):  
Jinluan Li ◽  
Limei Lin ◽  
Zongkai Zhang ◽  
Yunxia Huang ◽  
Qin Lin

e18015 Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of treatment modality to survival outcome in small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix (SCNEC) using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Methods: We identified patients with SCNEC from the SEER program during 1981 to 2014and analyzed significant factors for cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall (OS) using Kaplan–Meier survival and Cox regression proportional hazard methods. Results: A total of 503 SCNEC patients were identified. The median follow- up time was 31 months. The 5-year cause specific survival and overall survival were 36.6% and 30.6%, respectively. The FIGO stages I to IV distributions were 189(37.6%), 108 (21.4%),95 (18.9%), and 111 patients (22.1%), respectively. Of the patients with known local treatment strategies, 177 patients (45.9%) were treated with radical surgery and 209 (54.1%) patients underwent primary radiotherapy. In multivariate analysis, local treatment strategies were independent prognostic factors for CSS and OS. The 5- year CSS according to radical surgery and primary radiotherapy were 50.0% and 27.9%, respectively (P < 0.001). The 5-year OS in patients received radical surgery and primary radiotherapy were 57.8%, and 29.6%, respectively (P < 0.001). In FIGO stage I SCNEC, patients treated with radical surgery had superior CSS (P = 0.001) and OS (P = 0.003) than those with primary radiotherapy. However, in FIGO stage II and III SCNEC, there are no differences observed in CSS and OS according to different local treatment strategies. The results also observed that the addition of brachytherapy impact OS (P = 0.002) in FIGO stage III SENCE. The 5-year cause specific survival and overall survival of patients with FIGO IV were only 11.7% and 7.1%, respectively. Conclusions: Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix is a rare disease with aggressive clinical behavior. The results suggested that radical surgery is the optimal local treatment for early-stage SCNEC and combining radiation therapy with brachytherapy should be suitable for patients with advanced stage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document