Surgical outcomes for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer at facilities with stereotactic body radiation therapy programs.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8538-8538
Author(s):  
Yusef Syed ◽  
William A. Stokes ◽  
Onkar Khullar ◽  
Nikhil Sebastian ◽  
Manali Rupji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy ◽  
Operative Mortality ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Early Stage Nsclc ◽  
Interaction Testing

8538 Background: Patients undergoing surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may be at high-risk for post-operative mortality. Access to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) offers a less invasive alternative for this population that may facilitate more appropriate patient selection for surgery. Methods: An analysis of all patients with early-stage NSCLC reported to the National Cancer Database between 2004-2015 was performed. Post-operative mortality rates were derived using vital status data. Utilization of SBRT was defined by each facility’s SBRT Experience in years and SBRT-to-Surgery volume ratios, defined by quartiles. Multivariable logistic regression with backward elimination was used to test for independence of associations between exposures of interest and post-operative mortality. Interaction testing was performed to assess the statistical relationship of covariates found to have independent associations. Results: The study cohort consisted of 202,542 patients who underwent surgical resection of clinical stage T1-T2 NSCLC (AJCC 7th edition). The 90-day post-operative mortality rate declined significantly during the study period from 4.6% to 2.6% (p < 0.001). During this period, the proportion of facilities that utilized SBRT increased from 3.3% to 77.5% (p < 0.001) and the proportion of patients treated with SBRT increased significantly from 0.7% to 15.4% (p < 0.001). Lower 90-day post-operative mortality rates were observed at facilities with greater than six years of SBRT experience (OR 0.84, CI 0.76-0.94, p = 0.003) and SBRT-to-Surgery volume ratios above 17% (OR 0.85, CI 0.79-0.92, p < 0.001). Additional covariates associated with 90-day mortality included higher surgical volume, geographic region, year of diagnosis, age, sex, race, insurance status, facility type, Charlson-Deyo score, clinical T stage, histology, anatomic location, surgery type, and prior malignancy. Interaction testing between these covariates was negative, demonstrating that higher SBRT Experience and SBRT-to-Surgery volume ratios were independently associated with lower 90-day surgical mortality. Conclusions: Patients who underwent surgery for early-stage NSCLC at facilities with higher SBRT Experience and SBRT-to-Surgery volume ratios had lower rates of post-operative mortality. These findings suggest that the availability of SBRT may be a surrogate for a more comprehensive and safer approach to matching patients to surgery or SBRT. The observation of higher post-operative mortality rates at facilities without an SBRT program deserves further study.

scholarly journals Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus surgery for patients with early-stage non–small cell lung cancer( ≤ 5cm): A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yueling Zhou ◽  
Ping Wen ◽  
Yue Yu ◽  
Zhenyi Yang ◽  
Yixuan Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Early Stage Nsclc

Abstract Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is considered as the preferred treatment method for inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is still a debate on the efficacy of SBRT and surgery. This meta-analysis aimed to compare survival outcomes of SBRT and surgery for early-stage NSCLC (≤5cm).Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare survival outcomes of surgery and SBRT. And the pooled analysis was conducted with STATA 14.0 software. Results: Thirty-nine comparative studies were included for systematic review and twenty-eight of which for quantitative analysis. Compared with SBRT, overall survival (OS) was superior after surgical resection, included lobectomy, sublobar resection, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, and thoracotomy, for patients with early-stage NSCLC (≤5cm). And the results of subgroup analysis remained the support of surgery except for the OS of operable matched cohorts and the one matched cohort of age ≥75. However, the HR of OS showed a reduction from patients with unspecific age, ≥65 to ≥75 years old and histopathologically confirmed NSCLC to clinical NSCLC. Although cancer-specific survival and local control was superior after surgery, the recurrence rate of tumors, locoregional control, distant control, and regional control of matched patients demonstrated no significantly different outcomes between SBRT and surgery for early-stage NSCLC.Conclusions: Results show that surgery has superior OS, CSS and local control compared to SBRT for early-stage NSCLC. There is still necessary to explore the survival difference between SBRT and surgery for patients with different characteristics by large-sample, long-term follow-up randomized clinical studies.

scholarly journals Stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non–small-cell lung cancer in octogenarians and older: an alternative treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 586-593
Author(s):  
Yanping Bei ◽  
Naoya Murakami ◽  
Yuko Nakayama ◽  
Kae Okuma ◽  
Tairo Kashihara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Early Stage Nsclc ◽  
Lung Sbrt

ABSTRACT Surgery is the standard modality for early-stage I–II non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Generally, patients who are &gt;80 years old tend to have more comorbidities and inferior physical status than younger patients. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may provide an alternative treatment for this group of patients. Here, we report our experience using SBRT to in the management of early-stage NSCLC in patients &gt;80 years old. Patients aged ≥80 years old who were diagnosed with early-stage NSCLC and treated with definitive lung SBRT from January 2000 to January 2018 were retrospectively analysed. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related toxicities were analysed for patients &gt;80 years old. A total of 153 patients were included, with a median age of 85 years (range, 80–94). The median follow-up period and OS was 39.8 months (range, 10–101 months) and 76 months, respectively. The 3-year OS, PFS, CSS, RRFS and LRFS were 65.3, 58.0, 75.7, 73.9 and 85.3%, respectively. Radiation pneumonitis grade 0–1, grade 2, grade 3 and grade 4 was observed in 135 (88.2%), 13 (8.5%), 4 (2.61%) and 1 (0.6%) patient(s), respectively. On multivariate analyses, tumor size, pretreatment C-reactive protein (CRP) value, histology and pretreatment physical state were significantly associated with OS. Definitive lung SBRT appears to have high LRFS and OS without causing high-grade radiation-related toxicities in early-stage NSCLC patients who were &gt;80 years old.

