Safety and efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with malignant peritoneal carcinomatosis induced bowel obstruction.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14012-e14012
Author(s):  
Pankaj G Vashi ◽  
Donald Peter Braun ◽  
Brenten Popiel ◽  
Digant Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Symptom Resolution ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Peg Tube

e14012 Background: Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement in advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis with bowel obstruction is a feasible palliative procedure to help patients with obstructive symptoms. We describe the safety and efficacy of using PEG tube for decompression in patients with large peritoneal masses. Methods: A consecutive case series of 62 patients (Apr-08 to Jun-11) with advanced abdominal carcinomatosis induced bowel obstruction. All patients were extensively treated for their cancer. None of them were surgical candidates due to extensive peritoneal involvement. All patients had symptoms of nausea, vomiting and pain at the time of PEG tube placement. All patients had a 28F (Bard) PEG tube placed for drainage. The primary outcomes of interest were complications and symptom resolution due to PEG tube placement. Frequency of nausea, vomiting and severity of pain was recorded daily in patient charts. Results: 16 were males and 46 females. The mean age was 50.5 years. Most common cancers were ovary, pancreas, colon and stomach. Of 62 patients, 57 patients had expired at the time of this analysis. Of those 57 expired, 49 had PEG tube at the time of death, while 8 had complete resolution of symptoms with PEG tube removed before death. The 5 out of 62 patients who are alive still have the PEG tube for drainage (average 70.4 days). The average duration of PEG tube placement for all patients combined was 70.9 days (range 6-312 days). Relief of nausea, vomiting and pain was observed in 53 (85.5%), 55 (88.7%) and 35 (56.5%) patients respectively. Of a total of 43 patients who had PEG tube placed for >= 30 days, 24 (56%) could continue with their chemotherapy cycles because of symptom resolution. Non life threatening complications of PEG tube placement were observed in 9 (14.5%) patients. 3 had infection at the insertion site, 2 had bleeding and 3 had leaking at the PEG tube site while 1 had aspiration. 6 (9.7%) patients required replacement of the PEG tube due to occlusion. Conclusions: Placement of PEG tube in presence of advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis is safe and effective in relieving obstructive symptoms as well as extending the period of active cancer therapy.

scholarly journals Inadvertent Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement through the Transverse Colon to the Stomach Causing Intractable Diarrhea: A Case Report

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
David T. Burke ◽  
Andrew I. Geller ◽  
Alexios G. Carayannopoulos ◽  
Richard Goldstein
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Transverse Colon ◽  
Delayed Diagnosis ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Common Mechanism ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Peg Tube

Background. Among patients with chronic disease, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are a common mechanism to deliver enteral feedings to patients unable to feed by mouth. While several cases in the literature describe difficulties with and complications of the initial placement of the PEG, few studies have documented the effects of a delayed diagnosis of a misplaced tube. Methods. This case study reviews the hospitalization of an 82 year old male with an inadvertent placement of a PEG tube through the transverse colon. Photos of the placement in the stomach as well as those of the follow up colonoscopy, and a recording of the episodes of diarrhea during the hospitalization were made. Results. The records of this patient reveal complaints of gastrointestinal distress and diarrhea immediately after placement of the tube. Placement in the stomach was verified by endoscopy, with discovery of the tube only after a follow up colonoscopy. The tube remained in place after this discovery, and was removed weeks after the diarrhea was unsuccessfully treated with antibiotics. After tube removal, the patient recovered well and was sent home.

Meningitis Due to Enterobacter aerogenes Subsequent to Resection of Acoustic Neuroma and Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement: A Rare Nosocomial Event

2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 780-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Poetker ◽  
Charles E. Edmiston ◽  
Michelle M. Smith ◽  
Glenn A. Meyer ◽  
Phillip A. Wackym
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Acoustic Neuroma ◽  
Enterobacter Aerogenes ◽  
Intervention Strategies ◽  
Gastrostomy Tube ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Gastrostomy Tube Placement ◽  
Peg Tube

AbstractWe present a case of meningitis after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement subsequent to acoustic neuroma resection and cranioplasty. Four days following PEG tube placement the patient developed Enterobacter aerogenes meningitis, requiring explantation of infected cranioplasty material. His condition subsequently improved. Etiology and future intervention strategies are discussed (Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:780-782).

scholarly journals A case of small-bowel obstruction after insertion of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube due to mesenteric penetration

2015 ◽  
Vol 97 (5) ◽  
pp. e79-e80 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Roos
Keyword(s):  
Small Bowel ◽  
Small Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Gastrostomy Tube ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Direct Injury ◽  
Peg Tube

A case of small-bowel obstruction after insertion of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube is described. At laparotomy, the PEG tube was found to have penetrated the jejunal mesentery at two points, thereby acting as a focus for a volvulus. Direct injury and obstruction to the small bowel have been described but volvulus due to mesenteric penetration has not.

scholarly journals Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Children: Experience from Single Center of a Developing Country

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-131
Author(s):  
Mohit Kehar ◽  
Nishant Wadhwa ◽  
Satyam Upadhyay
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Effective Means ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
P Value ◽  
Average Weight ◽  
Average Height ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Post Procedure ◽  
Peg Tube

