target coverage
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

523
(FIVE YEARS 140)

H-INDEX

30
(FIVE YEARS 6)

2022 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Maja B. Sharma ◽  
Kenneth Jensen ◽  
Jeppe Friborg ◽  
Bob Smulders ◽  
Elo Andersen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1311
Author(s):  
Dorota Maria Borowicz ◽  
Konstantin N. Shipulin ◽  
Gennady V. Mytsin ◽  
Agnieszka Skrobała ◽  
Piotr Milecki ◽  
...  

Few studies have directly compared passive scattering (PS) to intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in the delivery of ultra-hypofractionated proton beams to the localized prostate cancer (PCa). In this preliminary study involving five patients previously treated with CyberKnife, treatment plans were created for PS and IMPT (36.25 CGE in five fractions with two opposing fields) to compare the dosimetric parameters to the planning target volume (PTV) and organs-at-risk (OAR: rectum, bladder, femoral heads). Both plans met the acceptance criteria. Significant differences were observed in the minimum and maximum doses to the PTV. The mean dose to the PTV was lower for PS (35.62 ± 0.26 vs. 37.18 ± 0.14; p = 0.002). Target coverage (D98%) was better for IMPT (96.79% vs. 99.10%; p = 0.004). IMPT resulted in significantly lower mean doses to the rectum (16.75 CGE vs. 6.88 CGE; p = 0.004) and bladder (17.69 CGE vs. 5.98 CGE p = 0.002). High dose to the rectum (V36.25 CGE) were lower with PS, but not significantly opposite to high dose to the bladder. No significant differences were observed in mean conformity index values, with a non-significant trend towards higher mean homogeneity index values for PS. Non-significant differences in the gamma index for both fields were observed. These findings suggest that both PS and IMPT ultra-hypofractionated proton therapy for PCa are highly precise, offering good target coverage and sparing of normal tissues and OARs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi69-vi70
Author(s):  
Enzhuo Quan ◽  
Eun Han ◽  
Christine Chung ◽  
Tina Briere ◽  
Zsila Sadighi ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION Early results suggest that tumor treating fields (TTF) concurrent with radiotherapy (RT) for glioblastoma yields acceptable dosimetry in adults; the impact on RT dose distribution in children is unknown. This study was undertaken to evaluate the dosimetric impact of TTF on concurrent photon RT for children with brain tumors. METHODS CT scans of an anthropomorphic pediatric head phantom (approximately 15-year-old) and an infant-head-sized spherical phantom were acquired with and without TTF attached. For each phantom, simulated supratentorial tumor targets were initially contoured on CT datasets acquired without TTF attached. Treatment plans using volumetric modulated arc therapy were created to deliver 60Gy and 50Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and clinical tumor volume (CTV), respectively, in 30 fractions. The dose distributions of the same treatment plans were then re-computed with TTF attached. Target coverage metrics were compared between dose distributions with and without TTF. To measure skin dose, treatment plans were delivered with thermoluminescent dosimeters placed on the phantoms at various locations, with and without TTF attached. RESULTS The presence of TTF slightly reduced target coverage. For the two phantoms studied, D95 of the CTV was reduced by 0.65% and 1.03%, and D95 of the GTV was reduced by 0.7% and 1.05%, respectively. Electrodes under the direct beam path increased skin dose by an average of 43.3% (0.3Gy – 20.7Gy), but all skin dose measurements stayed within tolerances. TTF electrodes out of the RT field did not cause an increase in measured dose. CONCLUSIONS The dosimetric impact of TTF on pediatric head phantoms receiving concurrent RT resembles that reported in adult studies. Although the tumor dose is not significantly affected, the skin dose notably increases due to the bolus effect from the TTF electrodes, which may be mitigated by skin-sparing planning and shifting of the device during RT.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Leila Ajam ◽  
Ali Nodehi ◽  
Hosein Mohamadi

