scholarly journals Nine-year prospective efficacy and safety of brain-responsive neurostimulation for focal epilepsy

Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 95 (9) ◽  
pp. e1244-e1256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dileep R. Nair ◽  
Kenneth D. Laxer ◽  
Peter B. Weber ◽  
Anthony M. Murro ◽  
Yong D. Park ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo prospectively evaluate safety and efficacy of brain-responsive neurostimulation in adults with medically intractable focal onset seizures (FOS) over 9 years.MethodsAdults treated with brain-responsive neurostimulation in 2-year feasibility or randomized controlled trials were enrolled in a long-term prospective open label trial (LTT) to assess safety, efficacy, and quality of life (QOL) over an additional 7 years. Safety was assessed as adverse events (AEs), efficacy as median percent change in seizure frequency and responder rate, and QOL with the Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-89) inventory.ResultsOf 256 patients treated in the initial trials, 230 participated in the LTT. At 9 years, the median percent reduction in seizure frequency was 75% (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon signed rank), responder rate was 73%, and 35% had a ≥90% reduction in seizure frequency. We found that 18.4% (47 of 256) experienced ≥1 year of seizure freedom, with 62% (29 of 47) seizure-free at the last follow-up and an average seizure-free period of 3.2 years (range 1.04–9.6 years). Overall QOL and epilepsy-targeted and cognitive domains of QOLIE-89 remained significantly improved (p < 0.05). There were no serious AEs related to stimulation, and the sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP) rate was significantly lower than predefined comparators (p < 0.05, 1-tailed χ2).ConclusionsAdjunctive brain-responsive neurostimulation provides significant and sustained reductions in the frequency of FOS with improved QOL. Stimulation was well tolerated; implantation-related AEs were typical of other neurostimulation devices; and SUDEP rates were low.ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT00572195.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class IV evidence that brain-responsive neurostimulation significantly reduces focal seizures with acceptable safety over 9 years.

2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (S 01) ◽  
pp. S007-S012 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Ranjana ◽  
S. Dwajani ◽  
Chanda Kulkarni ◽  
G. R. K Sarma

ABSTRACT Context: Quality of life (QOL) assessment in patients with epilepsy (PWE) is increasingly recognized as an important component in the management of epilepsy. Aims: The objective of the present study was to assess influence of sociodemographic, clinical and pharmacotherapy characteristics collectively on QOL in adult PWE. Settings and Design: This was a cross-sectional, observational study in patients with confirmed diagnosis of epilepsy. Materials and Methods: QOL was assessed using modified QOLIE-10 questionnaire for epilepsy. Univariate and multiple regression analysis were done to determine factors associated with poor QOL, respectively. Results: There were 451 PWE, with a mean age 27.3 ± 8.15 years, 251 (56%) males and 191 (42%) had monthly income < 5000 Indian national rupees (INR)/month. The QOLIE score was 64.1 ± 15.97 (Mean ± SD). The univariate analysis showed factors such as lower monthly income, focal epilepsy, seizure frequency, antiepileptic drug (AED) polytherapy, conventional AEDs and frequent adverse drug reactions (ADRs) had significant negative influence on various domains of QOLIE-10 questionnaire. Multiple regression analysis showed seizure frequency as a significant predictor of most QOL domains and overall score, while ADRs as a significant predictor of all the domains. Seizure type was a predictive factor for domains like emotional well-being and overall score. Conclusion: Present findings showed patients on monotherapy had better QOL while those having lower monthly income, having focal epilepsy and who received conventional AEDs had negative influence on QOL scores. Further, higher seizure frequency and occurrence of ADRs were significant predictors of all the domains of QOL in PWE.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3197-3197
Author(s):  
Viridiana Cano ◽  
José Bartelt-Hofer ◽  
Wenruo Hu ◽  
Shauna R. Andersson ◽  
Pronabesh Dasmahapatra ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Fitusiran is an investigational, subcutaneous (SC), prophylactically administered small interfering RNA (siRNA) therapeutic. It targets antithrombin and restores thrombin generation sufficient to rebalance hemostasis in people with hemophilia A or B, with or without inhibitors. Long-term exposure to fitusiran is being studied in a Phase 1/2, 6-year open-label extension study (NCT02554773) in patients with hemophilia (PwH) A or B with or without inhibitors. Improvement in the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as measured by Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) total score, and specifically in the physical health domain was previously reported by von Mackensen et al. for PwHA with inhibitors (NCT02554773, N=17, von Mackensen et al. Blood 2020;136(1):23-24). This analysis aimed to present HRQoL changes from baseline to last available measure (LAM), as measured by the Haem-A-QoL total score and domains (filtered by actual treatment exposure following 2 voluntary dosing holds) in PwHA, with or without inhibitors, who continued into the Phase 2 open-label extension study. METHODS Participants who completed the Phase 1 study (NCT02035605) were eligible to participate in Phase 2 long-term exposure study (NCT02554773). All participants received fixed monthly doses of 50 mg (N=9) or 80 mg (N=18) of fitusiran. HRQoL data were collected in 3-month lapse periods. Mean changes from baseline to LAM were calculated for the Haem-A-QoL (total score and domains). RESULTS As of February 2021, 26 severe and 1 moderate PwHA (13 with, 14 without inhibitors) with mean baseline age (SD) 37.3 (9.7) were treated for up to mean (SD) 33.32 (17.06) months. For the total Haem-A-QoL score and each of 10 domains, mean improvements from baseline to LAM (lower scores denoting better HRQoL) were consistently observed in PwHA (except for the sport & leisure domain that was higher in the non-inhibitor group). Mean estimated reductions (SD) in the Haem-A-QoL total score were -8.33 (13.84) and -9.16 (14.55) while that in the physical health domain score were -13.21 (25.07) and -7.14 (22.80), for PwHA with and without inhibitors respectively (Table 1). When comparing Haem-A-QoL domains in inhibitor to non-inhibitor participants, results suggest a modest favorable trend for non-inhibitor patients (greater reductions in 4 vs 6 domains, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Mean improvements in the Haem-A-QoL total scores and 9 out of 10 domains suggest sustained HRQoL improvements in PwHA. Small sample size and outlying results might limit the interpretation. Further research in HRQoL for fitusiran will include a larger population on the new 50 mg every other month dose regimen, and notably Phase III results from NCT03549871 (open-label study in patients switching to fitusiran from previous prophylaxis or bypassing agents) and NCT03754790 (open-label, long-term safety and efficacy study of fitusiran) in various subpopulations. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Cano: Sanofi Genzyme: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Takeda: Ended employment in the past 24 months. Bartelt-Hofer: Sanofi: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Hu: Sanofi: Current Employment. Andersson: Sanofi: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; WEST advisory committee member: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dasmahapatra: Sanofi: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Von Mackensen: Biomarin: Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Sobi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf: Current Employment; CSL Behring: Speakers Bureau; Chugai/Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Neurology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 89 (12) ◽  
pp. 1237-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Messoud Ashina ◽  
David Dodick ◽  
Peter J. Goadsby ◽  
Uwe Reuter ◽  
Stephen Silberstein ◽  
...  

