scholarly journals Inadvertent Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement through the Transverse Colon to the Stomach Causing Intractable Diarrhea: A Case Report

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
David T. Burke ◽  
Andrew I. Geller ◽  
Alexios G. Carayannopoulos ◽  
Richard Goldstein
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Transverse Colon ◽  
Delayed Diagnosis ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Common Mechanism ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Peg Tube

Background. Among patients with chronic disease, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are a common mechanism to deliver enteral feedings to patients unable to feed by mouth. While several cases in the literature describe difficulties with and complications of the initial placement of the PEG, few studies have documented the effects of a delayed diagnosis of a misplaced tube. Methods. This case study reviews the hospitalization of an 82 year old male with an inadvertent placement of a PEG tube through the transverse colon. Photos of the placement in the stomach as well as those of the follow up colonoscopy, and a recording of the episodes of diarrhea during the hospitalization were made. Results. The records of this patient reveal complaints of gastrointestinal distress and diarrhea immediately after placement of the tube. Placement in the stomach was verified by endoscopy, with discovery of the tube only after a follow up colonoscopy. The tube remained in place after this discovery, and was removed weeks after the diarrhea was unsuccessfully treated with antibiotics. After tube removal, the patient recovered well and was sent home.

Bronchoscope-Guided Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement by Interventional Pulmonologists: A Feasibility and Safety Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 851-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Folch ◽  
Fayez Kheir ◽  
Amit Mahajan ◽  
Daniel Alape ◽  
Omar Ibrahim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Percutaneous Tracheostomy ◽  
Gastrostomy Tube ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Gastrostomy Tube Placement ◽  
Peg Tube

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement is a procedure frequently done in the intensive care unit. The use of a traditional endoscope can be difficult in cases of esophageal stenosis and theoretically confers an increased risk of infection due to its complex architecture. We describe a technique using the bronchoscope, which allows navigation through stenotic esophageal lesions and also minimizes the risk of endoscopy-associated infections. Methods: Prospective series of patients who had PEG tube placement guided by a bronchoscope. Procedural outcomes including successful placement, duration of the entire procedure, time needed for passage of the bronchoscope from the oropharynx to the major curvature, PEG tube removal rate, and mortality were collected. Procedural adverse events, including infections and long-term PEG-related complications, were recorded. Results: A total of 84 patients underwent bronchoscope-guided PEG tube placement. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion was completed successfully in 82 (97.6%) patients. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement was performed immediately following percutaneous tracheostomy in 82.1%. Thirty-day mortality and 1-year mortality were 11.9% and 31%, respectively. Overall, minor complications occurred in 2.4% of patients, while there were no major complications. No serious infectious complications were identified and no endoscope-associated hospital acquired infections were documented. Conclusions: The use of the bronchoscope can be safely and effectively used for PEG tube placement. The use of bronchoscope rather than a gastroscope has several advantages, which include the ease of navigating through complex aerodigestive disorders such as strictures and fistulas as well as decreased health-care utilization. In addition, it may have a theoretical advantage of minimizing infections related to complex endoscopes.

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with malignant peritoneal carcinomatosis induced bowel obstruction.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14012-e14012
Author(s):  
Pankaj G Vashi ◽  
Donald Peter Braun ◽  
Brenten Popiel ◽  
Digant Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Symptom Resolution ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Peg Tube

