Decreased fracture rate by mandating bone protecting agents in the EORTC 1333/PEACEIII trial combining Ra223 with enzalutamide versus enzalutamide alone: An updated safety analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5002-5002
Author(s):  
Silke Gillessen ◽  
Ananya Choudhury ◽  
Alejo Rodriguez-Vida ◽  
Franco Nole ◽  
Enrique Gallardo Diaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Safety Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Fracture Rate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Continuous Administration ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Radium 223 ◽  
Safety Population

5002 Background: The randomized phase III EORTC-1333-GUCG (NCT02194842) trial compares enzalutamide vs. a combination of Radium 223 and enzalutamide in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. The premature unblinding of ERA223 (NCT02043678) in Nov 2017 due to a significant increase in the rate of fractures in the combination of abiraterone and Ra223 arm led to the implementation of the mandatory use of bone protecting agents (BPA) in the EORTC-1333-GUCG trial. Skeletal fractures, pathological or not, are a frequent and underestimated adverse event of systemic treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Whether this mandated use of BPA (zoledronic acid or denosumab) would mitigate the risk of fractures in this patient population was unclear. An early safety analysis (Tombal, ASCO, 2019) suggested that the risk of fractures was well controlled in both arms when patients receive BPA. We present here an updated analysis of fracture incidence with longer follow-up. Methods: As of 28/01/2021, a total of 253 patients (134 after making BPA mandatory) were randomized between enzalutamide/Ra223 and enzalutamide. The fracture rate was estimated with the cumulative incidence method in the safety population of 237 (122 after making BPA mandatory) treated patients. Death in absence of fracture was analyzed as competing risk and censoring was applied at last follow-up. Results: Overall, 69.5% of enzalutamide/Ra223 patients (95.2% after making BPA mandatory) and 73.1% of enzalutamide patients (95% after making BPA mandatory) received BPA on treatment: 13.6% in the enzalutamide/Ra223 arm and 21.8% in the enzalutamide arm did not use BPA at registration, but started during protocol treatment and 55.9% and 51.3% respectively, received BPA since entry. At 36.7 months median follow-up in patients without BPA and 23.1 months median follow-up in patients receiving BPA, a total of 39 patients reported a fracture. Among them, 30 patients (20 in enzalutamide/Ra223 arm) did not receive BPA and 9 (4 in the enzalutamide/Ra223 arm) received BPA (see table). Conclusions: The updated safety analysis confirms the early fracture rate results. In the absence of BPA, the risk of fracture is increased when RA223 is added to enzalutamide. Strikingly, in both arms, the risk remains almost abolished by a preventive continuous administration of BPA, thus stressing the importance of complying to international recommendations in terms of giving BPA to mCRPC patients. This study is sponsored by EORTC and supported by Bayer and Astellas. Clinical trial information: NCT02194842. [Table: see text]

Decreased fracture rate by mandating bone-protecting agents in the EORTC 1333/PEACE III trial comparing enzalutamide and Ra223 versus enzalutamide alone: An interim safety analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5007-5007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand F. Tombal ◽  
Yohann Loriot ◽  
Fred Saad ◽  
Raymond S. McDermott ◽  
Tony Elliott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Fracture Rate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Continuous Administration ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Safety Population ◽  
Clinical Detail ◽  
Bone Protection ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

5007 Background: Skeletal fractures, pathological or not, are a frequent and underestimated side-effect of systemic treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The ERA223 trial (NCT02043678) was recently unblinded following the report of a significant increase in the fracture rates when abiraterone is combined with Ra223. Hence, FDA and EMA advised against this combination. The question whether mandated use of bone protecting agents (BPA), zoledronic acid or denosumab, would have mitigated the fracture risk and whether this risk also exists in the enzalutamide/Ra223 combination is presently unknown. Methods: The phase III EORTC-1333-GUCG/PEACEIII (NCT02194842) trial compares enzalutamide vs. a combination of Ra223 and enzalutamide in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic mCRPC patients (https://www.eortc.org/research_field/clinical-detail/1333/). After the unblinding of ERA223, the trial was amended (v4.0, April 19, 2018) to mandate that all patients must start a BPA. We report the fracture rate in the safety population of 146 treated patients as of 28/01/2019. Results: Overall, 54.2% of the patients in the enza/Ra223 arm and 51.4% of the enza arm did not receive BPA; 18.0% in the enza/Ra223 arm and 27.0% in the enza arm did not use BPA at randomization, but started during protocol treatment according to the v4.0 amendment. 27.8% and 21.6% respectively, received BPA as of randomization. In total, 45.8% of enza/Ra223 patients and 48.6% of enza only patients receive bone protection on treatment. The fracture rate is reported in the table. Conclusions: There is a 13% risk of fracture with enzalutamide in asymptomatic mCRPC, in line with previous reports. This risk is significantly increased to 33% when Ra223 is added to enzalutamide. Strikingly, the risk is almost abolished by mandatory continuous administration of BPA starting at least 6 weeks before the first injection of Ra223, thus emphasizing the importance of treating mCRPC patients with BPA. Clinical trial information: NCT02194842. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Re‐treatment with radium‐223: 2‐year follow‐up from an international, open‐label, phase 1/2 study in patients with castration‐resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases

