Additive Outlier Detection in Seasonal ARIMA Models by a Modified Bayesian Information Criterion

2012 ◽  
pp. 317-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Galeano ◽  
Daniel Pena
Keyword(s):  
Outlier Detection ◽  
Bayesian Information Criterion ◽  
Information Criterion ◽  
Arima Models ◽  
Additive Outlier ◽  
Seasonal Arima Models

scholarly journals Deteksi Pencilan pada Model ARIMA dengan Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) Termodifikasi

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-37
Author(s):  
Selma Yulistiani ◽  
Suliadi Suliadi
Keyword(s):  
Model Selection ◽  
Outlier Detection ◽  
Bayesian Information Criterion ◽  
Time Series Data ◽  
Arima Model ◽  
Information Criterion ◽  
Series Data ◽  
Special Events ◽  
Additive Outliers ◽  
Additive Outlier

Time series data may be affected by special events or circumstances such as promotions, natural disasters, etc. These events can lead to inconsistent observations in the series called outliers. Because outliers can make invalid conclusions, it is important to carry out procedures in detecting outlier effects. In outlier detection there is one type of outlier, namely additive outlier (AO). The process of detecting additive outliers in the ARIMA model can be said as a model selection problem, where the candidate model assumes additive outliers at a certain time. In the selection of models there are criteria that must be considered in order to produce the best model. The good criteria for models selection  can use the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) derived by Schwarz (1978). Galeano and Pena (2011) proposed a modified Bayesian Information Criterion for model selection and detect potential outliers. The modified Bayesian Information Criterion for outlier detection will be applied to the data OutStanding Loan PT.Pegadaian Cimahi year 2013-2017. So that the best model is obtained that the model with adding 2 potential outliers with the ARIMA model (1.0,0), that outliers at observations 48, and 58 because it has a minimum BICUP value of 1064.95650.

scholarly journals Modeling of Lake Malombe Annual Fish Landings and Catch per Unit Effort (CPUE)

Forecasting ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-55
Author(s):  
Rodgers Makwinja ◽  
Seyoum Mengistou ◽  
Emmanuel Kaunda ◽  
Tena Alemiew ◽  
Titus Bandulo Phiri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Information Criterion ◽  
Coefficient Of Determination ◽  
Series Data ◽  
Efficiency Coefficient ◽  
Arima Models ◽  
Catch Per Unit Effort ◽  
Annual Fish ◽  
Unit Effort ◽  
The Mean

Forecasting, using time series data, has become the most relevant and effective tool for fisheries stock assessment. Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) modeling has been commonly used to predict the general trend for fish landings with increased reliability and precision. In this paper, ARIMA models were applied to predict Lake Malombe annual fish landings and catch per unit effort (CPUE). The annual fish landings and CPUE trends were first observed and both were non-stationary. The first-order differencing was applied to transform the non-stationary data into stationary. Autocorrelation functions (AC), partial autocorrelation function (PAC), Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), square root of the mean square error (RMSE), the mean absolute error (MAE), percentage standard error of prediction (SEP), average relative variance (ARV), Gaussian maximum likelihood estimation (GMLE) algorithm, efficiency coefficient (E2), coefficient of determination (R2), and persistent index (PI) were estimated, which led to the identification and construction of ARIMA models, suitable in explaining the time series and forecasting. According to the measures of forecasting accuracy, the best forecasting models for fish landings and CPUE were ARIMA (0,1,1) and ARIMA (0,1,0). These models had the lowest values AIC, BIC, RMSE, MAE, SEP, ARV. The models further displayed the highest values of GMLE, PI, R2, and E2. The “auto. arima ()” command in R version 3.6.3 further displayed ARIMA (0,1,1) and ARIMA (0,1,0) as the best. The selected models satisfactorily forecasted the fish landings of 2725.243 metric tons and CPUE of 0.097 kg/h by 2024.

Missing observations in ARIMA models: Skipping approach versus additive outlier approach

1999 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vı́ctor Gómez ◽  
Agustı́n Maravall ◽  
Daniel Peña
Keyword(s):  
Missing Observations ◽  
Arima Models ◽  
Additive Outlier

scholarly journals Model Selection Procedures in Bounds Test of Cointegration: Theoretical Comparison and Empirical Evidence

Economies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waqar Badshah ◽  
Mehmet Bulut
Keyword(s):  
Model Selection ◽  
Akaike Information Criterion ◽  
Bayesian Information Criterion ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Information Criterion ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Information Criteria ◽  
Path Model ◽  
Sample Sizes ◽  
Bounds Test

Only unstructured single-path model selection techniques, i.e., Information Criteria, are used by Bounds test of cointegration for model selection. The aim of this paper was twofold; one was to evaluate the performance of these five routinely used information criteria {Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Akaike Information Criterion Corrected (AICC), Schwarz/Bayesian Information Criterion (SIC/BIC), Schwarz/Bayesian Information Criterion Corrected (SICC/BICC), and Hannan and Quinn Information Criterion (HQC)} and three structured approaches (Forward Selection, Backward Elimination, and Stepwise) by assessing their size and power properties at different sample sizes based on Monte Carlo simulations, and second was the assessment of the same based on real economic data. The second aim was achieved by the evaluation of the long-run relationship between three pairs of macroeconomic variables, i.e., Energy Consumption and GDP, Oil Price and GDP, and Broad Money and GDP for BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) countries using Bounds cointegration test. It was found that information criteria and structured procedures have the same powers for a sample size of 50 or greater. However, BICC and Stepwise are better at small sample sizes. In the light of simulation and real data results, a modified Bounds test with Stepwise model selection procedure may be used as it is strongly theoretically supported and avoids noise in the model selection process.

scholarly journals Prior-based Bayesian information criterion

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Bayarri ◽  
James O. Berger ◽  
Woncheol Jang ◽  
Surajit Ray ◽  
Luis R. Pericchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bayesian Information Criterion ◽  
Information Criterion

scholarly journals Using Model Selection Criteria to Choose the Number of Principal Components

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 450-461
Author(s):  
Stanley L. Sclove
Keyword(s):  
Model Selection ◽  
Principal Components ◽  
Bayesian Information Criterion ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Information Criterion ◽  
Information Criteria ◽  
Akaike's Information Criterion ◽  
Model Selection Criteria ◽  
Adequate Number ◽  
Number Of Principal Components

AbstractThe use of information criteria, especially AIC (Akaike’s information criterion) and BIC (Bayesian information criterion), for choosing an adequate number of principal components is illustrated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document