scholarly journals Is Cauda Equina Syndrome Being Treated Within the Recommended Time Frame

Neurosurgery ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 1324-1325
Author(s):  
&NA;
Neurosurgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 1520-1526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert T. Arrigo ◽  
Paul Kalanithi ◽  
Maxwell Boakye

Abstract BACKGROUND: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare but devastating medical condition requiring urgent surgery to halt or reverse neurological compromise. Controversy exists as to how soon surgery must be performed after diagnosis, and clinical and medicolegal factors make this question highly relevant to the spine surgeon. It is unclear from the literature how often CES patients are treated within the recommended time frame. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether CES patients are being treated in compliance with the current guideline of surgery within 48 hours and to assess incidence, demography, comorbidities, and outcome measures of CES patients. METHODS: We searched the 2003 to 2006 California State Inpatient Databases to identify degenerative lumbar disk disorder patients surgically treated for CES. An International Classification of Disease, ninth revision, clinical modification, diagnosis code was used to identify CES patients with advanced disease. RESULTS: The majority (88.74%) of California's CES patients received surgery within the recommended 48-hour window after diagnosis. The incidence of CES in surgically treated degenerative lumbar disk patients was 1.51% with an average of 397 cases per year in California. CES patients had worse outcomes and used more healthcare resources than other surgically treated degenerative lumbar disk patients; this disparity was more pronounced for patients with advanced CES. CES patients treated after 48 hours had 3 times the odds of a nonroutine discharge as patients treated within 48 hours (odds ratio = 3.082; P < .001). CONCLUSION: In California, patients are being treated within the recommended 48-hour time frame.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel L. Leech ◽  
James Selfe ◽  
Suzanne Ball ◽  
Susan Greenhalgh ◽  
Gareth Hogan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
G.R. González Toledo ◽  
H. Pérez Pérez ◽  
L. Brage Martín ◽  
V. Castro López-Tarruella

2021 ◽  
Vol 163 (4) ◽  
pp. 1191-1198
Author(s):  
Andreas K. Demetriades ◽  
Marco Mancuso-Marcello ◽  
Asfand Baig Mirza ◽  
Joseph Frantzias ◽  
David A. Bell ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Isolated acute bilateral foot drop due to degenerative spine disease is an extremely rare neurosurgical presentation, whilst the literature is rich with accounts of chronic bilateral foot drop occurring as a sequela of systemic illnesses. We present, to our knowledge, the largest case series of acute bilateral foot drop, with trauma and relevant systemic illness excluded. Methods Data from three different centres had been collected at the time of historic treatment, and records were subsequently reviewed retrospectively, documenting the clinical presentation, radiological level of compression, timing of surgery, and degree of neurological recovery. Results Seven patients are presented. The mean age at presentation was 52.1 years (range 41–66). All patients but one were male. All had a painful radiculopathic presentation. Relevant discopathy was observed from L2/3 to L5/S1, the commonest level being L3/4. Five were treated within 24 h of presentation, and two within 48 h. Three had concomitant cauda equina syndrome; of these, the first two made a full motor recovery, one by 6 weeks follow-up and the second on the same-day post-op evaluation. Overall, five out of seven cases had full resolution of their ankle dorsiflexion pareses. One patient with 1/5 power has not improved. Another with 1/5 weakness improved to normal on the one side and to 3/5 on the other. Conclusion When bilateral foot drop occurs acutely, we encourage the consideration of degenerative spinal disease. Relevant discopathy was observed from L2/3 to L5/S1; aberrant innervation may be at play. Cauda equina syndrome is not necessarily associated with acute bilateral foot drop. The prognosis seems to be pretty good with respect to recovery of the foot drop, especially if partial at presentation and if treated within 48 h.


Author(s):  
Nithish Jayakumar ◽  
Lucie Ferguson ◽  
Justin Nissen ◽  
Damian Holliman

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Richardson ◽  
F Greenway ◽  
A Mostofi ◽  
E Pereira

Abstract Introduction Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a spinal emergency that cannot be reliably detected through clinical examination alone and as a result requires prompt MR imaging to provide a diagnosis. This audit examined compliance to standard of care following service improvements in line with the updated SBNS/BASS national guidelines for CES. Method A retrospective analysis of 200 patients referred to neurosurgery for suspected CES: 100 pre- and 100 post-service improvement SBNS guideline implementation. The online neurosurgical database was reviewed, cases assessed for completeness of referral information (including appropriate exam and pre-referral MRI) with patient demographics, referring hospital and outcome also recorded. Results Prior to the SBNS guidelines only 19 patients received MRI prior to referral, 70% of all referrals were incomplete or contained erroneous clinical information. Post-service improvements there was a 68% increase of pre-referral MRI (32 cases), and an improvement in quality of clinical information with only 19% of referrals providing insufficient or unreliable information. Conclusions Through relatively simple changes to local policy, patient care flow and education of emergency department clinicians we have significantly improved pre-referral MRI rates as well as overall referral quality across the whole DGH network.


2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 594.e5-594.e8 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.D. Bartleson ◽  
Gary M. Miller ◽  
Giuseppe Lanzino

1999 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Robe ◽  
Didier Martin ◽  
Jacques Lenelle ◽  
Achille Stevenaert

✓ The posterior epidural migration of sequestered lumbar disc fragments is an uncommon event. The authors report two such cases in which patients presented with either intense radicular pain or cauda equina syndrome. The radiological characteristics were the posterior epidural location and the ring enhancement of the mass after injection of contrast material. The major diagnostic pitfalls are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document