Detector Selection Factors

2004 ◽  
pp. 103-111
Keyword(s):  
Selection Factors

Speech Therapy Services in a Large School System: A Six-Year Overview

1976 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 207-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constance P. DesRoches
Keyword(s):  
School System ◽  
Speech Therapy ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Case Load ◽  
Number Of Children ◽  
School Population ◽  
System A ◽  
Therapy Services ◽  
And Shifts ◽  
Selection Factors

A statistical review provides analysis of four years of speech therapy services of a suburban school system which can be used for comparison with other school system programs. Included are data on the percentages of the school population enrolled in therapy, the categories of disabilities and the number of children in each category, the sex and grade-level distribution of those in therapy, and shifts in case-load selection. Factors affecting changes in case-load profiles are identified and discussed.

scholarly journals Long-term effectiveness of faecal immunochemical test screening for proximal and distal colorectal cancers

Gut ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. gutjnl-2020-322545
Author(s):  
Han-Mo Chiu ◽  
Grace Hsiao-Hsuan Jen ◽  
Ying-Wei Wang ◽  
Jean Ching-Yuan Fann ◽  
Chen-Yang Hsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Distal Colon ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Proximal Colon ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Faecal Immunochemical Test ◽  
Immunochemical Test ◽  
Selection Factors

ObjectiveTo measure the effects of faecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening on overall and site-specific long-term effectiveness of population-based organised service screening.DesignA prospective cohort study of Taiwanese nationwide biennial FIT screening was performed. A total of 5 417 699 eligible subjects were invited to attend screening from 2004 through 2009 and were followed up until 2014. We estimated the adjusted relative rates (aRRs) on the effectiveness of reducing advanced-stage CRC (stage II+) and CRC death by Bayesian Poisson regression models with the full adjustment for a cascade of self-selection factors (including the screening rate and the colonoscopy rate) and the completeness of colonoscopy together with demographic features.ResultsFIT screening (exposed vs unexposed) reduced the incidence of advanced-stage CRC (48.4 vs 75.7 per 100 000) and mortality (20.3 vs 41.3 per 100 000). Statistically significant reductions of both incidence of advanced-stage CRCs (aRR=0.66, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.70) and deaths from CRC (aRR=0.60, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.64) were noted. FIT screening was more effective in reducing distal advanced-stage CRCs (aRR=0.61, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.64) and CRC mortality (aRR=0.56, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.69) than proximal advanced CRCs (aRR=0.84, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.92) and CRC mortality (aRR=0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.80).ConclusionA large-scale population-based biennial FIT screening demonstrates 34% significant reduction of advanced-stage CRCs and 40% reduction of death from CRC with larger long-term effectiveness in the distal colon than the proximal colon. Our findings provide a strong and consistent evidence-based policy for supporting a sustainable population-based FIT organised service screening worldwide. The disparity of site-specific long-term effectiveness also provides an insight into the remedy for lower effectiveness of FIT screening in the proximal colon.

Treatment selection factors for stereotactic radiosurgery of intracranial metastases

1995 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 1161-1166 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Buatti ◽  
William A. Friedman ◽  
Frank J. Bova ◽  
William M. Mendenhall
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Treatment Selection ◽  
Intracranial Metastases ◽  
Selection Factors

II. The Patient Sample: Overt and Covert Selection Factors and Prognostic Predictions

1981 ◽  
Vol 35 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 96-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.J. Kimm ◽  
Waltraud Bolz ◽  
A.-E. Meyer
Keyword(s):  
Patient Sample ◽  
Selection Factors

Concept drift mining of portfolio selection factors in stock market

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 444-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Hu ◽  
Kang Liu ◽  
Xiangzhou Zhang ◽  
Kang Xie ◽  
Weiqi Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stock Market ◽  
Portfolio Selection ◽  
Concept Drift ◽  
Selection Factors

scholarly journals Patient and physician perspectives guiding intra-articular treatment choice in knee osteoarthritis: stakeholders are aligned on treatment priorities but have different assessments of treatment effect

2021 ◽  
pp. jisakos-2020-000578
Author(s):  
Vandana Menon ◽  
Caroline Huber ◽  
Alexandria Portelli ◽  
Marissa Baker-Wagner ◽  
Scott Kelley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Symptom Relief ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Treatment Needs ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Selection Factors

ObjectivesKnee osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of health-related disability. In the absence of curative non-operative therapies, treatment goals are limited to symptom relief. Data are limited on how patients and physicians prioritise available treatment options. We assessed patients’ preferences for and physicians’ attitudes towards intra-articular treatments including corticosteroids (IACS), an extended-release corticosteroid (TA-ER) and hyaluronic acids (IAHA).MethodsWe conducted a prospective, IRB-exempt, double-blind survey of patients with and providers who treat knee OA. Respondents were required to have received or prescribed TA-ER in a non-trial setting. We evaluated patients’ OA history, impact of knee OA and treatment preferences, and physicians’ decision-making and prescribing experiences.ResultsOf the 97 patient participants, mean age was 56 years, 70.0% were women, 75.0% had bilateral knee OA and 46.4% were diagnosed over 5 years ago. Of the 50 physician participants, 34.0% were rheumatologists, 42.0% were orthopaedic surgeons and 60.0%, on average, treat 50+ patients with knee OA per month. Treatment selection factors considered ‘very important’ to patients and physicians included disease severity (88.7%, 82.0%), impact on quality of life (88.7%, 72.0%), disease extent (84.5%, 54.0%) and activity level (80.4%, 64.0%). A majority (93.8%) of patients indicated moderate to severe difficulty with their knees. Fewer patients (76.3%) reported shared decision making compared with physicians (92.0%). Half (50.5%) of the patients reported that they experienced months of pain relief with TA-ER, 27.7% with IACS and 18.8% with IAHA. Physician assessments were consistent but estimated a greater duration of treatment effects than that reported by patients across all therapies.ConclusionWhile knee OA has a tremendous impact on patients, there are significant unmet treatment needs. The increasing use of patient-reported outcomes will allow patients and physicians to track pain and functional status over time and across therapies, improving shared decision-making.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document