Preliminary results of a prospective study of 18F-NAF PET/CT in prostate cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 103-103
Author(s):  
Jong Chul Park ◽  
Karen A. Kurdziel ◽  
Liza Lindenberg ◽  
James L. Gulley ◽  
Ravi Amrit Madan ◽  
...  

103 Background: We performed a prospective study of 18F-NaF PET/CT bone scan (NaF) in the detection of bone metastases in men with prostate cancer. We previously reported that NaF identified more malignant lesions than Technetium-99m MDP bone scan (TcBS) (ASCO 2012 10589). This study evaluates the ability of NaF to detect bone metastasis in men with normal TcBS and also explores the change in NaF over 6 and 12 months compared to PSA changes. Methods: In a prospective 2-arm study, 60 men with prostate cancer (30 with and 30 without bone metastases by TcBS) were studied (ages 51-79). All had NaF and TcBS at baseline, followed by repeat NaF at 6 and 12 months. TcBS and NaF were reviewed by experienced nuclear medicine physicians. Abnormal foci of uptake on TcBS and NaF were classified as benign, malignant or indeterminate. Malignant uptake on NaF was confirmed by characteristic osteoblastic features on CT. Scan results were categorized as “positive” if any malignant lesion was present. In the 6 and 12 months follow up NaF, results were categorized as progression of disease (PD) = any new lesions or SUV increase > 30% in known lesions; stable disease (SD) = no new lesions or SUV changes < 30% in known lesions; and improvement of disease (ID) = resolution of known lesions or decrease SUV > 30% in known lesions. Results: 60 men have enrolled on study, 58 and 34 completed 6 and 12 month follow-up respectively. At baseline, 14 of 30 (47%) men with negative TcBS showed evidence of bone metastases in NaF (PSA mean 45); 7/14 had 2 baseline NaF and showed positive results in both, demonstrating reproducibility; 13/14 and 7/14 had follow up NaF at 6 and 12 months, respectively, all of which remained positive. In follow-up, 13/58 men at 6 months and 8/34 men at 12 months had PD from baseline on NaF, of whom 5/13 (38%) at 6 months and 5/8 (63%) at 12 months also had a PSA increase > 50%. All men who had PD on NaF at 6 months and had a follow-up scan at 12 months remained positive. 15 men at 6 months and 7 men at 12 months had ID on follow-up NaF, of which 11/15 (73%) and 6/7 (86%) had PSA decrease > 50% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Conclusions: Early results of this ongoing NaF study are encouraging and suggest NaF identifies metastatic bone disease earlier than TcBS and correlates with changes in PSA. Clinical trial information: NCT01240551.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10589-10589
Author(s):  
Joseph W. Kim ◽  
Maria Liza Lindenberg ◽  
William L. Dahut ◽  
James L. Gulley ◽  
Ravi A. Madan ◽  
...  

10589 Background: We evaluated the clinical utility of 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT bone scan (18F-NaF) in the detection of bone metastases in patients (pts) with prostate cancer in comparison with Technetium-99m MDP bone scan (TcBS). Methods: In a prospective study, from October 2010-December 2011, 30 prostate cancer pts (ages 51-79), 21 with known bone metastases and 9 without known bone metastases, had18F-NaF and a TcBS performed. Abnormal foci of uptake on both TcBS and 18F-NaFwere classified as benign, malignant or indeterminate. Benign lesions included uptake in the joints and linear uptake at the endplates of the vertebral bodies consistent with degenerative changes. Malignant uptake on 18F-NaF scans was confirmed by characteristic osteoblastic features on CT. All TcBS and 18F-NaF were reviewed by an experienced nuclear medicine physician. For the patient-based analysis, scan results were categorized as positive (POS) = any malignant lesion; indeterminate (IND) = not distinctly malignant or benign; negative (NEG) = benign lesions only. Results: In the lesion-based analysis, 21 of 30 (70%) pts had more malignant lesions identified on 18F-NaF than on TcBS. The mean number of additional malignant lesions per patient on 18F-NaF vs TcBS was 4. Eight of the 30 pts had same number of malignant lesions identified in both studies. One of 30 pts had one less malignant lesion identified on 18F-NaF than on TcBS. CT correlation by 18F-NaF PET/CT of this particular lesion did not confirm osteoblastic feature. Malignant lesion distribution on 18F-NaF included: spine (28%), thorax (26%), pelvis (24%), long bones (13%) and skull (10%). In the patient-based analysis, 24 pts (80%) were POS by 18F-NaF, of whom 14 pts were POS, 8 were IND, and 2 were NEG by corresponding TcBS; in the 4 pts with NEG 18F-NaF, zero were POS, 2 were IND and 2 were NEG by corresponding TcBS. Conclusions: 18F-NaF identified more malignant lesions than TcBS. 18F-NaF may also add useful information in the management of advanced prostate cancer pts with and without known bone metastases.


2012 ◽  
Vol 187 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mads Poulsen ◽  
Henrik Petersen ◽  
Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen ◽  
Jørn S. Jakobsen ◽  
Oke Gerke ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 317
Author(s):  
G. Marchioro ◽  
M. Vidali ◽  
A. Volpe ◽  
M. Billia ◽  
G. Maso ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document