Processes of discontinuing chemotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer at the end of life.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 96-96
Author(s):  
William F. Pirl ◽  
Joseph A. Greer ◽  
Kelly Irwin ◽  
Inga Tolin Lennes ◽  
Vicki A. Jackson ◽  
...  

96 Background: Administration of chemotherapy close to death is widely recognized as poor quality care. The goals of this study were to describe the processes of how chemotherapy is discontinued and examine their relationships with timing before death, hospice referrals, and terminal hospitalizations. Methods: We reviewed electronic health records of a prospective cohort of 151 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who participated in a randomized trial of early palliative care. Chemotherapy treatment during the final regimen was qualitatively analyzed, identifying categories of discontinuation processes. We then quantitatively investigated predictors and outcomes of the discontinuation process categories. Results: 144 patients had died, with 81 and 48 receiving intravenous (IV) and oral chemotherapy as final regimens, respectively. Five discontinuation processes were identified: definitive decisions; deferred decisions (breaks); disruptions for radiation therapy; disruptions due to hospitalizations; and no decisions. For patients receiving IV chemotherapy, definitive decisions were least frequent (19.7%), while disruptions due to hospitalizations were most frequent (27.2%). The different processes occurred at significantly different times before death; and often hospice referrals occurred months after chemotherapy discontinuation. Deferred decisions, or “breaks,” occurred at the longest interval before death, but definitive decisions resulted in greatest hospice utilization. Among patients receiving oral chemotherapy, 83.3% were switched from IV to oral as their final regimen, sometimes concurrent with or even after hospice referral. Conclusions: Patients with metastatic NSCLC stop their final chemotherapy regimen via different processes, which significantly vary in time before death and in subsequent end-of-life care.

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S1081
Author(s):  
N. Jiménez-García ◽  
L. Ronco-Dumas ◽  
F. Rivas-Ruiz ◽  
R. Quirós-López ◽  
C. Flores-Guardabrazo ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Boucher ◽  
Joan Lucca ◽  
Catherine Hooper ◽  
Lillian Pedulla ◽  
Donna Berry

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 29-29
Author(s):  
Catherine R. Fedorenko ◽  
Karma L. Kreizenbeck ◽  
Laura Panattoni ◽  
Julia Rose Walker ◽  
Cara L. McDermott ◽  
...  

29 Background: Cancer care costs are rising, creating concerns about affordability. As a result, delivery systems are creating alternative payment structures to lower costs while maintaining or improving quality. As cancer care delivery often involves multiple provider systems, measuring cost may be difficult. In response, using commercial insurance claims linked to cancer registry records, we constructed broadly applicable, reproducible, clinically relevant episodes to measure costs. Methods: Cancer registry records for patients diagnosed in Western Washington from January 2007-June 2016 were linked with claims from two regional commercial insurers. Patients are age 18+, diagnosed with breast, colorectal (CRC), or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and enrolled with a single insurance plan. With oncologist input, we constructed three care phases: diagnosis (30 days before diagnosis to first treatment), initial treatment (first treatment through first 4 month treatment gap), and end of life (last 30 days). Costs include all claims paid within the phase (2016 inflation adjusted). Supportive care includes colony-stimulating factors, blood transfusions, antibiotics, antivirals, antifungals, and antiemetics. Results: This study included 8,727 patients at diagnosis, 7,686 during treatment, and 1,736 at end of life. Diagnosis phase averaged 54 days and cost $6,936 (SD $11,761, median $4,021). Treatment averaged 126 days, with costs of $61,148 (SD $75,432, median $35,750). Average end-of-life costs were $15,829 (SD $30,222, median $2,347). The table below provides an example of the variation in costs during the treatment phase using local-stage tumors. Conclusions: Clinically relevant episodes of care and cost measures can be constructed using claims-registry data. This allows for identification of high-cost care categories and areas with large-cost variability, which may be helpful when designing value-based reimbursement programs or identifying areas for potential cost-reduction.[Table: see text]


Author(s):  
Nathan A. Gray ◽  
Thomas W. LeBlanc

This chapter provides an overview and commentary on the 2010 study by Temel and colleagues regarding early palliative care for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. It describes the trial design and findings while also providing a concise critique of the study and a brief review of relevant subsequent studies. The chapter describes the basics of the study, including funding, year study began, year study was published, study location, who was studied, who was excluded, how many patients, study design, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, gives a summary and discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document