Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Gemcitabine/Cisplatin Alone or With Sorafenib for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced, Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (25) ◽  
pp. 3084-3092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis G. Paz-Ares ◽  
Bonne Biesma ◽  
David Heigener ◽  
Joachim von Pawel ◽  
Timothy Eisen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Escape Trial ◽  
End Point

Purpose This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of sorafenib plus gemcitabine/cisplatin in chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable stage IIIB to IV nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Between February 2007 and March 2009, 904 patients were randomly assigned to daily sorafenib (400 mg twice a day) or matching placebo plus gemcitabine (1,250 mg/m2 per day on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2 on day 1) for up to six 21-day cycles. Because of safety findings from the Evaluation of Sorafenib, Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Efficacy in NSCLC (ESCAPE) trial, patients with squamous cell histology were withdrawn from the trial in February 2008 and excluded from analysis. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and time-to-progression (TTP). Results The primary analysis population consisted of 772 patients (sorafenib, 385; placebo, 387); the two groups had similar demographic and baseline characteristics. Median OS was similar in the sorafenib and placebo groups (12.4 v 12.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; P = .401). By investigator assessment, sorafenib improved median PFS (6.0 v 5.5 months; HR, 0.83; P = .008) and TTP (6.1 v 5.5 months; HR, 0.73; P < .001). Grade 3 to 4 drug-related adverse events more than two-fold higher in the sorafenib group included hand-foot skin reaction (8.6% v 0.3%), fatigue (7.3% v 3.6%), rash (5.7% v 0.5%), and hypertension (4.2% v 1.8%). No unexpected toxicities were observed. Conclusion This study did not meet its primary end point of improved OS when sorafenib was added to first-line gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. Identification of predictive biomarkers is warranted in future trials of sorafenib.

Cetuximab and First-Line Taxane/Carboplatin Chemotherapy in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of the Randomized Multicenter Phase III Trial BMS099

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 911-917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Lynch ◽  
Taral Patel ◽  
Luke Dreisbach ◽  
Michael McCleod ◽  
William J. Heim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Receptor Expression ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
End Point

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab plus taxane/carboplatin (TC) as first-line treatment of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods This multicenter, open-label, phase III study enrolled 676 chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IIIB (pleural effusion) or IV NSCLC, without restrictions by histology or epidermal growth factor receptor expression. Patients were randomly assigned to cetuximab/TC or TC. TC consisted of paclitaxel (225 mg/m2) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2), at the investigator's discretion, and carboplatin (area under the curve = 6) on day 1 every 3 weeks for ≤ six cycles; cetuximab (400 mg/m2 on day 1, 250 mg/m2 weekly) was administered until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival assessed by independent radiologic review committee (PFS-IRRC); overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), quality of life (QoL), and safety were key secondary end points. PFS and ORR assessed by investigators were also evaluated. Results Median PFS-IRRC was 4.40 months with cetuximab/TC versus 4.24 months with TC (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.902; 95% CI, 0.761 to 1.069; P = .236). Median OS was 9.69 months with cetuximab/TC versus 8.38 months with TC (HR = 0.890; 95% CI, 0.754 to 1.051; P = .169). ORR-IRRC was 25.7% with cetuximab/TC versus 17.2% with TC (P = .007). The safety profile of this combination was manageable and consistent with its individual components. Conclusion The addition of cetuximab to TC did not significantly improve the primary end point, PFS-IRRC. There was significant improvement in ORR by IRRC. The difference in OS favored cetuximab but did not reach statistical significance.