The Prostate ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 79 (14) ◽  
pp. 1683-1691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Sartor ◽  
Daniel Heinrich ◽  
Neil Mariados ◽  
Maria José Méndez Vidal ◽  
Daniel Keizman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Radium 223 ◽  
Open Label Phase

Novel therapies and emerging strategies for the treatment of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Mukherji ◽  
Aurelius Omlin ◽  
Carmel Pezaro ◽  
Johann De Bono
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Trial Participation ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Radium 223 ◽  
New Treatments ◽  
Phase Iii Studies ◽  
Clinical And Translational Research

Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) represents a final stage of this malignancy for many men and is defined as the progression of prostate cancer despite castrate levels of testosterone. CRPC may present as a rising PSA, the development of new metastases, or worsening of known metastases. Recent advances have resulted in five new treatments for CRPC: the immunotherapy sipuleucel-T; the cytotoxic cabazitaxel; the androgen biosynthesis inhibitor abiraterone acetate; the radioisotope radium-223; and the antiandrogen enzalutamide. These have all improved overall survival in randomized phase III studies for patients with metastatic CRPC. Furthermore, multiple agents and combinations are currently in late-stage clinical testing. Men with advanced prostate cancer represent an important population for clinical and translational research and clinical trial participation should be considered as part of standard care.

State-of-the-Art Management for the Patient with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in 2012

2012 ◽  
pp. 289-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Sartor
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Optimal Sequence ◽  
Molecular Stratification ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Radium 223 ◽  
Phase Iii Trials

Overview: Much progress has been made in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and multiple new U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved survival-prolonging drugs are now available. In 2004, docetaxel/prednisone was the first therapy shown to prolong survival. In 2010 and 2011, sipuleucel-T, cabazitaxel/prednisone, and abiraterone/prednisone were FDA approved. Two new agents, radium-223 and MDV-3100, have recently reported large phase III trials prolonging overall survival and will be submitted for regulatory approval in 2012. One can now begin to ask, is there an optimal sequence for therapies in metastatic CRPC? Despite the recent progress, there is much we do not know and virtually no information on this important question. We know that abiraterone/prednisone and cabazitaxel/prednisone are appropriate choices for a patient after receiving docetaxel, but we do not know what, if anything, represents the optimal sequence for abiraterone and cabazitaxel. In fact we do not understand how one therapy may affect the response to a subsequent therapy. We are also aware that the pre- and postdocetaxel spaces represent regulatory rather than biologic divisions. In addition, despite the proven role of docetaxel/prednisone, many patients with CRPC are not considered to be suitable for chemotherapy, and worldwide many never receive any form of chemotherapy. What is the optimal management for these patients? Taken together it is reasonable to assess patient preferences, prior therapies and response/tolerance to prior therapies, burden of disease, comorbidities, current symptoms, drug toxicities, out-of-pocket costs, etc., in clinical decision making. Given the many factors we do not know, it is hard to be dogmatic in approaching the therapeutic options for the patient with CRPC. We will likely soon move beyond the current sequencing paradigm and begin to assess new combinations in a systematic and rational fashion. Perhaps one day, in the not too distant future, we will develop molecular “stratification systems” to better guide therapeutic choices in CRPC.

Recent Developments in Treatments for Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer—A Mechanistic Perspective

2012 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. 89
Author(s):  
Guru Sonpavde ◽  
E David Crawford ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Microtubule Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Radium 223

Over the past decade, the treatment landscape in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) has markedly changed, with the introduction of three new chemotherapeutic agents. The mechanism of CRPC is not fully understood, but it may result from multiple pathways, including a loss or androgen receptor (AR) specificity and increased downstream signalling activity that provide multiple targets for therapeutic agents. For some years, docetaxel was the mainstay of treatment in CRPC, but recently, cabazitaxel (a microtubule inhibitor), sipuleucel-T (a cancer vaccine), and abiraterone acetate (a CYP17 inhibitor) were approved for CRPC treatment. In Phase III clinical trials, these agents have shown significant improvements in survival—over mitoxantrone (for cabazitaxel) and over placebo (for sipuleucel-T and abiraterone acetate)—and were well tolerated. There are also two treatments in late-stage development, MDV3100 (an oral AR antagonist) and radium-223 (an isotope that creates breaks in double-stranded DNA). These have also shown improvements in survival in Phase III trials; their regulatory approval is expected soon. The modes of actions of the existing and new drugs in CRPC are varied, but some are complementary and investigations of different combinations of these medications are much needed; they may enhance efficacy, further extend survival, and improve outcomes in this formerly untreatable disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document