Diabetes mellitus in childhood and young adult cancer survivors: A meta-analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24101-e24101
Author(s):  
Igal Kushnir ◽  
Dominika Bhatia ◽  
Amirrtha Srikanthan ◽  
Iliana Lega

e24101 Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) has emerged as a possible late sequela after successfully treating pediatric and young adult (YA) malignancies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to quantify this risk and assess possible risk factors. Methods: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to April 2019. We included cohort or case-control studies that reported the risk of DM (hazard ratio [HR], relative risk, or odds ratio, and 95% confidence interval [CI]) among childhood and YA cancer survivors ( < age 21 years) compared to those without a history of childhood or YA cancer. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Score (NOS) to assess risk of bias and study quality. Study effect estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Results: After applying our exclusion/inclusion criteria, we included 6 articles in our meta-analysis, with a median follow-up time of 11 (range 10-23) years. The median NOS score was 8 (range 7 – 8), indicating high study quality. The risk of DM was significantly higher in childhood and YA cancer survivors relative to controls (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.54 to 1.79, I2 = 1%). Among cancer types, the highest risk for DM was reported after treatment for leukemia (HR 2.91, 95% CI 2.01 to 4.22 I2 = 75%), lymphoma (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.37 to 1.94, I2 = 0%) and central nervous system malignancies (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.39, I2 = 49%), relative to controls. Receiving total body irradiation or abdominal radiation was associated with a DM risk of 4.52 (95% CI 2.29 to 8.93, I2 = 87%), relative to controls. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis demonstrated an increased risk of developing DM among childhood and YA cancer survivors. More emphasis on screening for DM and prevention among this population should be offered.

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nutthaporn Chandeying ◽  
Therdpong Thongseiratch

Objective: Over the last 10 years, online interventions to improve mental health have increased significantly. This study's primary objective was to determine the effectiveness of online interventions in improving the mental health of pediatric, adolescent, and young adult (PAYA) cancer survivors. The secondary objective was to identify the independent variables associated with online intervention efficacy for mental health improvement.Methods: On June 25–30, 2021, we searched the Medline, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for eligible English language publications that reported randomized controlled trials of online interventions aimed at improving mental health among PAYA cancer survivors. The results were analyzed using a systematic review and a three-level meta-analysis.Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. In six (42%) studies, the intervention focused on physical activity enhancement, while ten (77%) studies used self-directed interventions. Online interventions were more efficacious, compared to control conditions, in improving sleep g = 0.35 (95% CI 0.04–0.66) and psychological well-being g = 0.32 (95% CI 0.09–0.56), but not for reducing the symptoms of depression g = 0.17 (95% CI −0.13 to 0.47), anxiety g = 0.05 (95% CI −0.15 to 0.25), and pain g = 0.13 (95% CI −0.13 to 0.39).Conclusion: Online interventions were generally effective in improving mental health in PAYA cancer survivors, although negative results were found in some critical outcomes. More high-quality evidence is needed for definite conclusions to be drawn. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021266276).


Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 125 (11) ◽  
pp. 1908-1917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler G. Ketterl ◽  
Karen L. Syrjala ◽  
Jacqueline Casillas ◽  
Linda A. Jacobs ◽  
Steven C. Palmer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document