How to tackle the critical review paper Ashok G Patel

2006 ◽  
pp. 314-314
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 405-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hrvoje Pilko ◽  
Krunoslav Tepeš ◽  
Tadej Brezina

Studying cycling traffic issues in a beginner city – City of Zagreb, stems from unclear development policy, an increase in cycling volume, a large number of traffic accidents, an inadequate infrastructure and legislation, a small number of high quality studies and published papers, and the question, did current cycling policy and programs advance cycling? A comprehensive search of available literature, including data from the Zagreb Traffic Department, was made. These data do not adequately address the direction of causality, such as whether current cycling policy and programs advance cycling or whether cycling demand led to increased levels of cycling. This review paper suggests that, it is not yet possible to evaluate which pro-bicycle packages are the most effective and, development of cycling traffic requires a coordinated holistic planning strategy. Results could serve as a beacon light for similarly sized beginner cities, especially those who are located in South-eastern and Eastern Europe.


2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geraldine Swift

Almost all psychiatric training programmes include a journal club. These clubs are experiencing a revival as a result of the introduction of a critical review paper into Part II of the MRCPsych examinations. Successful clubs are generally those with a single designated leader and mandatory attendance; provision of food is also helpful. A number of possible formats are discussed, designed to make the club an entertaining and stimulating experience.


2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Heikenfeld ◽  
Paul Drzaic ◽  
Jong-Souk Yeo ◽  
Tim Koch

2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 390-393
Author(s):  
Asim Naeem ◽  
Joan Rutherford ◽  
Chris Kenn

“Examinations are formidable even to the best prepared, for the greatest fool may ask more than the wisest man can answer!” (Charles Kaleb Cotton)The MRCPsych Part II examination remains an important milestone (or barrier) for those wishing to pursue higher specialist training in psychiatry. There have been significant changes to the structure of this complex exam, with modification of the multiple choice question (MCQ) and essay papers and the introduction of the critical review paper. With pass rates varying from 39–49% over recent years, it clearly represents a significant hurdle for psychiatric trainees. This article aims to provide specific advice on how best to approach and tackle each of the components of the exam.


1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 628-628
Author(s):  
Stephen P. Tyrer

The procedure for nomination to the MRCPsych Board of Examiners was recently published in Psychiatric Bulletin (Tyrer, 1999). These have led to enquiry by Members and Fellows of the College about the criteria for appointment to other Committees and Panels that are under the aegis of the Examinations Department. Following discussion at the Examinations Sub-Committee the criteria for appointment of psychiatrists to the Panel of Observers, the Panels concerned with the development of questions for the Multiple Choice Papers in both Parts of the MRCPsych Examinations, the Critical Review Paper and the Essay Paper in Part II of the Examination and for Overseas Examiners, are indicated below.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document