scholarly journals Who evaluates public health programmes? A review of the NHS Breast Screening Programme

2010 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karsten Juhl Jørgensen ◽  
Peter C Gøtzsche
BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e028679
Author(s):  
Sian Zena Williamson ◽  
Rebecca Johnson ◽  
Harbinder Kaur Sandhu ◽  
Nicholas Parsons ◽  
Jacquie Jenkins ◽  
...  

IntroductionOne of the main harms from breast cancer screening is the anxiety caused by false positive results. Various factors may be associated with false-positive anxiety. One modifiable factor may be the method of communication used to deliver results. The aim of this study is to measure the effect on anxiety of receiving benign biopsy results in-person or by telephone.Methods and analysisThis is a multi-centre cluster randomised crossover trial in the English National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) involving repeated survey measures at four time points. Participants will be women of screening age who have a biopsy following a suspicious mammography result, who ultimately receive a benign or normal (B1) result. Centres will trial both telephone and in-person results on a month-by-month basis, being randomised to which communication method will be trialled first. Women will be blinded to the method of communication they will receive. The analysis will compare women who have received telephone results and women who have received in-person results. The primary outcome measure will be anxiety (measured by the Psychological Consequences Questionnaire) after receiving results, while controlling for baseline anxiety. Secondary outcome measures will include anxiety at 3 and 6 months post-results, understanding of results and patient preferences for how results are communicated. Qualitative telephone interviews will also be conducted to further explore women’s reasons for communication preferences. Qualitative and quantitative data will be integrated after initial separate analysis using the pillar integration process.Ethics and disseminationThis study has been approved by the Public Health England Breast Screening Programme Research Advisory Committee, (BSPRAC_0013, ODR1718_040) and the National Health Service Health Research Authority (HRA) West Midlands—Coventry & Warwickshire Research Ethics Committee (17/WM/0313). The findings from this study will be disseminated to key stakeholders within the NHSBSP and via academic publications.Trial registration numberISRCTN36997684Trial sponsorThis research is part of a PhD award and is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council Doctoral Training Centre at the University of Warwick and Public Health England. The sponsor for this research is Jane Prewett ([email protected]).


1983 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 529-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.W.H. Stamp ◽  
G.H. Whitehouse ◽  
I.W. McDicken ◽  
S.J. Leinster ◽  
W.D. George

2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 200-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
R L Bennett ◽  
R G Blanks ◽  
J Patnick ◽  
S M Moss

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document