A century of citation classics in otolaryngology—head and neck surgery journals

2002 ◽  
Vol 116 (7) ◽  
pp. 494-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Fenton ◽  
D. Roy ◽  
J. P. Hughes ◽  
A. S. Jones

The Science Citation Index (SCI) was introduced primarily as a method of information retrieval but has also been used an objective measure of the quality of an article. Citation classics have been described as papers that have been cited 100 times or more. The aim of this study was to identify the articles published during the 20th century in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery journals that have achieved classic citation status and to present an analysis of this data. Using a database provided by the Institute of Scientific Information (Philadelphia, PA), an assessment was performed of all articles cited 100 or more times in one of the 28 clinical otolaryngology-head and neck journals indexed by the annual Journal Citation Reports. The data were based on citation counts using the 1900 through 1999 Science Citation Index. Institutions located in 10 different countries produced 80 noteworthy articles. The most-cited paper achieved a citation score of 406 and there were 11 articles cited on more than 200 occasions. All of the articles were published in eight journals. The earliest identified publication was in 1933 and the most recent was published in 1993. Twenty authors were involved in two articles and four authors were associated with three classic citations. This paper confirms that analysing citation classics reveals a partial insight into advances and historical developments in the specialty during the last century.

2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (6) ◽  
pp. 1358-1362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel H. Coelho ◽  
Luke W. Edelmayer ◽  
John E. Fenton

2005 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 262-263
Author(s):  
Michael S. Benninger ◽  
Robert K. Jackler ◽  
Jonas T. Johnson ◽  
Michael M. Johns ◽  
David W. Kennedy ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
José Florencio F. Lapeña

“Where are we headed, oh where have we gone? We’ve come a long way, now let us move on. Dreams are for dreaming, wake up and they run; Life is for living, come, let us move on1”   A quarter of a century ago, Dr. Angel Enriquez en-fleshed for us the opportunity to achieve “immortality in print” at a time when our society was celebrating its silver jubilee. Through the years, our journal has allowed us to disseminate ideas, chronicle discoveries, share knowledge and broadcast our dreams and aspirations beyond the confines of our circles. At the same time, our journal has served as a sounding board, monitoring the pulse of our society and the various contexts in which it lives and breathes and has being. The relationship has been and should rightfully be reciprocal: both journal and society react to and influence each other, while being influenced by and impacting the social, cultural, political, economic and environmental forces in the spatio-temporal contexts in which they exist. But existence means not merely “being” but “standing-forth.” While the various editors in chief have reflected their particular zeitgeists, they likewise stood out, leaving their imprints on the sands of time. For the first eight years, Angel E. Enriquez (1981-1988) nurtured & cared for his “baby” as editor, advertiser, distributor & newsboy all rolled into one. Though not surpassed, these efforts were at least equaled by Eusebio E. Llamas (1989-1990), who was succeeded by Alfredo QY Pontejos Jr (1990). Another eight year streak saw untiring efforts to improve the journal and, through it, our society by Joselito C. Jamir (1991- 98), paving the way for Jose M. Acuin (1999-2000) to professionalize the journal, aiming for indexing by Medline and Index Medicus by heroically publishing quarterly issues. The past five years saw Charlotte M. Chiong (2001-2005) at the helm, almost single-handedly performing the herculean task of bringing the journal to where it is today. If there is anything at all to be gleaned from a review of past editorials, it is a humbling, awe-inspiring realization of how each individually made their mark and of how tough an act to follow they collectively are. As we celebrate the silver anniversary of the Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery in the golden jubilee year of the Philippine Society of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, let us take the best from the past-- from Dr. Enriquez’ dreams to feature “Grand Rounds, Book Reviews, X-ray of the year” to Dr. Chiong’s aspirations to include a pathology case review section, review articles, proceedings of meetings, conventions and website publication in this “electronic era” of information technology, let us move on to the future with an internationally peer-reviewed publication that will be someday be indexed in Medline and Index Medicus2 and included in the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Master Journal list3. To this end, we reiterate our adherence to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals formulated by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors4. We are now available from http://www.psohns.org.ph/pjohns. Our new Editorial Board includes international scholars with impressive publishing records and citation indices. We have an equally august international group of peer reviewers who graciously agreed to help us gratis et amore. This issue features two international source articles. We are especially grateful to friends, alumni and colleagues overseas who choose to publish in our journal rather than in more prestigious, indexed titles. With your support, we trust that the scope and coverage, and quality of editorial work and content of our journal will continue growing in breadth and depth over the next five to eight years. We are thankful to Natividad Almazan-Aguilar, President of the PSOHNS and its Board of Trustees 2005 for entrusting us with the privilege of serving you through the Philipp J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. We trust that future leaders of our Society infuse the journal with the much-needed financial and management support necessary to ensure production quality (layout, printing, graphics, illustrations) and “that services and products of contractors, vendors, and other commercial interests required for proper publication are selected on the basis of merit5”. We invite you to consider your vital role in revitalizing our journal: surely it deserves much more than “second-choice” articles and PhP100.00 in annual journal fees? Through our journal, let us be “informed” of what has “transpired” so that being “inspired,” we can work to “transform” ourselves, our colleagues, our patients, our society and our world for the better.   Mabuhay tayong lahat!