e14012 Background: Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement in advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis with bowel obstruction is a feasible palliative procedure to help patients with obstructive symptoms. We describe the safety and efficacy of using PEG tube for decompression in patients with large peritoneal masses. Methods: A consecutive case series of 62 patients (Apr-08 to Jun-11) with advanced abdominal carcinomatosis induced bowel obstruction. All patients were extensively treated for their cancer. None of them were surgical candidates due to extensive peritoneal involvement. All patients had symptoms of nausea, vomiting and pain at the time of PEG tube placement. All patients had a 28F (Bard) PEG tube placed for drainage. The primary outcomes of interest were complications and symptom resolution due to PEG tube placement. Frequency of nausea, vomiting and severity of pain was recorded daily in patient charts. Results: 16 were males and 46 females. The mean age was 50.5 years. Most common cancers were ovary, pancreas, colon and stomach. Of 62 patients, 57 patients had expired at the time of this analysis. Of those 57 expired, 49 had PEG tube at the time of death, while 8 had complete resolution of symptoms with PEG tube removed before death. The 5 out of 62 patients who are alive still have the PEG tube for drainage (average 70.4 days). The average duration of PEG tube placement for all patients combined was 70.9 days (range 6-312 days). Relief of nausea, vomiting and pain was observed in 53 (85.5%), 55 (88.7%) and 35 (56.5%) patients respectively. Of a total of 43 patients who had PEG tube placed for >= 30 days, 24 (56%) could continue with their chemotherapy cycles because of symptom resolution. Non life threatening complications of PEG tube placement were observed in 9 (14.5%) patients. 3 had infection at the insertion site, 2 had bleeding and 3 had leaking at the PEG tube site while 1 had aspiration. 6 (9.7%) patients required replacement of the PEG tube due to occlusion. Conclusions: Placement of PEG tube in presence of advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis is safe and effective in relieving obstructive symptoms as well as extending the period of active cancer therapy.

Meningitis Due to Enterobacter aerogenes Subsequent to Resection of Acoustic Neuroma and Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement: A Rare Nosocomial Event

2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 780-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Poetker ◽  
Charles E. Edmiston ◽  
Michelle M. Smith ◽  
Glenn A. Meyer ◽  
Phillip A. Wackym
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Acoustic Neuroma ◽  
Enterobacter Aerogenes ◽  
Intervention Strategies ◽  
Gastrostomy Tube ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Gastrostomy Tube Placement ◽  
Peg Tube

AbstractWe present a case of meningitis after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement subsequent to acoustic neuroma resection and cranioplasty. Four days following PEG tube placement the patient developed Enterobacter aerogenes meningitis, requiring explantation of infected cranioplasty material. His condition subsequently improved. Etiology and future intervention strategies are discussed (Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:780-782).

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) Tube Placement by an Emergency General Surgery Service: Long-Term Follow-Up is Lacking

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (7) ◽  
pp. 323-325
Author(s):  
Robert W. DesPain ◽  
William J. Parker ◽  
Angela T. Kindvall ◽  
Eric A. Elster ◽  
Elliot M. Jessie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
General Surgery ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Emergency General Surgery ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Peg Tube

scholarly journals Predictors of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement after Stroke

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Li ◽  
Juan Zhang ◽  
Shujuan Li ◽  
Hongliang Guo ◽  
Wei Qin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Swallowing Disorders ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Lesion Volume ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube ◽  
Nihss Score ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Peg Tube ◽  
Bilateral Lesions

Aims:the goal of this study was to identify important prognostic variables affecting placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (Peg) tube after acute stroke.Methods:We retrospectively reviewed our patient database to identify acute ischemic stroke patients who placed Peg or nasogastric tube (Ngt) tube, but were free of other confounding conditions affecting swallowing. A total of 340 patients were involved in our study. We assessed the influence of age, National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHss) score, infarct volume, stroke subtype based on the toAst criteria, swallowing disorders, bilateral lesions in cerebrum and length of stay (los) in a logistic regression analysis.Results:In univariate analysis, age (p=0.048), NIHss score (p<0.0001), lesion volume (p<0.0001), los (p<0.0001), stroke location (p=0.045), and swallowing disorders (p<0.0001) were found to be the primary predictors of placing Peg. the presence of lesions in bilateral cerebral was included in the final model based on clinical considerations. After multivariate adjustment, only NIHss score (odds ratio [oR], 4.055; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.398-6.857; p=0.0001), lesion volume (oR, 1.69; 95%CI, 1.09–4.39; p=0.014), swallowing disorders (oR, 1.151; 95% CI, 1.02-1.294; p=0.047), los (oR, 0.955; 95% CI, 0.914-0.998; p=0.0415) and bilateral lesions (oR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.666-4.705; p=0.0001) remained significant.Conclusion:our data shows that NIHss score, lesion volume, swallowing disorders, los and bilateral lesions in cerebrum can predict the requiring of Peg tube insertion in patients after stroke.

