Accuracy of manual and automated rectal contours using helical tomotherapy image guidance scans during prostate radiotherapy.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 94-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Elizabeth Scaife ◽  
Karl Harrison ◽  
Amelia Drew ◽  
Xiaohao Cai ◽  
Juheon Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Image Guidance ◽  
Helical Tomotherapy ◽  
Normal Structure ◽  
Conformity Index ◽  
Observer Variability ◽  
Prostate Radiotherapy ◽  
Manual Contour ◽  
Initial Cohort ◽  
Automated Methods

94 Background: Prostate radiotherapy can be delivered using daily image-guided helical tomotherapy. Previous work has shown that contouring the rectum on the kV planning CT scan has a Jaccard conformity index (JCI) of 0.78 for different oncologists (inter-observer variability) and 0.82 for a single oncologist (intra-observer variability) (Lutgendorf-Caucig C et al. Feasibility of CBCT-based target and normal structure delineation in prostate cancer radiotherapy: multi-observer and image multi-modality study. Radiother Oncol. 2011;98(2):154-61.). Using the daily image guidance MV CT scan we have developed automated methods to contour the rectum in order to investigate the dose delivered over a course of treatment. We sought to quantify the accuracy of MV manual and automated contours. Methods: A single oncologist (JES) contoured the rectum on 370 MV scans for 10 participants treated with helical tomotherapy to prostate and pelvic lymph nodes. Accuracy of MV manual contours was tested using a scalar algorithm to enlarge and reduce the contours and intra-observer re-contouring at a 3-month interval. Automated contouring, incorporating the Chan-Vese algorithm, was developed and outputs were compared with manual contours. Results: JES could identify differences in MV manual contour size at the level of ±2.2 mm, equivalent to 1.7 pixels. The median JCI for MV re-contouring was 0.87 with inter-quartile range (IQR) 0.78 to 0.90. When compared with manual contours, automated outputs had a median JCI of 0.79 (IQR 0.74 to 0.79). These results were obtained after 3 iterations, each taking less than 10 seconds. Conclusions: Manual contouring using MV scans was accurate, at a level of approximately 2 mm, and reproducible, with JCI of 0.87. The time taken to contour was approximately 20 minutes per scan. Automated contouring was also reproducible with JCI of 0.79 and, in contrast, took less than a minute per scan. Both manual and automated methods produced results comparable to those for contouring using kV scans. We plan to use auto-contouring to calculate accumulated dose to the rectum in an initial cohort of 100 participants. These doses will be correlated with toxicity as part of the VoxTox Study.

Helical tomotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer improves target conformity and homogeneity: A comparison with fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 3146-3155
Author(s):  
Luhua Wang
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Field Intensity ◽  
Helical Tomotherapy ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽  
Matched Pair ◽  
Conformity Index ◽  
Target Coverage ◽  
Advanced Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Fixed Field ◽  
Intensity Modulated

Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness of helical tomotherapy (HT) in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer (EC) and compare target homogeneity, conformity and normal tissue doses between HT and fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (ff-IMRT).Methods: In all, 23 patients with cT3-4N0-1M0-1a thoracic EC (upper esophagus, 9 patients; middle esophagus, 6; distal esophagus, 6 and esophagogastric junction, 2) who were treated with ff-IMRT (60 Gy in 30 fractions) were re-planned for HT and ff-IMRT with the same clinical require­ments. Comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test.Results: Compared with ff-IMRT, HT significantly reduced the homogeneity index for thoracic, upper, middle and distal ECs by 38%, 31%, 36% and 33%, respectively (P < 0.05). The conformity index was increased by HT for thoracic, upper and middle ECs by 9%, 9% and 18%, respectively (P < 0.05). Target coverage was improved by 1% with HT (P < 0.05). The mean lung dose was significantly reduced by HT for thoracic and upper ECs (P < 0.05). The V20 (volume receiving at least 20 Gy) and higher dose volumes of the lungs were decreased by HT in all cases, but the differences were significant for thoracic, upper and distal ECs (P < 0.05), with reductions of 2.1%, 3.1% and 2.2%, respectively. HT resulted in a larger lung V5 for thoracic, upper, middle and distal ECs, with increases of 3.5%, 1.5%, 7.2% and 3.2%, respectively. Heart sparing was significantly better with HT than with ff-IMRT in terms of the V30 and V40 for thoracic, upper, middle and distal ECs (P < 0.05).Conclusions: Compared to ff-IMRT, HT provides superior target coverage, conformity and homogeneity, with reduced the volume of high doses to the lungs and heart for advanced EC. HT may be a treatment option for advanced EC, especially upper EC.

