Critical Issues in the Evaluation of Histochemical and Biochemical Methods for Steroid Receptor Analysis *

Author(s):  
Kenneth S. McCarty ◽  
Jr David L. Ingram ◽  
Kenneth S. McCarty Sr.
1991 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 147-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Kommoss ◽  
J. Pfisterer ◽  
H. Geyer ◽  
M. Thome ◽  
W. Sauerbrei ◽  
...  

Ninety-five ovarian neoplasms were studied for ER and PR content by immunohistochemistry, and the results were compared to those of biochemical ER and PR determination in 89 cases. While there was no difference between the results of both methods of hormone receptor determination in the few non-epithelial tumors studied, there was only a low correlation between the semi-quantitative results of ER and PR immunohistochemistry, and the corresponding values of biochemical steroid receptor determination in 77 common epithelial carcinomas of the ovary. In a majority of cases with discordant results between both methods, tumors were hormone receptor positive by DCC analysis but negative by immunohistochemistry. The finding of ER or PR positive stromal cells without any evidence of hormone receptor positive epithelial tumor cells in such tumors offers a possible explanation for the apparent discrepancy. Ovarian carcinomas containing ER or PR positive epithelial tumor cells may constitute a smaller subgroup of all tumors thought to be hormone receptor positive when only results of biochemical methods of steroid receptor determination were available.


1978 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 863-864
Author(s):  
DENNIS UPPER

1983 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-242
Author(s):  
Norman Stephenson ◽  
Oakley Ray

1988 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 833-833
Author(s):  
No authorship indicated
Keyword(s):  

1989 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 872-873
Author(s):  
David L. Shapiro

2020 ◽  
pp. 108-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A. Bryzgalin ◽  
Е. N. Nikishina

The paper investigates cross-cultural differences across Russian regions using the methodology of G. Hofstede. First, it discusses the most common approaches in measuring culture and the application of the Hofstede methodology in subnational studies. It identifies the critical issues in measuring culture at the regional level and suggests several strategies to address them. Secondly, the paper introduces subregional data on individualism and uncertainty avoidance using a survey of students across 27 Russian universities. The data allow to establish geographical patterns of individualism in Russia. It is demonstrated that collectivism is most prevalent in the Volga region, while individualism characteristic becomes stronger towards the Far East. The findings are robust to the inclusion of various controls and different specifications of the regression model. Finally, the paper provides a discussion about the potential of applying the sociocultural approach in economics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document