Teleconsultation – collaborative work and opportunities for learning across organizational boundaries

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 377-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Line Lundvoll Nilsen ◽  
Anne Moen

Over a period of five months we observed teleconsultations between general practitioners (GPs) in community care and specialists in hospitals in two Norwegian health regions (A and B). In total, 47 teleconsultations between GPs and specialists were recorded. In region A, teleconsultations were organized when needed to discuss specific medical problems. In region B, teleconsultations took place during the specialists' daily morning meeting. The teleconsultations lasted for 5–40 min. There were three categories of talk. In the first two there was information exchange for patient updates and practical organization of the service. The third category, consultation, was the communicative process in which the GP and the specialist engaged in collaborative work, primarily discussing medical problems related to decision-making in patient care. Regular use of teleconsultation opens access to different repertoires of knowledge and experience, and brings knowledge to the point of patient care and medical decision-making.

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iris D. Hartog ◽  
Dick L. Willems ◽  
Wilbert B. van den Hout ◽  
Michael Scherer-Rath ◽  
Tom H. Oreel ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are frequently used for medical decision making, at the levels of both individual patient care and healthcare policy. Evidence increasingly shows that PROs may be influenced by patients’ response shifts (changes in interpretation) and dispositions (stable characteristics). Main text We identify how response shifts and dispositions may influence medical decisions on both the levels of individual patient care and health policy. We provide examples of these influences and analyse the consequences from the perspectives of ethical principles and theories of just distribution. Conclusion If influences of response shift and disposition on PROs and consequently medical decision making are not considered, patients may not receive optimal treatment and health insurance packages may include treatments that are not the most effective or cost-effective. We call on healthcare practitioners, researchers, policy makers, health insurers, and other stakeholders to critically reflect on why and how such patient reports are used.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriella Pravettoni ◽  
Claudio Lucchiari ◽  
Salvatore Nuccio Leotta ◽  
Gianluca Vago

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document