Literature in recent years has introduced several studies conducted to solve the target coverage problem in wireless sensor networks (WSNs). Sensors are conventionally assumed as devices with only a single power level. However, real applications may involve sensors with multiple power levels (i.e., multiple sensing ranges each of which possesses a unique power consumption). Consequently, one of the key problems in WSNs is how to provide a full coverage on all targets distributed in a network containing sensors with multiple power levels and simultaneously prolong the network lifetime as much as possible. This problem is known as Maximum Network Lifetime With Adjustable Ranges (MNLAR) and its NP-completeness has been already proved. To solve this problem, we proposed an efficient hybrid algorithm containing Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Tabu Search (TS) aiming at constructing cover sets that consist of sensors with appropriate sensing ranges to provide a desirable coverage for all the targets in the network. In our hybrid model, GA as a robust global searching algorithm is used for exploration purposes, while TS with its already-proved local searching ability is utilized for exploitation purposes. As a result, the proposed algorithm is capable of creating a balance between intensification and diversification. To solve the MNLR problem in an efficient way, the proposed model was also enriched with an effective encoding method, genetic operators, and neighboring structure. In the present paper, different experiments were performed for the purpose of evaluating how the proposed algorithm performs the tasks defined. The results clearly confirmed the superiority of the proposed algorithm over the greedy-based algorithm and learning automata-based algorithm in terms of extending the network lifetime. Moreover, it was found that the use of multiple power levels altogether caused the extension of the network lifetime.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Tamihardja ◽  
Sinan Cirsi ◽  
Patrick Kessler ◽  
Gary Razinskas ◽  
Florian Exner ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Evaluation of delivered dose to the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) for moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy of prostate cancer by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based dose accumulation and target coverage analysis. Methods Twenty-three patients with localized prostate cancer treated with moderately hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) between December 2016 and February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Included patients were required to have an identifiable DIL on bi-parametric planning magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). After import into the RayStation treatment planning system and application of a step-wise density override, the fractional doses were computed on each CBCT and were consecutively mapped onto the planning CT via a deformation vector field derived from deformable image registration. Fractional doses were accumulated for all CBCTs and interpolated for missing CBCTs, resulting in the delivered dose for PTVDIL, PTVBoost, PTV, and the organs at risk. The location of the index lesions was recorded according to the sector map of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) Version 2.1. Target coverage of the index lesions was evaluated and stratified for location. Results In total, 338 CBCTs were available for analysis. Dose accumulation target coverage of PTVDIL, PTVBoost, and PTV was excellent and no cases of underdosage in DMean, D95%, D02%, and D98% could be detected. Delivered rectum DMean did not significantly differ from the planned dose. Bladder mean DMean was higher than planned with 19.4 ± 7.4 Gy versus 18.8 ± 7.5 Gy, p < 0.001. The penile bulb showed a decreased delivered mean DMean with 29.1 ± 14.0 Gy versus 29.8 ± 14.4 Gy, p < 0.001. Dorsal DILs, defined as DILs in the posterior medial peripheral zone of the prostate, showed a significantly lower delivered dose with a mean DMean difference of 2.2 Gy (95% CI 1.3–3.1 Gy, p < 0.001) compared to ventral lesions. Conclusions CBCT-based dose accumulation showed an adequate delivered dose to the dominant intraprostatic lesion and organs at risk within planning limits. Cautious evaluation of the target coverage for index lesions adjacent to the rectum is warranted to avoid underdosage.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Schaule ◽  
M. Chamberlain ◽  
L. Wilke ◽  
M. Baumgartl ◽  
J. Krayenbühl ◽  
...  

Abstract Background MR-guided online adaptive stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer aims to reduce toxicity by full compensation of interfractional uncertainties. However, the process of online adaptation currently takes approximately 45 min during which intrafractional movements remain unaccounted for. This study aims to analyze the dosimetric benefit of online adaptation and to evaluate its robustness over the duration of one treatment fraction. Methods Baseline MR-scans at a MR-linear accelerator were acquired for ten healthy male volunteers for generation of mock-prostate SBRT plans with a dose prescription of 5 × 7.25 Gy. On a separate day, online MR-guided adaptation (ViewRay® MRIdian) was performed, and thereafter MR images were acquired every 15 min for 1 h to assess the stability of the adapted plan. Results A dosimetric benefit of online MR-guided adaptive re-planning was observed in 90% of volunteers. The median D95CTV- and D95PTV-coverage was improved from 34.8 to 35.5 Gy and from 30.7 to 34.6 Gy, respectively. Improved target coverage was not associated with higher dose to the organs at risk, most importantly the rectum (median D1ccrectum baseline plan vs. adapted plan 33.3 Gy vs. 32.3 Gy). The benefit of online adaptation remained stable over 45 min for all volunteers. However, at 60 min, CTV-coverage was below a threshold of 32.5 Gy in 30% of volunteers (30.6 Gy, 32.0 Gy, 32.3 Gy). Conclusion The dosimetric benefit of MR-guided online adaptation for prostate SBRT was robust over 45 min in all volunteers. However, intrafractional uncertainties became dosimetrically relevant at 60 min and we therefore recommend verification imaging before delivery of MR-guided online adapted SBRT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document