Cisapride Versus Placebo for 8 Weeks on Glycemic Control and Gastric Emptying in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes: A Double Blind Cross-Over Trial1

1999 ◽  
Vol 84 (7) ◽  
pp. 2357-2362
Author(s):  
Georg Stacher ◽  
Guntram Schernthaner ◽  
Mario Francesconi ◽  
Hans-Peter Kopp ◽  
Helmar Bergmann ◽  
...  

In insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, slow gastric emptying may make absorption unpredictable and foster glycemic instability. Cisapride accelerates emptying, but controlled long term studies are scarce, and effects on glycemic control unknown. We investigated, in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and unstable glycemia, the effects of 10 mg cisapride 4 times daily for 8 weeks vs. placebo on glycemic control and gastric emptying under random, cross-over, double blind conditions. In 14 patients with delayed and 9 with nondelayed emptying, blood glucose variability over 2 8-week treatment periods separated by a 4-week wash-out and gastric emptying of a semisolid 1168-kJ meal immediately after the treatment periods were assessed. Cisapride did not affect glycemic control [sd of within-patient mean blood glucose, 4.2 mmol/L ± 0.1 (±sem) vs. 4.0 ± 0.1 mmol/L after placebo; hemoglobin A1c, 8.3 ± 0.2% vs. 8.5 ± 0.2%]. Emptying was faster after cisapride than after placebo in 8 of 14 patients with delayed vs. 7 of 9 with nondelayed emptying (P = NS) and in 11 of 15 without vs. 4 of 8 with cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (P = NS). Autonomic neuropathy prevailed in 7 of 14 patients with delayed and 1 of 9 with nondelayed emptying. Blood glucose immediately before and during assessment of emptying was unrelated to the emptying rate, whereas blood glucose increases over fasting levels were greater with faster emptying (P< 0.002). In conclusion, cisapride’s effects were not different from those of placebo on glycemic control and gastric emptying, it did not differently affect patients with delayed vs. nondelayed emptying, and it slightly accelerated emptying (P = NS) in patients without, but not in those with, cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy. Blood glucose levels before and during assessment of emptying did not affect emptying, but the glucose rise over fasting levels was greater with faster emptying.

1982 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 410-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leif Groop ◽  
Karl Johan Tötterman

Abstract. In a double-blind cross-over trial we compared the effects of placebo and propranolol on iv tolbutamide and oral glipizide-stimulated insulin secretion in 10 noninsulin dependent diabetics. The patients were randomly allocated for 2 weeks treatment with placebo and propranolol 80 mg twice daily. At the end of each period an iv tolbutamide test and an oral glipizide-glucose-test were performed. Tolbutamide-stimulated insulin secretion was not affected by propranolol. There was no change in blood glucose levels during the iv tolbutamide test (IVTT), which excluded an effect of blood glucose on insulin secretion. During the oral glipizide-glucose challenge propranolol decreased blood glucose at 60 min (P < 0.01) and increased C-peptide at 0 min (P < 0.01) and 30 min (P < 0.05) compared with placebo. In contrast to earlier results obtained in animals and healthy subjects propranolol does not inhibit insulin- or C-peptide responses to sulphonylurea in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.


1991 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 13-16

People with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus should modify their diet, avoid obesity and take regular exercise. An oral hypoglycaemic drug may be needed if these measures fail to control blood glucose, but it is now clear that they commonly cause hypoglycaemia. More than 3 million prescriptions were issued in 1988 for the sulphonylureas (eight currently available) and the biguanide, metformin. Glibenclamide is the market leader (1.4 million prescriptions in 1988), followed by metformin (950,000), chlorpropamide (280,000), tolbutamide (260,000) and gliclazide (200,000). Instituting a district policy to restrict the choice of sulphonylureas can improve care and save money.1 No new oral hypoglycaemics have been marketed since we last reviewed them2 but their place in overall management has been clarified.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document