Prospective assessment of symptoms and quality of life in localized rectal cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 504-504
Author(s):  
J. M. Herman ◽  
K. A. Griffith ◽  
A. K. Narang ◽  
M. M. Zalupski ◽  
N. S. Azad ◽  
...  

504 Background: Neoadjuvant conformal chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is an important component of treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, yet its morbidity has not been well characterized using quality of life (QOL) instruments. The present study attempts to establish a baseline distribution of QOL scores before, during, and after CRT and to correlate these changes with symptoms. Methods: Patients undergoing 3-4 field neoadjuvant CRT for localized rectal cancer were prospectively enrolled at two institutions. Fifty patients completed the QOL instruments at three time points: pretreatment, week 4 of treatment, and 1 month post-treatment. QOL information was captured using three validated questionnaires, the EORTC QLQ-30, QLQ-38, and QLQ-29. Additionally, institutional symptom inventories and CTCAE toxicity data were collected. Results: Average age was 59.2 years and 72% were men. During CRT, patients had a statistically significant decline in global QOL (70 to 60, p = 0.0024), which normalized (71) following completion of treatment. During therapy, patients also experienced a significant increase in GI symptoms (21 to 27, p = 0.028), urinary symptoms (16 to 30, p < 0.0001), male sexual dysfunction (23 to 34, p = 0.013), and chemotherapy related side effects (8 to 20, p = 0.0001). While these measures returned to baseline 1 month post-CRT, overall sexual function (25 vs. 37, p = 0.0062) and sexual enjoyment (53 vs. 67, p = 0.0070) remained persistently low compared to pretreatment levels. Diarrhea (27%) and proctitis (22%) were the most common grade 3 toxicities. Those patients who experienced grade 3 toxicity during treatment showed markedly decreased global QOL (mean difference = 34). Conclusions: While rectal cancer patients experienced impaired QOL during neoadjuvant CRT, the vast majority of measures normalized one month after treatment. In contrast, significantly decreased sexual function and enjoyment persisted. This data can be used as a baseline to compare future neoadjuvant conformal CRT regimens and/or assess the toxicity and QOL of new RT modalities such as intensity modulated radiation therapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2006 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 423-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Ignacio Arraras Urdaniz ◽  
Fernando Arias de la Vega ◽  
Ruth Vera García ◽  
Ana Manterola Burgaleta ◽  
Maite Martínez Aguillo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15178-e15178
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abdalla ◽  
Amr M. Aref ◽  
Amer Alame ◽  
Danny Ma ◽  
Mohammed Barawi ◽  
...  

e15178 Background: The role of neoadjuvant FOLFOX in achieving clinical downstaging and improvement in quality of life (QOL) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) remains to be established. We are conducting a phase II prospective clinical trial to evaluate the use of six cycles of FOLFOX as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T2-T3/N0-N+ rectal cancer. We now report tumor clinical downstaging and patient-reported QOL in our first patient cohort. Methods: Eleven Patients enrolled in our phase II prospective trial. Patients received three months of FOLFOX (infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) administered every two weeks. After three weeks of recovery, each patient was treated with conventional chemo-radiotherapy (5FU or capecitabine) All patients had an MRI and endorectal ultrasound at baseline and after completion of FOLFOX. A compilation of validated QOL questionnaires were also administered before and after FOLFOX. Results: A total of 11 patients completed the chemotherapy regimen. Based on pelvic MRI, complete clinical response (T0N0) was achieved by seven patients (64%), one patient (9%) was clinically downstaged but three (27%) didn’t have any changes following FOLFOX. Importantly, we found no disease progression during the FOLFOX course. QOL assessment after FOLFOX regimen showed trend towards improvement in general health, mobility, bladder control and psychological health. These changes in QOL were not statistically significant due to the small sample size. Patients self-grading of their general health before starting FOLFOX was 50% compared to 75% after. Of the five patients with pain at time of diagnosis, four reported complete pain relief while the fifth reported improvement from extreme to moderate pain. Three patients reported improvement in their anxiety/depression. In terms of bowel function, although there was trend towards improvement in the urgency subscale, other bowel functions subscales were unchanged. In general, scores for mobility, selfcare, and bladder function were slightly better after FOLFOX. Conclusions: This study suggests that adding only six cycles of neoadjuvant FOLFOX before CRT not only resulted in clinical downstaging of (LARC) but showed a trend toward improved QOL. This result provides some reassurance for oncologists that this approach does not diminish QOL with no risk of disease progression during the time of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These findings need to be validated in a larger phase III trial.


2013 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. e15-e19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph M. Herman ◽  
Amol K. Narang ◽  
Kent A. Griffith ◽  
Mark M. Zalupski ◽  
Jennifer B. Reese ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. S108-S109
Author(s):  
M. Verweij ◽  
S. Hoendervangers ◽  
A. Couwenberg ◽  
M. Burbach ◽  
M. Berbee ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 3109-3117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriella Palmer ◽  
Anna Martling ◽  
Pernilla Lagergren ◽  
Björn Cedermark ◽  
Torbjörn Holm

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document