scholarly journals Walking Biomechanics Six and Twelve Months Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Compared to Healthy Controls

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hope C. Davis ◽  
Steven J. Pfeiffer ◽  
Christopher D. Johnston ◽  
Matthew K. Seeley ◽  
Matthew S. Harkey ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Yuxue Xie ◽  
Yibo Dan ◽  
Hongyue Tao ◽  
Chenglong Wang ◽  
Chengxiu Zhang ◽  
...  

Objectives. To introduce a new implementation of radiomics analysis for cartilage and subchondral bone of the knee and to compare the performance of the proposed models to classic T2 relaxation time in distinguishing knees predisposed to posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and healthy controls. Methods. 114 patients following ACLR after at least 2 years and 43 healthy controls were reviewed and allocated to training ( n = 110 ) and testing ( n = 47 ) cohorts. Radiomics models are built for cartilage and subchondral bone regions of different compartments: lateral femur (LF), lateral tibia (LT), medial femur (MF), and medial tibia (MT) and combined models of four compartments on T2 mapping images. The model performance of discrimination between patients and controls was illustrated with the receiver operating characteristic curve and compared with a classic T2 value-based model. Results. The T2 value model of cartilage yielded moderate predictive performance in discerning patients and controls, with an AUC of 0.731 (95% confidence interval, 0.556–0.875) in the testing cohort, while the radiomics signature of cartilage and subchondral bone of different compartments demonstrated excellent performance, with AUCs of 0.864–0.979. Furthermore, the combined model reported an even better performance, with AUCs of 0.977 (95% confidence interval, 0.919–1.000) for the cartilage and 0.934 (95% confidence interval, 0.865–0.994) for the subchondral bone in the testing cohort. Conclusion. The radiomics features of the cartilage and subchondral bone may be able to provide powerful tools with more sensitive detection than T2 values in differentiating knees at risk for PTOA after ACLR from healthy knees.


2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 435-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Robert Bell ◽  
Mason D. Smith ◽  
Anthony P. Pennuto ◽  
Mikel R. Stiffler ◽  
Matthew E. Olson

Context: The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) is a clinical evaluation of jump-landing mechanics and may provide useful information in assisting with return-to-sport decisions in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, it is currently unknown how patients with ACLR perform on the LESS compared with healthy controls. Objective: To determine if the total LESS score differed between individuals with ACLR and healthy controls and to determine the types of errors that differ between groups. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 27 individuals with unilateral ACLR (age = 19.8 ± 1.8 years, height = 170 ± 5.5 cm, mass = 68.8 ± 11.9 kg) and 27 controls (age = 20.5 ± 1.7 years, height = 169 ± 8.4 cm, mass = 66.6 ± 9.0 kg) with no history of ACLR. Intervention(s): Each participant completed 3 trials of a standardized jump-landing task. Main Outcome Measure(s): Each jump landing was assessed for specific postures using standardized LESS criteria by a blinded evaluator. Individual LESS items were summed to create a total LESS score. The dominant limb was assessed in the control group, and the reconstructed limb was assessed in the ACLR group. Results: The ACLR group had higher LESS scores compared with controls (ACLR: 6.7 ± 2.1 errors, control: 5.6 ± 1.5 errors, P = .04). Additionally, the ACLR group was more likely to err when landing with lateral trunk flexion (Fisher exact test, P = .002). Conclusions: Individuals with ACLR had worse landing mechanics as measured by the LESS. Lateral trunk deviation may be related to quadriceps avoidance in the reconstructed limb or poor trunk neuromuscular control. The LESS is useful for evaluating landing errors in patients with ACLR and may help to identify areas of focus during rehabilitation and before return to sport.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document