scholarly journals Rectal Bleeding after Insertion of a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 637-643
Author(s):  
Ghadeer Alhazmi ◽  
Mroj Alsabri ◽  
Shahad Alsuwat ◽  
Adnan Al-Zangabi ◽  
Abdulaziz Al-Zahrani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Rectal Bleeding ◽  
Rare Complication ◽  
Tube Feeding ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube ◽  
Colon Injury ◽  
Tube Insertion ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Peg Tube

Iatrogenic injury to an internal organ such as the stomach, colon, small bowel, or liver after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube insertion is a rare complication. We present a case of rectal bleeding due to colon injury during PEG tube placement. This required urgent exploratory laparoscopic surgery with segmental resection of the transverse colon and replacement of the PEG tube. Postoperatively, the patient significantly improved with time and tolerated PEG tube feeding.

scholarly journals Predictive Factors for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement After Anterior Cervical Fusion

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 260-265
Author(s):  
Rafael De la Garza-Ramos ◽  
C. Rory Goodwin ◽  
Nancy Abu-Bonsrah ◽  
Amit Jain ◽  
Peter G. Passias ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Anterior Cervical Fusion ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube ◽  
Cervical Fusion ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Peg Tube

Study Design: Retrospective case-control study. Objectives: To identify incidence and risk factors for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement after anterior cervical fusion (ACF). Methods: Adult patients undergoing elective ACF with/without corpectomy for spondylosis from 2002 to 2011 were identified using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. The primary outcome measure was PEG tube placement; secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, total hospital charges, and discharge disposition. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to identify independent predictors of PEG tube placement. Results: Of 164 097 patients, 217 (0.13%) required a PEG tube. Patients needing PEG tube placement were older (69 vs 52 years; P < .001) and more likely to be male (65% vs 46.6%; P < .001) when compared with control patients. After regression analysis, age over 65 year (odds ratio [OR] = 4.16; P < .001) was the strongest independent predictor for PEG tube placement; other associated factors included male gender (OR = 2.14; P < .001), congestive heart failure (OR = 4.11; P < .001), anemia (OR = 3.52; P < .001), alcohol abuse (OR = 2.80; P = .009), renal failure (OR = 2.25; P = .003), chronic lung disease (OR = 1.78; P < .001), corpectomy (OR = 2.16; P < .001), and fusion of ≥3 segments (OR = 1.74; P < .001). Mortality rate for patients requiring PEG tube placement was 5.1% versus 0.05% for controls ( P < .001); average hospital charges were $134 379 versus $39 519 ( P < .001), and nonroutine discharges were seen in 89.3% versus only 6.4% for controls ( P < .001). Conclusions: The incidence of PEG tube placement after ACF was 0.13% in this study. Identified risk factors included age >65, corpectomy, fusion of ≥3 segments, and various comorbidities. Additionally, there may be increased risk of in-hospital mortality, hospital charges, and nonroutine discharges among these patients.

Safely replacing a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube using a portable X-ray system at a patient’s home

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. e238462
Author(s):  
Hitoshi Eguchi ◽  
Naoko E Katsuki ◽  
Ken-ichi Yamamoto ◽  
Masaki Tago
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Infarction ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Guide Wire ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Home Medical Care ◽  
Peg Tube

An 81-year-old woman who underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) a year before, after cerebral infarction was receiving home medical care. The first accidental PEG tube removal occurred after clinic hours, and the home-care doctor visited her home to quickly reinsert the tube. After the narrowed fistula was dilated, the tube was reinserted with a guide wire. An X-ray taken with a CALNEO Xair, which is an easily portable X-ray system launched in 2018, confirmed that the tip of the PEG tube was successfully placed in the stomach. A similar accidental removal occurred 2 months later, and we managed it in the same way. Both events were resolved with a single radiograph without significant difficulty. With in-home medical care, PEG tube replacement can be performed easily and safely with a handy portable X-ray system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document