DETECT III: A multicenter, randomized, phase III study to compare standard therapy alone versus standard therapy plus lapatinib in patients (pts) with initially HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer but with HER2-positive circulating tumor cells (CTC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS1146-TPS1146
Author(s):  
Carsten Hagenbeck ◽  
Carola Anna Melcher ◽  
Johann Wolfgang Janni ◽  
Andreas Schneeweiss ◽  
Peter A. Fasching ◽  
...  

TPS1146 Background: HER2 status may change over the course of disease in breast cancer pts. Approx. 20-30% of pts with initially HER2-negative breast cancer have HER2-positive metastasis (Zidan et al. 2005; Tewes et al. 2009). Determining HER2 status on CTC is one option to re-evaluate HER2 status at the time metastasis is diagnosed. Currently it is unclear if HER2-targeted therapy based on the assessment of HER2 status of CTC reveals a clinical benefit. Methods: This is a randomized, open-label, two arm phase III study to investigate the clinical efficacy of lapatinib, as a HER2-targeted therapy in initially HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer pts with HER2-positive CTC at the time of distant disease. As only half of the pts with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer show CTC-positivity and of those approx. 32% will exhibit HER2-positive CTC (Fehm et al. 2010), screening of about 1420 pts is required to enroll 228 pts. Main inclusion criteria: metastatic breast cancer with HER2-negative primary tumor tissue and/or biopsies from metastatic sites or locoregional recurrences, evidence of ≥1 HER2-positive CTC and ≥1 measurable metastatic lesion according to RECIST. Eligible pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive standard treatment vs. standard treatment plus lapatinib. Standard chemo- or endocrine therapy must be approved in combination with lapatinib or been investigated in prior clinical trials. Primary endpoint is progression free survival. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate, clinical benefit rate, overall survival and dynamic of CTC. The DETECT III trial is one of the first trials where treatment is based on phenotypic characteristics of CTC. If this trial succeeds in proving efficacy of lapatinib in pts with initially HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer but HER2-positive CTC, this will establish a new strategy in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12500-e12500
Author(s):  
Shinichiro Kubo

e12500 Background: Currently, there are no data related to re-administering trastuzumab (T) + pertuzumab (P) beyond the second-line therapy to patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced/metastatic breast cancer (HER2-MBC) who had previously received P. The present study targeted patients with HER2-MBC who were previously treated with P and aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of additional administration (top-up intervention) of P post-disease progression (PD) after standard treatment with T plus chemotherapy vinorerbine(VNR) or eribulin (ERI). Methods: SBP-08 was a multicenter, collaborative, single-arm phase II study of HER2-MBC patients who had previously received P. After standard treatment with T and chemotherapy, P was additionally administered (top-up intervention) post-PD. Results: Eleven HER2-MBC patients, recruited between June 2016 and June 2018, who had previously received P participated in this study. Their mean age was 63.5 years, and 45% were estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, while 55% were ER-positive. The mean chemotherapy history was 3.6 regimens, with a median of four regimens. Previous treatment regimens with P had been effective in all patients. All patients had organ metastasis and treatment histories with TDM-1. Initially, during the two-year case collection period, registration of 30 patients was planned. However, the study was terminated because the interim analysis did not demonstrative effectiveness, and it was decided that there were no potential benefits to the patients. The overall response rate (ORR) of the standard treatment was 0%, stable disease (SD) was 36%, PD was 55%, and the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 0%. The following combination anticancer agents were used: VNR (10 patients) and ERI (one patient). The intervention treatment (top-up with P) achieved the following: ORR 0%, SD 22%, PD 78%, and CBR 0%. PFS for the standard treatment was 1.6 months, whereas PFS for the intervention treatment was 1.3 months. In the standard treatment, febrile neutropenia was observed in two patients. No increases in adverse events were observed with the intervention treatment. Conclusions: No clinical benefit was demonstrated with the intervention treatment in the present study. Top-up with P after standard treatment with T and chemotherapy post-PD was deemed ineffective. Clinical trial information: UMIN000020837.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document