scholarly journals Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hippocampus- and Scalp-Sparing Whole Brain Radiotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 153303382110601
Author(s):  
Taiki Takaoka ◽  
Natsuo Tomita ◽  
Tomoki Mizuno ◽  
Shingo Hashimoto ◽  
Takahiro Tsuchiya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Decline ◽  
Proton Therapy ◽  
Helical Tomotherapy ◽  
Whole Brain Radiotherapy ◽  
Conformity Index ◽  
Target Dose ◽  
Whole Brain ◽  
Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Brain Radiotherapy

Objective: Cognitive decline and alopecia after radiotherapy are challenging problems. We aimed to compare whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plans reducing radiation dose to the hippocampus and scalp between helical tomotherapy (HT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Methods: We conducted a planning study of WBRT for 10 patients. The clinical target volume was defined as the whole brain excluding the hippocampus avoidance (HA) region. The prescribed dose was 30 Gy in 10 fractions to cover 95% of the target. Constraint goals were defined for the target and organs at risk (OAR). Results: Both techniques met the dose constraints for the target and OAR. However, the coverage of the target (dose covering 95% [D95%] and 98% [D98%] of the volume) were better in IMPT than HT (HT vs IMPT: D95%, 29.9 Gy vs 30.0 Gy, P < .001; D98%, 26.7 Gy vs 28.1 Gy, P = .002). The homogeneity and conformity of the target were also better in IMPT than HT (HT vs IMPT: homogeneity index, 1.50 vs 1.28, P < .001; conformity index, 1.30 vs 1.14, P < .001). IMPT reduced the D100% of the hippocampus by 59% (HT vs IMPT: 9.3 Gy vs 3.8 Gy, P < .001) and reduced the Dmean of the hippocampus by 37% (HT vs IMPT: 11.1 Gy vs 7.0 Gy, P < .001) compared with HT. The scalp IMPT reduced the percentage of the volume receiving at least 20 Gy (V20Gy) and V10Gy compared with HT (HT vs IMPT: V20Gy, 56.7% vs 6.6%, P < .001; V10Gy, 90.5% vs 37.1%, P < .001). Conclusion: Both techniques provided acceptable target dose coverage. Especially, IMPT achieved excellent hippocampus- and scalp-sparing. HA-WBRT using IMPT is a promising treatment to prevent cognitive decline and alopecia.

scholarly journals Overview of patient preparation strategies to manage internal organ motion during radiotherapy in the pelvis

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-189
Author(s):  
F. Slevin ◽  
M. Beasley ◽  
R. Speight ◽  
J. Lilley ◽  
L. Murray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Guidance ◽  
Conformal Radiotherapy ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Organ Motion ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Prostate Radiotherapy ◽  
Bladder Filling ◽  
Full Bladder ◽  
Patient Preparation ◽  
Belly Board

AbstractIntroduction:Pelvic internal organs change in volume and position during radiotherapy. This may compromise the efficacy of treatment or worsen its toxicity. There may be limitations to fully correcting these changes using online image guidance; therefore, effective and consistent patient preparation and positioning remain important. This review aims to provide an overview of the extent of pelvic organ motion and strategies to manage this motion.Methods and Materials:Given the breadth of this topic, a systematic review was not undertaken. Instead, existing systematic reviews and individual high-quality studies addressing strategies to manage pelvic organ motion have been discussed. Suggested levels of evidence and grades of recommendation for each strategy have been applied.Results:Various strategies to manage rectal changes have been investigated including diet and laxatives, enemas and rectal emptying tubes and rectal displacement with endorectal balloons (ERBs) and rectal spacers. Bladder-filling protocols and bladder ultrasound have been used to try to standardise bladder volume. Positioning the patient supine, using a full bladder and positioning prone with or without a belly board, has been examined in an attempt to reduce the volume of irradiated small bowel. Some randomised trials have been performed, with evidence to support the use of ERBs, rectal spacers, bladder-filling protocols and the supine over prone position in prostate radiotherapy. However, there was a lack of consistent high-quality evidence that would be applicable to different disease sites within the pelvis. Many studies included small numbers of patients were non-randomised, used less conformal radiotherapy techniques or did not report clinical outcomes such as toxicity.Conclusions:There is uncertainty as to the clinical benefit of many of the commonly adopted interventions to minimise pelvic organ motion. Given this and the limitations in online image guidance compensation, further investigation of adaptive radiotherapy strategies is required.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document