scholarly journals Chemo-immunotherapy as first-line treatment for small-cell lung cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592098036
Author(s):  
Saira Farid ◽  
Stephen V. Liu
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly lethal subtype of lung cancer. Despite concerted efforts over the past several decades, there have been limited therapeutic advances. Traditional chemotherapy offers a high response rate and rapid symptomatic improvement, but its benefit is fleeting, and relapse is quick and unforgiving. Immunotherapy has delivered improved outcomes for patients with many cancers and there was compelling rationale for development in SCLC. While initial efforts with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte protein-4 inhibitors failed to improve upon chemotherapy alone, the addition of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors to first-line chemotherapy finally provided long-awaited gains in survival. Atezolizumab, when added to carboplatin and etoposide, improved both progression-free survival and overall survival. Durvalumab, when added to platinum plus etoposide, similarly improved OS. Biomarker development has stalled as PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden have not been useful predictive biomarkers. However, based on the significant survival improvements, both atezolizumab and durvalumab were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to be given with first-line chemotherapy, and these regimens represent the new standards of care for SCLC.

scholarly journals Randomized, Phase III Trial of First-Line Figitumumab in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Versus Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Alone in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (19) ◽  
pp. 2059-2066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey J. Langer ◽  
Silvia Novello ◽  
Keunchil Park ◽  
Maciej Krzakowski ◽  
Daniel D. Karp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Serious Adverse Events

Purpose Figitumumab (CP-751,871), a fully human immunoglobulin G2 monoclonal antibody, inhibits the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R). Our multicenter, randomized, phase III study compared figitumumab plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent NSCLC disease with nonadenocarcinoma histology received open-label figitumumab (20 mg/kg) plus paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve, 6 mg · min/mL) or paclitaxel and carboplatin alone once every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results Of 681 randomly assigned patients, 671 received treatment. The study was closed early by an independent Data Safety Monitoring Committee because of futility and an increased incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) and treatment-related deaths with figitumumab. Median OS was 8.6 months for figitumumab plus chemotherapy and 9.8 months for chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.40; P = .06); median progression-free survival was 4.7 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 5.4) and 4.6 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 5.4), respectively (HR, 1.10; P = .27); the objective response rates were 33% and 35%, respectively. The respective rates of all-causality SAEs were 66% and 51%; P < .01). Treatment-related grade 5 adverse events were also more common with figitumumab (5% v 1%; P < .01). Conclusion Adding figitumumab to standard chemotherapy failed to increase OS in patients with advanced nonadenocarcinoma NSCLC. Further clinical development of figitumumab is not being pursued.

Result of phase III trial of amrubicin/cisplatin versus etoposide/cisplatin as first-line treatment for extensive small cell lung cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7507-7507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Sun ◽  
Ying Cheng ◽  
Xuezhi Hao ◽  
Jie Wang ◽  
Chengping Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Bone Marrow Failure ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Phase Iii Trial

7507 Background: Etoposide combined with cisplatin (EP) has been the first-line chemotherapy regimen for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) for >20 years; however, a more effective regimen has been recommended by many clinical oncologists. Thus, we here present our preliminary results of a phase III clinical trial of the novel drug amrubicin in combination with cisplatin (AP) in comparison to EP in patients with previously untreated extensive SCLC (ED-SCLC). Methods: A total of 299 previously untreated ED-SCLC patients were randomized (ratio, 1:1) into two treatment groups: (1) the AP group (n = 149): 4–6 cycles of amrubicin (40 mg/m2/day on days 1–3) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2/day on day 1) and (2) the EP group (n = 150): 4–6 cycles of etoposide (100 mg/m2/day on days 1–3) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2/day on day 1 every 21 days). Patients were evaluated for therapy response and electrocardiography results every 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and general safety. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar among the two groups. For AP and EP groups, the median OS was 11.79 and 10.28 months, the median PFS was 7.13 and 6.37 months, and ORR was 69.8% and 57.3%, respectively. The most frequent adverse events (≥grade 3) in AP and EP groups were bone marrow failure (23.5% and 21.3%, respectively), neutropenia (54.4% and 44.0%, respectively), and leukopenia (34.9% and 19.3%, respectively). Conclusions: Our phase III trial demonstrated that for previously untreated ED-SCLC patients, AP therapy was not inferior to EP therapy in terms of OS and offered predictable and manageable toxicities. Clinical trial information: NCT00660504.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document