Phase I dose escalation and PK study of thermally sensitive liposomes containing doxorubicin given during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with non-resectable primary and metastatic liver cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15010-15010 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Wood ◽  
R. T. Poon ◽  
Z. Neeman ◽  
M. Eugeni ◽  
J. Locklin ◽  
...  

15010 Purpose: This phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic (PK) study in patients with non-resectable primary or metastatic hepatic tumors undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) uses a 30-minute IV infusion of ThermoDox (TDox) starting 15 minutes prior to RFA treatment. TDox liposomes are engineered to release doxorubicin (Dox) locally at temperatures greater than 39.5 °C. High local concentrations of Dox could allow for increased drug concentration targeted at the tumor margins in an effort to achieve improved local recurrence and tumor control near these RFA-induced thermal lesions. The phase I study goals are to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity of TDox. Patients and Methods: Patients (pts) must be eligible for RFA for primary (HCC) or metastatic liver cancer (MLC). Main inclusion criteria are = 4 lesions and = 7 cm in greatest diameter. Dose escalation is: cohorts of 3–6 pts treated with a single dose of 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 or 70 mg/m2. RFA is administered via percutaneous or surgical approach. RFA treatment without TDox can be repeated for recurrent hepatic (distant or local) tumors. Patients requiring systemic chemotherapy following RFA are removed from the study. MRI, PET and contrast enhanced CT (CE-CT) scans are done pre-, one and three months post-treatment (q3 months thereafter for patients on trial). CE-CT scans are also performed immediately following RFAs. Patients are assessed for safety, PK, and lesion diameters on CT. RFA+TDox lesion diameters will be compared to patients treated by RFA alone (control) at the same institution. Results: A total of 22 pts have been treated as of January 2007 submission date (3, 6, 6, 6, 1 patients at 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 mg/m2, respectively). This population includes 8 pts with HCC and 14 pts with MLC. Grade 3/4 toxicity (reversible neutropenia) has been observed to be dose dependent. 1 patient at 50 mg/m2 has met DLT criteria. Conclusions: TDox has been safely administered in combination with percutaneous or surgical RFA procedures in 22 patients with liver tumors. There has been limited, manageable toxicity thus far. Enrollment continues as the MTD and DLT have yet to be defined. [Table: see text]

1994 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 405-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. G. Feun ◽  
K. R. Reddy ◽  
J. M. Yrizarry ◽  
N. Savaraj ◽  
J. J. Guerra ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 375-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn G. Feun ◽  
K. Rajender Reddy ◽  
Thomas Scagnelli ◽  
Jose M. Yrizarry ◽  
Jorge J. Guerra ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 100-107
Author(s):  
D. V. Sidorov ◽  
S. O. Stepanov ◽  
M. V. Lozhkin ◽  
L. O. Petrov ◽  
O. V. Gutz ◽  
...  

Extensive liver resections are the main method of treatment of patients with primary and metastatic liver cancer, which allows the noticeable prolongation of life. In patients with a reduced functional reserve of the liver or a missing volume of the remaining liver parenchyma, these interventions become impossible because of the increased risk of postresectional acute hepatic insufficiency. One of the most modern and promising ways to overcome this obstacle is the use of minimally invasive methods of tumor destruction. This article presents two observations of the clinical application of the laser ablator “Echolaser X4”: open laser ablation of the metastatic focus with subsequent atypical liver resection and percutaneous laser ablation of the metastasis of the neuroendocrine tumor into the liver. The presented experience testifies to the justification of using laser destruction of metastatic malignant liver tumors and demonstrates the possibilities of laser thermoablation therapy in patients who can not perform radical surgical treatment.


2006 ◽  
Vol 80 ◽  
pp. S19-S20 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Dawson ◽  
M. Hawkins ◽  
C. Eccles ◽  
T. Craig ◽  
J.-P. Bissonnette ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
O. E. Karpov ◽  
P. S. Vetshev ◽  
S. V. Bruslik ◽  
T. I. Sviridova ◽  
A. L. Levchuk ◽  
...  

Material and methods. Ultrasound ablation has been performed in 165 patients with metastatic liver cancer (metastases of colorectal cancer as a rule) and in 17 patients with unresectable pancreatic neoplasms for the period from April 2009 to December 2017. All patients with metastatic liver cancer underwent previous surgery for primary tumor. In 53% of cases unresectable pancreatic tumor was complicated by mechanical jaundice that required biliary drainage and stenting before ablation. Ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT were applied to assess changes of tumor dimensions, its structure compared with initial data, vascularization grade, continued growth or de novo metastases with positive changes within destruction area. Percutaneous biopsy of liver and pancreatic tumors was carried out in 136 patients (75%) to assess morphological changes of tumor in pre- and postoperative period. Results. There were no intra – and postoperative complications. Three types of changes occurring within destruction area were revealed. Positive changes including changes of tumor structure, reduced dimensions and volume were observed in 76 (46%) patients. 38 (23%) patients had either augmentation of dimensions and volume of destruction area or appearance of additional tumor tissue on the periphery of metastasis. De novo liver metastases or other distant ones occurred in 51 (31%) patients with positive changes in destruction area. Oncologists of our center evaluated immediate and long-term outcomes of combined treatment. Reduced tumor dimension on the background of mild or absent pain syndrome were confirmed in 12 (72%) patients after ablation of pancreatic tumor. In 8 out of 12 patients weight gain and absent pain syndrome were observed within 48 months. Conclusion. Ultrasound ablation is effective and safe for local destruction of secondary liver tumors and unresectable pancreatic tumors. This approach is indicated for inoperable cases and as a stage of combined treatment.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (16_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4127-4127 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Hawkins ◽  
C. Eccles ◽  
G. Lockwood ◽  
B. Cummings ◽  
J. Ringash ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 533-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byeong-Ho Park ◽  
Taeho Hwang ◽  
Ta-Chiang Liu ◽  
Daniel Y Sze ◽  
Jae-Seok Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document