Review of Acid/Base Concepts for Organic Chemistry

2016 ◽  
pp. 193-204
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael N. Petterson ◽  
Field M. Watts ◽  
Emma P. Snyder-White ◽  
Sabrina R. Archer ◽  
Ginger V. Shultz ◽  
...  

Research has demonstrated that students often struggle with learning acid-base reaction mechanisms in organic chemistry. One response is the development of educational applications to support instruction and learning. However, research is needed to characterize how the modality influences students’ thinking about acid-base reaction mechanisms. This study used think-aloud interviews conducted with undergraduate students in their first semester of organic chemistry to understand how they worked through acid-base reactions using either paper-pencil or an app. Analysis of the interviews indicates that students recognize the steps of acid-base reactions, but do not always apply the underlying concepts when determining how a reaction will proceed. The modality somewhat influenced students’ thinking, in that the app prevented students from making chemically unreasonable mistakes. However, some students relied on the cues it provided, which could potentially be problematic when they are required to respond to assessments that do not provide these cues. Our results suggest that instructors should emphasize the conceptual grounding for the rules and steps that govern acid-base reactions to promote chemical thinking about the relationships between the reaction components and how those influence reaction outcomes, as well as support students to think critically about the chemical information contained within the modalities they are using.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Issa I. Salame ◽  
Sagar Patel ◽  
Shafic Suleman

Organic chemistry is often regarded as a difficult subject which deters learners and is associated with poor performance. Our research aims to examine some of the challenges that students face in learning organic chemistry topics related to acid/base and resonance structures theories. For this purpose, organic chemistry exams were analyzed in regards to these troublesome topics. A questionnaire was administered to further understand some of the challenges students face when enrolled in organic chemistry. Our data show that students face several challenges learning these topics and that there is a need to change the way these topics are addressed in instruction.


1964 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 425-441
Author(s):  
Yasuo INOUE ◽  
Koji NAKANISHI
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 878-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael N. Petterson ◽  
Field M. Watts ◽  
Emma P. Snyder-White ◽  
Sabrina R. Archer ◽  
Ginger V. Shultz ◽  
...  

An understanding of acid–base reactions is necessary for success in chemistry courses and relevant to careers outside of chemistry, yet research has demonstrated that students often struggle with learning acid–base reaction mechanisms in organic chemistry. One response to this challenge is the development of educational applications to support instruction and learning. The development of these supports also creates an opportunity to probe students’ thinking about organic chemistry reaction mechanisms using multiple modalities—i.e., using an app interface or the traditional paper–pencil. This study used think-aloud interviews conducted with undergraduate students in their first semester of organic chemistry to understand how they worked through two acid–base reactions using either paper–pencil or an app. Analysis of the interviews indicates that students from both groups recognize the steps of acid–base reactions, but do not always apply the underlying concepts, such as assessment of pKa values or resonance, when determining how a reaction will proceed. The modality seemed to somewhat influence students’ thinking, as the app prevented students from making chemically unreasonable mistakes. However, some students relied on the cues it provided, which could potentially be problematic when they are required to respond to assessments that do not provide these cues. Our results suggest that instructors should emphasize the conceptual grounding for the steps that govern acid–base reactions to promote chemical thinking about the relationships between the reaction components and how those influence reaction outcomes, as well as support students to think critically about the chemical information contained within the modalities they are using.


Author(s):  
Eleni K. Zotos ◽  
Jordan J. Tyo ◽  
Ginger V. Shultz

Many recent studies document the difficulties that students experience when learning organic chemistry, often due to the complex visualization and reasoning skills required to successfully understand the ways molecules interact in specific environments. Many of these studies call on instructors to improve their teaching strategies to support students’ learning of organic chemistry mechanisms, but few have focused on instructors’ knowledge of organic chemistry and how they use their knowledge to teach this topic. To investigate university instructors’ knowledge for teaching organic chemistry mechanisms, we utilized a task-based think-aloud interview protocol where graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) and faculty instructors assessed authentic undergraduate student responses to three organic chemistry mechanism questions. We describe this knowledge for a substitution, an acid–base, and an addition reaction. For all mechanisms, we describe how GTA participants’ knowledge for teaching related to their content knowledge. This result revealed differences between GTA and faculty participants’ knowledge for teaching mechanisms that were specific to features of each mechanistic task. For example, in a substitution reaction question, all faculty participants recognized and explained issues with a student's drawing of a transition state and apparent understanding of partial bonds. These features of the student's drawing were not recognized by any GTA participants, who focused instead on the student's prior knowledge about ionic bonding. These findings qualitatively illuminate strengths and weaknesses in graduate students’ knowledge for teaching which can guide how they are supported as instructors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document