scholarly journals Open Versus Minimally Invasive Resection of Gastric GIST: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes: A Reply

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (S3) ◽  
pp. 626-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle A. Bischof ◽  
Timothy M. Pawlik
2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2941-2948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle A. Bischof ◽  
Yuhree Kim ◽  
Rebecca Dodson ◽  
M. Carolina Jimenez ◽  
Ramy Behman ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
BrianK. P. Goh ◽  
Madeline Chee ◽  
Chuan-Yaw Lee ◽  
Ser-Yee Lee ◽  
LondonL. P. J. Ooi ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S1296
Author(s):  
Gyulnara G. Kasumova ◽  
Omidreza Tabatabaie ◽  
Ayotunde B. Fadayomi ◽  
Promise O. Ukandu ◽  
Sing Chau Ng ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeon-Ju Huh ◽  
Joo-Ho Lee

Laparoscopic gastrectomy is evolving. With the increasing expertise and experience of oncologic surgeons in the minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer, the indication for laparoscopic gastrectomy is expanding to advanced cases. Many studies have demonstrated the benefits of minimally invasive surgery, including reduced risk of surgery-related injury, reduced blood loss, less pain, and earlier recovery. In order to establish concrete evidence for the suitability of minimal invasive surgery for gastric cancer, many multicenter RCTs, comparing the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery, are in progress. Advances in laparoscopic gastrectomy are moving toward increasingly minimally invasive approaches that enable the improvement of the quality of life of patients, without compromising on oncologic safety.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document