Chemotherapy use for hormone receptor-positive, node-negative breast cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11004-11004
Author(s):  
M. J. Hassett ◽  
M. E. Hughes ◽  
J. C. Niland ◽  
S. B. Edge ◽  
R. L. Theriault ◽  
...  

11004 Background: High quality evidence has shown that adjuvant chemotherapy (chemo) improves survival for hormone receptor- positive, node negative breast cancer measuring >1 cm (H+/N-/T>1cm BC). Since 2002 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines have recommended chemo for this group. Because the benefit from chemo in this situation is modest there is debate regarding which women, if any, can forego chemo. We describe trends in chemo use and identify factors associated with not receiving chemo for H+/N-/T>1cm BC. Methods: We identified women less than 70 years old with H+/N-/T>1cm BC diagnosed 1997–2004 and treated at 8 NCCN institutions. We analyzed the frequency of chemo use on a yearly basis (chi square). A multivariable logistic regression model assessed the relationship between likelihood of not receiving chemo and year of diagnosis, institution, tumor size, histologic characteristics and socio- demographic variables. We incorporated interaction terms to explore how chemo use varied over time and between institutions. Results: Of 3190 women with H+/N-/T>1cm BC, 56% received chemo. Chemo use was less common for 1.1–2 cm than for >2 cm tumors (48 vs. 83%; p<.01). There was no significant change in chemo use over time, but there was significant variability among institutions (range 47–65%; p<.01). On multivariable analysis, predictors independently associated with not receiving chemo included lower histologic/nuclear grade, non-ductal/lobular histology, absence of lymphovascular invasion or HER2 overexpression, and older age (p<.01 for all). The interaction between institution and year of diagnosis was also significant (p<.01). Over the 2 years following the NCCN guideline’s definitive recommendation for chemo in 2002, the relative change in institutional chemo use ranged from a 25% decrease to a 28% increase. Conclusions: Many women did not receive chemo despite clinical trial evidence. Providers considered molecular features, tumor size and patient age when deciding who should receive chemo. While overall trends in chemo use did not change, use appeared to increase at some institutions and decreased at others after the 2002 guideline recommendation for chemo. This suggests a lack of consensus at NCCN institutions regarding when to administer chemo for H+/N-/T>1cm BC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22011-e22011
Author(s):  
G. Curigliano ◽  
L. Fumagalli ◽  
V. Bagnardi ◽  
N. Rotmensz ◽  
M. Locatelli ◽  
...  

e22011 Background: Prognosis of patients with node-negative, HER2-positive disease and tumor size ≤ 1 cm is a matter of controversy. We assessed the prognostic role of HER2 overexpression/amplification in a large series of patients with node-negative, pT1a,b breast cancers. Methods: All consecutive patients with pT1a,b pN0 M0 HER2-positive breast cancer who underwent surgery at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO) from 1995 to 2006 were identified. No patient received trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting. A matched cohort comparison was done using as variables hormone receptor status (positive vs. negative), age at surgery and year of surgery. Comparison group included patients with HER2-negative breast cancer matched 1:1 for hormone receptor negative group and 1:2 for hormone receptor positive group. We estimated rates of local recurrence, distant metastases, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the hormone receptor positive and hormone receptor negative group. Results: We identified 150 patients with pT1a,b pN0 M0 HER2-positive tumors. The median follow-up was 4.6 years (range 1.0–9.0). In the hormone receptor positive group 5-year DFS was 99% [95% CI: 98%-100%] for HER2-negative and 92% [95% CI: 86%-99%] for HER2-positive disease. In the hormone receptor negative group 5-year DFS was 92% [95% CI: 84%-100%] for HER2-negative and 91% [95% CI: 84%-99%] in HER2-positive disease. Overall, for patients with hormone receptors positive and negative disease, the hazard ratio (HR) associated to HER2 overexpression was 2.4 (95% CI: 0.9–6.5, p=0.09). OS in HER2-positive pT1a,b pN0 M0 breast cancer was similar in hormone receptor positive and negative patients (p=0.93). Conclusions: Node-negative, HER2-positive, pT1a,b breast cancer have a low risk of locoregional and distant recurrence within the first 5 years after diagnosis. In patients with hormone receptor positive, pT1a,b N0 M0 tumors, HER2 overexpression seems to be associated with a dire prognosis (HR=5.2, 95% CI: 1.0–25.9) in terms of DFS. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document