Survival advantage of screen-detected cancer over stage-matched symptomatic cancer

2013 ◽  
pp. 78-86
Author(s):  
Gordon Wishart
2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 132-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean P. Hedican ◽  
Eric R. Wilkinson ◽  
Thomas F. Warner ◽  
Fred T. Lee ◽  
Stephen Y. Nakada

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie A. Kazanas ◽  
Jeanette Altarriba
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 101969
Author(s):  
Sarah Price ◽  
Gary A. Abel ◽  
Willie Hamilton

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 100143
Author(s):  
Michelle C. Salazar ◽  
Maureen E. Canavan ◽  
Samantha L. Walters ◽  
Sitaram Chilakamarry ◽  
Theresa Ermer ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 1474-1477 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.S Sinha ◽  
S Thrush ◽  
S Bendall ◽  
T Bates

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 20160936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate D. L. Umbers ◽  
Sebastiano De Bona ◽  
Thomas E. White ◽  
Jussi Lehtonen ◽  
Johanna Mappes ◽  
...  

Deimatic or ‘startle’ displays cause a receiver to recoil reflexively in response to a sudden change in sensory input. Deimatism is sometimes implicitly treated as a form of aposematism (unprofitability associated with a signal). However, the fundamental difference is, in order to provide protection, deimatism does not require a predator to have any learned or innate aversion. Instead, deimatism can confer a survival advantage by exploiting existing neural mechanisms in a way that releases a reflexive response in the predator. We discuss the differences among deimatism, aposematism, and forms of mimicry, and their ecological and evolutionary implications. We highlight outstanding questions critical to progress in understanding deimatism.


1994 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Mary Heal ◽  
Naomi Kenmotsu ◽  
Jacob M. Rowe ◽  
Neil Blumberg

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document