Sclerotherapy of varicose veins in patients with documented thrombophilia: a prospective controlled randomized study of 105 cases

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 176-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
C M Hamel-Desnos ◽  
J-L Gillet ◽  
P R Desnos ◽  
F A Allaert

Objectives The aim of this study was to assess thrombotic complications following sclerotherapy in thrombophilic patients in combination with thromboprophylaxis, in two randomized arms using low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or warfarin. Patients and methods This study received approval from the Ethics Committee. A total of 105 patients (81 females, 24 males) ranging in age from 20 to 82 years (mean 50) were selected: 75 with Factor V Leiden mutation, 18 with prothrombin 20210A mutation, 7 with high level of Factor VIII, 5 combinations of these. After randomization, 51 and 54 patients received warfarin and LMWH, respectively. A total of 199 sclerotherapy sessions were performed. Foam was used in 160 treatments. Results No episodes of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) occurred; no instances of DVT were revealed by ultrasound-monitoring. Conclusions This study suggests that in the three most common forms of thrombophilia, sclerotherapy, in combination with thromboprophylaxis, can be performed safely. Prophylaxis with LMWH is easier to use than warfarin.

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olcay Murat DİŞLİ ◽  
Barış AKÇA ◽  
Köksal DÖNMEZ ◽  
Cengiz ÇOLAK ◽  
Hasan Berat CİHAN ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 85 (02) ◽  
pp. 370-370
Author(s):  
Luca Masotti ◽  
Giacomo Zanelli ◽  
Stefania Battistini ◽  
Sandro Forconi ◽  
Roberto Cappelli

The Lancet ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 346 (8990) ◽  
pp. 1593-1596 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.W.M. Bloemenkamp ◽  
F.M. Helmerhorst ◽  
F.R. Rosendaal ◽  
J.P. Vandenbroucke ◽  
H.R. Büller

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (04) ◽  
pp. 510-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bert Manten ◽  
Rudi G J Westendorp ◽  
Ted Koster ◽  
Pieter H Reitsma ◽  
Frits R Rosendaal

Summary Background. Patients with venous thromboembolic disease may present with different clinical manifestations. Factor V Leiden mutation leading to resistance to activated protein C is associated with a sevenfold increased risk for presenting with deep-vein thrombosis. It is not yet established whether carriers of the mutation have a similarly increased risk for manifesting with pulmonary embolism. Methods. From an Anticoagulation Clinic monitoring coumarin therapy, a consecutive series of patients with a first thromboembolic event (objectively proven by current radiological methods) were enrolled. All patients were interviewed and blood was drawn for geno-typing. From the hospital charts and the personal interview, information was obtained on acquired risk factors and the signs and symptoms on hospital admission. Results. 45 patients presented with symptoms of pulmonary embolism only, 211 had only symptoms of deep-vein thrombosis whereas 23 had clinical features of both. In about half of the patients acquired risk factors for venous thromboembolism were present which did not differ between the three groups of patients. Recent surgery had been performed more often in patients presenting with pulmonary embolism than in other patients (33.3% vs. 18.5%, p <0,05). Factor V Leiden was present in 9% of the patients presenting with pulmonary embolism (relative risk: 3.3 95% Cl: 1.0-10.6) and 17% of the patients presenting with deep-vein thrombosis (relative risk: 6.9 95% Cl: 3.6-12.8). The prevalence of factor V Leiden was intermediate in patients with both clinical characteristics. Conclusion. These data suggest that patients with venous thromboembolism have different clinical presentation depending on the risk factor profile. Factor V Leiden may preferentially lead to manifest deep-vein thrombosis. Differences in structure of venous thrombi could underlie differences in embolic tendency.


2016 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
MonaH.A. Yaman ◽  
MohamedM Elwageh ◽  
AmiraY Abd-Elnaby ◽  
ManalA.W. Eid

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document