scholarly journals A prospective study determining and comparing the diagnostic accuracy of fluoride-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, whole-body bone SPECT/CT and whole-body MRI for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Dyrberg ◽  
Helle W. Hendel ◽  
Vibeke B. Løgager ◽  
Claus Madsen ◽  
Erik M. Pedersen ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 1221-1230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Dyrberg ◽  
Helle W. Hendel ◽  
Tri Hien Viet Huynh ◽  
Tobias Wirenfeldt Klausen ◽  
Vibeke B. Løgager ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 103-103
Author(s):  
Jong Chul Park ◽  
Karen A. Kurdziel ◽  
Liza Lindenberg ◽  
James L. Gulley ◽  
Ravi Amrit Madan ◽  
...  

103 Background: We performed a prospective study of 18F-NaF PET/CT bone scan (NaF) in the detection of bone metastases in men with prostate cancer. We previously reported that NaF identified more malignant lesions than Technetium-99m MDP bone scan (TcBS) (ASCO 2012 10589). This study evaluates the ability of NaF to detect bone metastasis in men with normal TcBS and also explores the change in NaF over 6 and 12 months compared to PSA changes. Methods: In a prospective 2-arm study, 60 men with prostate cancer (30 with and 30 without bone metastases by TcBS) were studied (ages 51-79). All had NaF and TcBS at baseline, followed by repeat NaF at 6 and 12 months. TcBS and NaF were reviewed by experienced nuclear medicine physicians. Abnormal foci of uptake on TcBS and NaF were classified as benign, malignant or indeterminate. Malignant uptake on NaF was confirmed by characteristic osteoblastic features on CT. Scan results were categorized as “positive” if any malignant lesion was present. In the 6 and 12 months follow up NaF, results were categorized as progression of disease (PD) = any new lesions or SUV increase > 30% in known lesions; stable disease (SD) = no new lesions or SUV changes < 30% in known lesions; and improvement of disease (ID) = resolution of known lesions or decrease SUV > 30% in known lesions. Results: 60 men have enrolled on study, 58 and 34 completed 6 and 12 month follow-up respectively. At baseline, 14 of 30 (47%) men with negative TcBS showed evidence of bone metastases in NaF (PSA mean 45); 7/14 had 2 baseline NaF and showed positive results in both, demonstrating reproducibility; 13/14 and 7/14 had follow up NaF at 6 and 12 months, respectively, all of which remained positive. In follow-up, 13/58 men at 6 months and 8/34 men at 12 months had PD from baseline on NaF, of whom 5/13 (38%) at 6 months and 5/8 (63%) at 12 months also had a PSA increase > 50%. All men who had PD on NaF at 6 months and had a follow-up scan at 12 months remained positive. 15 men at 6 months and 7 men at 12 months had ID on follow-up NaF, of which 11/15 (73%) and 6/7 (86%) had PSA decrease > 50% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Conclusions: Early results of this ongoing NaF study are encouraging and suggest NaF identifies metastatic bone disease earlier than TcBS and correlates with changes in PSA. Clinical trial information: NCT01240551.


2021 ◽  
Vol 206 (Supplement 3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiromichi Iwamura ◽  
Jun Ito ◽  
Shingo Hatakeyama ◽  
Yuta Kojima ◽  
Takuma Narita ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (9) ◽  
pp. 1119-1125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Dyrberg ◽  
Emil L Larsen ◽  
Helle W Hendel ◽  
Henrik S Thomsen

Background Patient acceptance is an important factor when implementing imaging methods in clinical practice in line with availability, diagnostic accuracy, and cost-effectiveness. Purpose To investigate patient experience and acceptance regarding18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), 11 C-choline-PET/CT, whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI), and 99mTc-hydroxymethane diphosphonate (HDP) single photon emission/computed tomography (SPECT/CT). Material and Methods One hundred and forty-nine patients with prostate cancer filled in a questionnaire regarding their experience of the imaging procedures they had been undergoing as part of a diagnostic accuracy study. Each patient had been undergoing a NaF-PET/CT, a WB-MRI, and either a SPECT/CT (group A) or a choline-PET/CT (group B). Results All four imaging methods received overall experience ratings at the favorable end of a 5-point Likert scale with the two PET/CT scans receiving marginally better average ratings (2.0) compared to SPECT/CT (2.2) and WB-MRI (2.3). The arm positioning above the head was the most uncomfortable part of the three nuclear medicine scans, whereas the acoustic noise was the most unpleasant part of the WB-MRI. The experience of staff instruction was relatively strongly correlated to the overall scanning experience of all four imaging modalities. Overall, the patients were willing to repeat the four imaging methods and NaF-PET/CT was the method most preferred in both groups. Conclusion Four imaging procedures were evaluated from the perspective of a selected group of prostate cancer patients. NaF-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, WB-MRI, and bone SPECT/CT are well accepted imaging methods, and most patients prefer NaF-PET/CT.


2012 ◽  
Vol 187 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mads Poulsen ◽  
Henrik Petersen ◽  
Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen ◽  
Jørn S. Jakobsen ◽  
Oke Gerke ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document