Disparity between the use of postoperative psychosocial and physical services among older adults with head and neck cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24016-e24016
Author(s):  
Gabriel T. Raab ◽  
Daniel Restifo ◽  
Amy L. Tin ◽  
Kaveh Zakeri ◽  
Armin Shahrokni

e24016 Background: It is unclear whether older adults undergoing head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery have significant functional and mental health impairments perioperatively. We examined postoperative physical, nutritional and psychosocial service use among a cohort of older adults with HNC co-managed by geriatricians and surgeons. Methods: Our sample consisted of older adults who were referred to the Geriatrics Service at MSKCC between 2015-2019 and took a geriatric assessment (GA) prior to undergoing HNC surgery. Physical, nutritional and psychosocial service utilization during the patient’s stay was assessed. Physical services included a physical, occupational or rehabilitation consult. Nutritional services consisted of speech and swallow or nutritional consult. Psychosocial services consisted of a psychiatry, psychology, or social work consult. All patients were comanaged by geriatricians and surgeons. Relationships between each service use, all 12 geriatric deficits, demographic, and surgical characteristics were assessed using chi-squared analysis and t-test for continuous variables. Results: 159 patients (median age 81) were included. The median time in the OR was 342 min and the median length of stay (LOS) was 6 days. The most common GA impairments were major distress (61%), depression (59%), Social Activity Limitation (SAL) (53%) and deficits in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (44%). Nutritional and physical services were used much more frequently than psychosocial services (79% and 85% vs 31%; p=.01 and p=.003, respectively). Lower ADL, increasing OR time and LOS were statistically associated with utilization of the three services and SAL was associated with a greater proportion of physical and psychosocial consults (Table). No demographic characteristics were associated with any of the services. Only 38% of patients with major distress and 40% of patients with depression had a mental health consult. In comparison, 93% of patients with an abnormal TUG had a physical consult and 92% of patients with weight loss greater than 10 pounds prior to surgery got a nutritional consult. Conclusions: Many older adults with head and neck cancer experience aging-related impairments. Physical impairments are more commonly addressed than psychosocial impairments. Future studies should aim to identify and overcome barriers to addressing psychosocial issues in HNC patients. [Table: see text]

Author(s):  
Ronald J. Maggiore ◽  
Noam VanderWalde ◽  
Melissa Crawley

2012 ◽  
Vol 147 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P56-P56
Author(s):  
Christopher E. Fundakowski ◽  
Pascal Jean-Pierre ◽  
Zoukaa Sargi

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. S29
Author(s):  
J. Woersching ◽  
J. Van Cleave ◽  
B. Schmidt ◽  
J. Gonsky ◽  
K. Alexis ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 43-43
Author(s):  
Natalie Riblet ◽  
Karen Skalla ◽  
Alison Peterson ◽  
Auden McClure ◽  
Karen Homa ◽  
...  

43 Background: To better address the emotional needs of cancer patients by improving mental health care in Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) Medical oncology at Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, through implementing an evidence-based process for identifying and managing psychological distress. Methods: Using quality improvement methods, mental health care in HNC Medical Oncology was evaluated and revised November 2010 through April 2012. In January 2011, a two-component intervention was put into routine care including 1) the validated National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) distress thermometer (DT) and 2) a treatment decision algorithm. A licensed nursing assistant administered the DT and providers reviewed results as part of the clinical exam. Heightened distress was defined as a score of ≥ 4. Screening processes were improved through Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Results: Prior to January 2011, identification of distress was based on provider’s clinical assessment. Of 104 patients seen between November 2010 and January 2011, 25% (26) were diagnosed with psychological problems. Cause-effect diagraming suggested that lack of a formalized process for distress assessment contributed to missed diagnoses. Providers were unfamiliar with mental health resources. As reported in Psycho-Oncology 21(Suppl. 1): 51(2012) after implementing process changes, bi-weekly distress screening rates rose from 0% to 38% between January and July 2011. With additional PDSA cycles, these rates increased to 74% between October 2011 and April 2012. Similar to proposed benchmarks, 84% (47) of newly diagnosed patients (56) were assessed for distress. Furthermore, of 138 unique patients seen, 71% (98) were screened for distress and 47% (46) of these had heightened distress. Providers addressed the needs of all those identified. Improvement was attributed to the empowerment of staff and participation of senior leadership. Barriers included a heavy reliance on the presence of trained staff. Conclusions: Quality improvement methods can be applied to the cancer setting in order to create systems of care, which more reliably identify and address distress. Teams, however, must be invested in the work and receive support from senior leadership.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10040-10040
Author(s):  
Matthew Vincent Neve ◽  
Michael B. Jameson ◽  
Siva Govender ◽  
Cristian Hartopeanu

Cancer ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 121 (12) ◽  
pp. 2083-2089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitriona B. O'Neill ◽  
Shrujal S. Baxi ◽  
Coral L. Atoria ◽  
James P. O'Neill ◽  
Martin C. Henman ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 457-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Neve ◽  
Michael B. Jameson ◽  
Siva Govender ◽  
Cristian Hartopeanu

Author(s):  
Wojciech Dudek ◽  
Emad AlMoussa ◽  
Waldemar Schreiner ◽  
Konstantinos Mantsopoulos ◽  
Horia Sirbu

Abstract Background There is no consensus on the value of pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) for head and neck cancer (HNC). The aim of our single-institution study was to evaluate outcomes and to examine factors influencing 5-year survival of patients undergoing resections for HNC lung metastases. Methods All HNC patients undergoing curative-intent PM between January 2008 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The impact of factors related to primary tumor, metastases, and associated therapy on patient survival was evaluated using the univariable Cox proportional hazard model. Cutoff values of continuous variables were determined by a receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results In total, 44 patients (32 males and 12 females, with a median age of 65 years) underwent PM for metastatic HNC. There was one perioperative death, and major complications occurred in 2 (4.5%) patients. The median interval between the treatment of primary tumor and PM was 19.4 months (range: 0–151 months). Median size of the largest resected pulmonary lesion was 1.3 cm (range: 0.3–6.9 cm). Mean follow-up was 21 months (range: 0–123 months), and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate after the first PM was 41%. Resection was complete (R0) in all patients. Larger size of pulmonary metastasis (≥1.4 cm; hazard ratio: 4.49; 95% confidence interval: 1.79–11.27) was a significantly negative prognostic factor. Conclusion Despite the lack of randomized controlled trials, PM for HNC is a reasonable therapeutic option with favorable survival in a selected population. In patients with larger pulmonary lesions, shorter OS after PM is to be expected.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document