scholarly journals Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Mitigates Radiation Induced Lymphopenia in Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark McLaughlin ◽  
Morshed Alam ◽  
Lynette Smith ◽  
Jeffrey Ryckman ◽  
Chi Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Early Stage Nsclc ◽  
Radiation Induced

Abstract Background Radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) occurs during treatment with conventional radiation in multiple organ sites. Development of RIL portends poor prognosis. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) spares RIL in pancreatic cancer, but has not been examined in other sites commonly treated with SBRT. This work examines if SBRT similarly spares RIL in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Retrospective analysis was done at a single institution on 40 distinct cases of SBRT for early stage NSCLC from 2006-2017. Incidentally collected lymphocyte counts collected within 6 months of SBRT treatment were analyzed to determine if RIL occurred. The presence of RIL was correlated with location of initial failure and survival endpoints. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed with significance defined at the level p = 0.05. Results RIL was observed in 35% of the analyzed patients. Patterns of failure and survival data were comparable to prior SBRT literature. There was no observed association in two year local, nodal, or distant failure, progression free survival, or overall survival based on the presence of RIL. Conclusions SBRT spares RIL in NSCLC compared to historical rates observed with conventionally fractionated radiation. As understanding of the role of the immune system in cancer control continues to evolve, the importance of RIL sparing techniques take on increasing importance. This study represents the first analysis of RIL sparing in SBRT in an early stage NSCLC cohort without the confounding influence of chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Stereotactic body radiation therapy mitigates radiation induced lymphopenia in early stage non-small cell lung cancer

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0241505
Author(s):  
Mark F. McLaughlin ◽  
Morshed Alam ◽  
Lynnette Smith ◽  
Jeffrey Ryckman ◽  
Chi Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Early Stage Nsclc ◽  
Radiation Induced

Introduction Radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) occurs during treatment with conventional radiation in multiple organ sites. Development of RIL portends poor prognosis. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) spares RIL in pancreatic cancer, but has not been examined in other sites commonly treated with SBRT. This work examines if SBRT similarly spares RIL in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and methods Retrospective analysis was done at a single institution on 40 distinct cases of SBRT for early stage NSCLC from 2006–2017. Incidentally collected lymphocyte counts collected within 6 months of SBRT treatment were analyzed to determine if RIL occurred. The presence of RIL was correlated with location of initial failure and survival endpoints. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed with significance defined at the level p < 0.05. Results RIL was observed in 35% of the analyzed patients. Patterns of failure and survival data were comparable to prior SBRT literature. There was no observed association in two year local, nodal, or distant failure, progression free survival, or overall survival based on the presence of RIL. Discussion SBRT spares RIL in NSCLC compared to historical rates observed with conventionally fractionated radiation. As understanding of the role of the immune system in cancer control continues to evolve, the importance of RIL sparing techniques take on increasing importance. This study represents further analysis of RIL sparing in SBRT in an early stage NSCLC cohort without the confounding influence of chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Nonradiotherapeutic Ablative Procedures (Laser/Cryoablation and Electrocautery) for Early-Stage Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 450-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Baine ◽  
Richard Sleightholm ◽  
Beth K. Neilsen ◽  
David Oupický ◽  
Lynette M. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Early Stage Nsclc ◽  
Ablative Procedures

Background: Despite the fact that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the only recommended first-line therapy for inoperable early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), several thermal ablative procedures (TAPs; defined herein as laser/cryoablation and electrocautery) are available. Studies showing outcomes of these procedures and how they compare with SBRT are scarce. We sought to evaluate the comparative efficacy of SBRT versus TAPs using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods: The NCDB was queried for patients with early-stage NSCLC who did not undergo surgical resection. Treatment-specific inclusion criteria were applied to select for patients receiving either TAPs or SBRT. Univariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards modeling were performed, and Kaplan-Meier curves were generated. Serial propensity matches were performed using a modified greedy 8→n matching 1:1 algorithm. Results: A total of 27,734 patients were analyzed; 26,725 underwent SBRT and 1,009 underwent TAPs. Patients who received SBRT were older and more likely to have clinical stage IB (vs IA) disease. Despite this, SBRT was associated with longer median overall survival (mOS; 37.7 vs 33.5 months; P=.001) and 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates compared with the TAPs cohort (86.7% vs 83.1%, 67.5% vs 62.7%, and 30.6% vs 26.9%, respectively; P=.001). Upon propensity matching, improved OS with SBRT remained, with a mOS of 40.4 versus 33.4 months and 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates of 89.0% versus 82.9%, 69.7% versus 62.7%, and 34.4% versus 26.4%, respectively (P=.003). Conclusions: Despite being associated with more higher-risk factors, SBRT was associated with higher OS compared with TAPs for treatment of nonoperative patients diagnosed with early-stage NSCLC. However, causation cannot be implied owing to the inherent limitations of large heterogeneous datasets such as the NCDB.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document