scholarly journals Bayesian Approaches to Subgroup Analysis and Related Adaptive Clinical Trial Designs

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Ciara Nugent ◽  
Wentian Guo ◽  
Peter Müller ◽  
Yuan Ji

We review Bayesian and Bayesian decision theoretic approaches to subgroup analysis and applications to subgroup-based adaptive clinical trial designs. Subgroup analysis refers to inference about subpopulations with significantly distinct treatment effects. The discussion mainly focuses on inference for a benefiting subpopulation, that is, a characterization of a group of patients who benefit from the treatment under consideration more than the overall population. We introduce alternative approaches and demonstrate them with a small simulation study. Then, we turn to clinical trial designs. When the selection of the interesting subpopulation is carried out as the trial proceeds, the design becomes an adaptive clinical trial design, using subgroup analysis to inform the randomization and assignment of treatments to patients. We briefly review some related designs. There are a variety of approaches to Bayesian subgroup analysis. Practitioners should consider the type of subpopulations in which they are interested and choose their methods accordingly. We demonstrate how subgroup analysis can be carried out by different Bayesian methods and discuss how they identify slightly different subpopulations.

Author(s):  
Jeffrey L. Cummings ◽  
Kate Zhong

This chapter describes the common therapeutic targets, approaches to clinical trial design, biomarkers, and therapeutic interventions across neurodegenerative disorders (NDDs). Each unique NDD-Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), etc.-has a unique phenotype associated with the regional cell population most affected. Each disease, however, is associated with protein misfolding, oxidation, inflammation, apoptosis, and cell death. If vulnerable cell populations include transmitter source nuclei, transmitter deficits also emerge (e.g. cholinergic abnormalities in AD and dopaminergic deficits in PD). Biomarkers show regionally appropriate brain atrophy or process-related cerebrospinal deficits. Clinical trial designs share features for symptomatic interventions (e.g. cholinesterase inhibitors in AD and dopamine agents in PD) and disease-modifying therapies. Biomarkers play similar roles in trials for NDD, including demonstrating target engagement and supporting disease modification. No disease-modifying therapies have been approved for any NDDs; all programs face similar pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and regulatory challenges in therapeutic development.


1997 ◽  
Vol 92 (437) ◽  
pp. 384 ◽  
Author(s):  
William F. Rosenberger ◽  
Joseph B. Kadane

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document