Objective:To assess long-term safety and efficacy of anti–calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor erenumab in patients with episodic migraine (EM).Methods:Patients enrolled in a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (NCT01952574) who continued in an open-label extension (OLE) study will receive erenumab 70 mg every 4 weeks for up to 5 years. This preplanned interim analysis, conducted after all participants had completed the 1-year open-label follow-up, evaluated changes in monthly migraine days (MMD), achievement of ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reductions, Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) score, Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQ), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), and safety. Data reported as observed without imputation for missing data.Results:Of 472 patients enrolled in the parent study, 383 continued in the OLE with a median exposure to erenumab of 575 days (range 28–822 days). Mean (SD) MMD were 8.8 (2.6) at parent study baseline, 6.3 (4.2) at week 12 (beginning of OLE), and 3.7 (4.0) at week 64 (mean change from baseline [reduction] of 5.0 days). At week 64, 65%, 42%, and 26% achieved ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reduction in MMD, respectively. Mean HIT-6 scores were 60.2 (6.3) at baseline and 51.7 (9.2) at week 64. MSQ and MIDAS improvements from baseline were maintained through week 64. Safety profiles during the OLE were similar to those in the double-blind phase, which overall were similar to placebo.Conclusions:One-year efficacy, supported by functional improvements and favorable safety and tolerability profiles, supports further investigation of erenumab as a preventive treatment in patients with EM.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier:NCT01952574.Classification of evidence:This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with episodic migraine, erenumab reduces long-term MMD and improves headache-related disability and migraine-specific quality of life.


Author(s):  
S. M. Belentsov

Introduction. Chronic venous disease significantly reduces quality of life and often leads to complications. The only way to eliminate hemodynamically significant blood flow disorders is the surgical method, incl. its latest modification is the VenaSeal.Objective of the study. To study the immediate and long-term results of the use of VenaSeal adhesive technology to obliterate the incompetent major saphenous veins, as well as the potential benefits in special groups of patients based on three-year experience in using VenaSeal Glue Procedure.Materials and methods. Over a 3-year period, we have treated 104 patients with VenaSeal. The average age was 59.6 ± 14.97 years, the CEAP class was 3.2 ± 1.09. 101 patients had varicose veins, in three cases - post-thrombotic. The intervention was performed on 117 incompetent main veins: GSV – 107, SSV – 10.Results and discussion. Clinical evaluation and ultrasound imaging of veins immediately after the intervention of vein occlusion throughout the intervention. There was no pronounced pain syndrome after surgery. Complications occurred in 3 patients in the form of chemical phlebitis. Long-term results up to 3 years were studied clinically and using ultrasound in 72 patients (76 veins): recanalization was noted in 2 GSV (2.6%), which in one case was accompanied by the formation of a recurrent varicose veins. To study the effect of VenaSeal on the quality of life in a comparative aspect, a non-randomized, single-center, open-label study was carried out; it included patients, incl. with GSV occlusion using RFA and EVLT. In the group of patients after VenaSeal, the quality of life indicators were better values. In addition, the absence of the need for elastic compression made the surgical treatment of patients with chronic venous disease and concomitant lesions of the peripheral arterial bed. In groups of elderly and senile patients, patients with weeping eczema, with obesity, additional advantages were found in the form of a decrease in the invasiveness of the intervention and the possibility of correcting reflux as a hemodynamic basis for the development of trophic disorders with the aim of their faster and more effective relief.Conclusions. Non-thermal obliteration of incompetent major saphenous veins using VenaSeal in varicose veins and post-thrombotic disease is highly effective: the immediate results assessed with clinical methods and using ultrasound duplex scanning confirmed the occlusion of the target vein in all cases. The study of long-term results revealed recanalization of two veins out of 76, which accounted for 2.6%.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document