Introduction: Nutrition is of paramount importance for adequate growth and development of a child. Various routes of providing enteral nutrition to a paediatric patient are by nasogastric, nasojejeunal and gastrostomy which can be placed surgically or endoscopically. The objectives of this study were to review cases with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) procedure and patient characteristics, indications, complications and outcome of PEG tube insertion in children at our center.Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study carried out in Sir Ganga Ram Hospital in New Delhi, India for a period of two years from August 2010 to August 2012. It included patients in whom PEG tube were placed during the study period and have had at least one year of post procedure follow up. Demograhic details, duration of procedure, complications, initial weight and height and then at 3 month, 6 months and 12 months of PEG tube placement were also recorded. Data between groups was compared using ANOVA and within groups across follow-ups was done using paired t-test.Results: Fourty six PEG insertions were performed during the study period, 26 twenty six conversions to BRT or Mickey button and ten PEG removals. The main indications for PEG insertion were Cerebral palsy with feeding difficulty (47.8 %). Erythema at the PEG insertion site was the most common complication (21%). There was significant improvement in the weight and height in all age group of patients at 3, 6 and 12 months post procedure with a p value <0.5. The average weight gain after 3, 6 and 12 months was 1.3 kg, 2.8 kg and 4.2 kg and the average height gain after 3, 6 and 12 months was 1.6 cm, 2.5 cm and 4.13 cm respectively.Conclusions: PEG is effective means for optimizing the nutritional goals of patients who are nutritionally debilitated with minimal complications.  DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jnps.v34i2.10960J Nepal Paediatr Soc 2014;34(2):125-131 

scholarly journals Predictors of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement after Stroke

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Li ◽  
Juan Zhang ◽  
Shujuan Li ◽  
Hongliang Guo ◽  
Wei Qin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Swallowing Disorders ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Lesion Volume ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube ◽  
Nihss Score ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Peg Tube ◽  
Bilateral Lesions

Aims:the goal of this study was to identify important prognostic variables affecting placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (Peg) tube after acute stroke.Methods:We retrospectively reviewed our patient database to identify acute ischemic stroke patients who placed Peg or nasogastric tube (Ngt) tube, but were free of other confounding conditions affecting swallowing. A total of 340 patients were involved in our study. We assessed the influence of age, National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHss) score, infarct volume, stroke subtype based on the toAst criteria, swallowing disorders, bilateral lesions in cerebrum and length of stay (los) in a logistic regression analysis.Results:In univariate analysis, age (p=0.048), NIHss score (p<0.0001), lesion volume (p<0.0001), los (p<0.0001), stroke location (p=0.045), and swallowing disorders (p<0.0001) were found to be the primary predictors of placing Peg. the presence of lesions in bilateral cerebral was included in the final model based on clinical considerations. After multivariate adjustment, only NIHss score (odds ratio [oR], 4.055; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.398-6.857; p=0.0001), lesion volume (oR, 1.69; 95%CI, 1.09–4.39; p=0.014), swallowing disorders (oR, 1.151; 95% CI, 1.02-1.294; p=0.047), los (oR, 0.955; 95% CI, 0.914-0.998; p=0.0415) and bilateral lesions (oR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.666-4.705; p=0.0001) remained significant.Conclusion:our data shows that NIHss score, lesion volume, swallowing disorders, los and bilateral lesions in cerebrum can predict the requiring of Peg tube insertion in patients after stroke.

Bronchoscope-Guided Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement by Interventional Pulmonologists: A Feasibility and Safety Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 851-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Folch ◽  
Fayez Kheir ◽  
Amit Mahajan ◽  
Daniel Alape ◽  
Omar Ibrahim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Percutaneous Tracheostomy ◽  
Gastrostomy Tube ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Gastrostomy Tube Placement ◽  
Peg Tube

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement is a procedure frequently done in the intensive care unit. The use of a traditional endoscope can be difficult in cases of esophageal stenosis and theoretically confers an increased risk of infection due to its complex architecture. We describe a technique using the bronchoscope, which allows navigation through stenotic esophageal lesions and also minimizes the risk of endoscopy-associated infections. Methods: Prospective series of patients who had PEG tube placement guided by a bronchoscope. Procedural outcomes including successful placement, duration of the entire procedure, time needed for passage of the bronchoscope from the oropharynx to the major curvature, PEG tube removal rate, and mortality were collected. Procedural adverse events, including infections and long-term PEG-related complications, were recorded. Results: A total of 84 patients underwent bronchoscope-guided PEG tube placement. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion was completed successfully in 82 (97.6%) patients. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement was performed immediately following percutaneous tracheostomy in 82.1%. Thirty-day mortality and 1-year mortality were 11.9% and 31%, respectively. Overall, minor complications occurred in 2.4% of patients, while there were no major complications. No serious infectious complications were identified and no endoscope-associated hospital acquired infections were documented. Conclusions: The use of the bronchoscope can be safely and effectively used for PEG tube placement. The use of bronchoscope rather than a gastroscope has several advantages, which include the ease of navigating through complex aerodigestive disorders such as strictures and fistulas as well as decreased health-care utilization. In addition, it may have a theoretical advantage of minimizing infections related to complex endoscopes.

scholarly journals Rectal Bleeding after Insertion of a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 637-643
Author(s):  
Ghadeer Alhazmi ◽  
Mroj Alsabri ◽  
Shahad Alsuwat ◽  
Adnan Al-Zangabi ◽  
Abdulaziz Al-Zahrani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Rectal Bleeding ◽  
Rare Complication ◽  
Tube Feeding ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube ◽  
Colon Injury ◽  
Tube Insertion ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Peg Tube

Iatrogenic injury to an internal organ such as the stomach, colon, small bowel, or liver after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube insertion is a rare complication. We present a case of rectal bleeding due to colon injury during PEG tube placement. This required urgent exploratory laparoscopic surgery with segmental resection of the transverse colon and replacement of the PEG tube. Postoperatively, the patient significantly improved with time and tolerated PEG tube feeding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document