Statistical Analyses of Microbiological and Environmental Data

2019 ◽  
pp. 307-328
Author(s):  
Alexander V. Semenov
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob W. Dittel ◽  
Christopher M. Moore ◽  
Stephen B. Vander Wall

AbstractLittle is known about how mutualistic interactions affect the distribution of species richness on broad geographic scales. It has been predicted that the richness of species involved in obligate mutualisms should be positively associated across their range. Whereas, if mutualisms are facilitative, the distribution of mutualists should be correlated with other factors. This study is the first study to compare the co-distribution of mutualist species in general and seed dispersal mutualisms specifically. We used geographic distributions of plant and animal mutualists to investigate the co-distribution and patterns of seed dispersal mutualisms. We found the mutualism between dispersers and plants does not account for the distribution of either group. In fact, there is a mismatch of richness between plants and the animals that disperse their seeds. Environmental factors are better predictors of both animal distribution and seed dispersal mutualisms across North America.Statement of authorshipJD, CM, and SV conceived the original project idea. Plant data were compiled and analyzed by CM and SV, and JD compiled animal and environmental data. JD standardized and formatted all geographical data, and JD and CM performed all statistical analyses. JD wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors contributed significantly to the revisions.


1979 ◽  
Vol 57 (8) ◽  
pp. 1693-1709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernadette Pinel-Alloul ◽  
Pierre Legendre ◽  
Etienne Magnin

From June through October 1973, 335 samples of limnetic plankton were collected from 46 lakes and 17 rivers of the James Bay area. Sixty zooplanktonic species were identified (20 Copepoda, 27 Cladocera, and 13 Rotifera). The most common and widespread species are cold stenotherms (Leptodiaptomus minutus, Diacyclops bicuspidatus thomasi, Epischura lacustris, Holopedium gibberum, Bosmina longirostris, Daphnia longiremis, and Kellicottia longispina). In order to study the typology of the lake samples, the data were subjected to three types of statistical analyses: principal components analysis, single linkage, and complete linkage clustering. Five groups of lakes emerged from these analyses: types IV and V are located in the northeastern portion of the studied area, whereas types I and II were identified in the western portion, corresponding with the area occupied by the Tyrrell glacial sea. Type III fills an intermediate position. Types II, III, and V are smalt lakes. The characteristic zooplanktonic communities of each group are described, whereas the principal components and the components of the diversity are correlated with the environmental data.


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 176-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Rauthmann

Abstract. There is as yet no consensually agreed-upon situational taxonomy. The current work addresses this issue and reviews extant taxonomic approaches by highlighting a “road map” of six research stations that lead to the observed diversity in taxonomies: (1) theoretical and conceptual guidelines, (2) the “type” of situational information studied, (3) the general taxonomic approach taken, (4) the generation of situation pools, (5) the assessment and rating of situational information, and (6) the statistical analyses of situation data. Current situational taxonomies are difficult to integrate because they follow different paths along these six stations. Some suggestions are given on how to spur integrated taxonomies toward a unified psychology of situations that speaks a common language.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document