scholarly journals A Theory of the Consumption Function, With and Without Liquidity Constraints

2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 23-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher D Carroll

This paper argues that the modern stochastic consumption model, in which impatient consumers face uninsurable labor income risk, matches Milton Friedman's (1957) original description of the Permanent Income Hypothesis much better than the perfect foresight or certainty equivalent models did. The model can explain the high marginal propensity to consume, the high discount rate on future income, and the important role for precautionary behavior that were all part of Friedman's original framework. The paper also explains the relationship of these questions to the Euler equation literature, and argues that the effects of precautionary saving and liquidity constraints are often virtually indistinguishable.

Author(s):  
Tullio Jappelli ◽  
Luigi Pistaferri

The chapter removes the assumption of quadratic utility and examines situations in which consumers respond to income risk by increasing current saving to protect against future shocks to income. This motive for saving is called precautionary saving, and it provides an explanation for some of the empirical findings in the literature, such as the observation that people with more volatile incomes tend to save more than individuals with more stable income patterns. Moreover, it can also explain the excess sensitivity of consumption to expected income changes. Indeed, a model with precautionary saving produces a good many predictions similar to those of the model with liquidity constraints.


2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 107-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tullio Jappelli ◽  
Luigi Pistaferri

We use responses to survey questions in the 2010 Italian Survey of Household Income and Wealth that ask consumers how much of an unexpected transitory income change they would consume. The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 48 percent on average. We also find substantial heterogeneity in the distribution, as households with low cash-on-hand exhibit a much higher MPC than affluent households, which is in agreement with models with precautionary savings, where income risk plays an important role. The results have important implications for predicting household responses to tax reforms and redistributive policies. (JEL D12, D14, E21, E62, H23, H24)


Author(s):  
Rio Cahya Perdana ◽  
Tirsa Neyatri Bandrang

Pola konsumsi karyawan memiliki perbedaan pada tingkat jabatan dan pendapatan sehingga berpengaruh terhadan tingkat konsumsinya serta pola konsumsi dan pengeluaran konsumsi suatu rumah tangga pada karyawan serta berbeda pula persentase penggunaan pendapatan yang digunakan untuk konsumsi. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pola konsumsi karyawan PT Salonok Ladang Mas, sehingga dapat dilihat perbedaan pola konsumsi pangan antara karyawan pimpinan dengan karyawan pelaksana, selanjutnya dapat diketahui besarnya perubahan konsumsi pangan akibat perubahan pendapatan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah secara purposive dengan alasan keragaman pendapatan yang sangat bervariasi. Pengambilan sampel karyawan sebanyak 14 sampel untuk karyawan pimpinan dan 90 sampel untuk karyawan pelaksana. Dengan metode simple random sampling. Jumlah sampel ditentukan dengan Metode Slovin. Metode di analisis dengan metode analisis deskriptif, menghitung persen rata-rata pengeluaran konsumsi pangan, Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC), dan Elastisitas pendapatan. Hasil penelitian diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan mengenai pola konsumsi hanya yang membedakan adalah jumlah bahan pangan yang dikonsumsi dan besarnya pengeluaran konsumsi. Pengeluaran konsumsi pangan karyawan pelaksana lebih tinggi di bandingkan karyawan pimpinan, ini menunjukkan tingkat kesejahteraan karyawan pimpinan lebih tinggi dibandingkan karyawan pelaksana. tingkat pendapatan terhadap jumlah pengeluaran konsumsi pangan adalah “ inelastis”.


2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Rehm

Why has the American political landscape grown more partisan since the 1970s? This article provides a novel account of the determinants of partisanship. The author argues that partisanship is not only shaped by the traditionally suggested socio-economic factors, but also by the uncertainty of future income (risk exposure): rich individuals facing a high degree of risk exposure (or poor people facing low risk exposure) are ‘cross-pressured’; while their income suggests that they should identify with the Republicans, their income prospects make them sympathize with the Democrats. These two traits have overlapped increasingly since the 1970s. Those with lower incomes tend to be also those with higher risk exposure (risk inequality increased). This has led to a sorting of the American electorate: more citizens have become ‘natural’ partisans.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Fugazza ◽  
Maela Giofré ◽  
Giovanna Nicodano

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (034) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth Pruitt ◽  
◽  
Nicholas Turner ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document