scholarly journals Organizing Time Exchanges: Lessons from Matching Markets

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 338-373
Author(s):  
Tommy Andersson ◽  
Ágnes Cseh ◽  
Lars Ehlers ◽  
Albin Erlanson

This paper considers time exchanges via a common platform (e.g., markets for exchanging time units, positions at education institutions, and tuition waivers). There are several problems associated with such markets, e.g., imbalanced outcomes, coordination problems, and inefficiencies. We model time exchanges as matching markets and construct a non-manipulable mechanism that selects an individually rational and balanced allocation that maximizes exchanges among the participating agents (and those allocations are efficient). This mechanism works on a preference domain whereby agents classify the goods provided by other participating agents as either unacceptable or acceptable, and for goods classified as acceptable, agents have specific upper quotas representing their maximum needs. (JEL C78, D47, D82)

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin P. Bruner

AbstractI argue that the set of moralized norms and beliefs is more expansive than Stanford appears to suggest. In particular, I contend that norms governing behavior in conflictual coordination problems are likely to be moralized.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Waggoner ◽  
Eric Glen Weyl
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 383-390
Author(s):  
Lina Eriksson

Abstract Hindriks describes institutions as norm-governed social practices, and argue that his theory help bring together and complete earlier theories of institutions. In this comment on his paper, I argue that his argument would be even better if he clarified certain parts of his argument with regards to the nature of institutions and the relationship between institutions and social norms. I also argue that he should reconsider his claim that institutions (and social norms) exist in order to solve cooperation and coordination problems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document