REGIONOLOGY ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 831-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri M. Brumshteyn ◽  
Natalia K. Alimova

Introduction. The objective of the paper is to analyze scientific journals published in the post-Soviet states, as well as to identify the role of scientific journals in the information and analytical support for the adoption and implementation of decisions related to the management of scientific activities and socio- economic processes in countries and regions. Analysis of scientific journals based on a set of indicators will make it possible to identify the place of these publications in the national and international information space. Materials and Methods. The authors have analyzed available information about scientific journals published in the post-Soviet states and indexed by Scopus and Web of Science as well as information about such journals given on the website of the Higher Attestation Commission of Russia, data from the website of the Russian Science Citation Index and information from the official websites of the journals and from other sources. To obtain quantitative indicators related to the journals, standard means of search engines provided by the abovementioned resources were used. Data on the population of the countries and the number of researchers in them were taken from official statistics. Results. Data about the number of journals published in the post-Soviet states and indexed by Scopus, Web of Science and the Russian Science Citation Index, as well as those included in the list of the Higher Attestation Commission of Russia have been analyzed. Information on the publication activities of authors from the post-Soviet states has been evaluated as absolute and relative indicators. A number of common features of the editorial policies and practical activities of the considered journals have been identified as well as their approaches to the use of publication languages, to the issue of translated editions, to the formation of editorial boards and to the involvement of national and foreign authors. Discussion and Conclusion. Electronic repositories of scientific information play a crucial role in the formation of international and national scientific spaces. The materials presented in this article may be useful for coping with research tasks related to scientific periodicals as well as to support decision-making by heads of scientific units, editorial and publishing complexes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trevor Torgerson ◽  
Austin L. Johnson ◽  
Sam Jellison ◽  
Margo Tanghetti ◽  
Jean‐Maria Langley ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 115 (5) ◽  
pp. 761-762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Benninger ◽  
Robert K. Jackler ◽  
Jonas T. Johnson ◽  
Michael M. Johns ◽  
David W. Kennedy ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 303-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Benninger ◽  
Jeffrey P. Harris ◽  
Robert K. Jackler ◽  
Jonas T. Johnson ◽  
Michael M. Johns ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 132 (5) ◽  
pp. 675-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Benninger ◽  
Robert K. Jackler ◽  
Jonas T. Johnson ◽  
Michael M. Johns ◽  
David W. Kennedy ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Felipe Garcia

Aunque desde el inicio de la era moderna se ha reconocido el valor del conocimiento como fuente de riqueza y bienestar social, el efecto de este poder se está sintiendo con mayor fuerza en el mundo actual. En lo que va corrido del siglo XXI, la investigación científica está influenciando el desarrollo económico y social de los países. Sin embargo, el impacto en la generación de conocimientos está limitada a los recursos que se  destinen a esta actividad. En este sentido, la demanda de incremento en su financiación ha originado la necesidad de evaluar la actividad científica y sus resultados, siendo uno de los indicadores más directos las publicaciones científicas. Para examinar la productividad y el impacto de la investigación científica en el mundo, se han desarrollado diferentes indicadores bibliométricos o de indización, entre los cuales algunos son poco conocidos. Sin embargo históricamente, los más usados han sido el factor de impacto (1), el índice H (2); más recientemente la clasificación por cuartiles del Scimago SCOPUS y el SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) como indicadores de citación en la generación de conocimiento y su impacto global (3). Estos han permitido valorar la producción, difusión, consumo y repercusión de la información científica. Otros analizan la cantidad de publicaciones científicas elaboradas por grupos de autores o revistas, la cantidad de ellas incluidas en bases de datos como el Science Citation Index (SCI) y el Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) del Institute for Scientific Information –ISI-, la obsolescencia y aislamiento de las referencias bibliográficas o su clara alusión como la visibilidad, influencia o impacto.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document