scholarly journals Improving image quality with model-based iterative reconstruction at quarter of nominal dose in upper abdominal CT

2018 ◽  
pp. 20180137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xirong Zhang ◽  
Jing Chen ◽  
Nan Yu ◽  
Zhanli Ren ◽  
Qian Tian ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 4016-4025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gautier Laurent ◽  
Nicolas Villani ◽  
Gabriela Hossu ◽  
Aymeric Rauch ◽  
Alain Noël ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. e275-e283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongjun Jia ◽  
Bingying Zhai ◽  
Taiping He ◽  
Yong Yu ◽  
Nan Yu ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 2464-2473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bharti Kataria ◽  
Jonas Nilsson Althén ◽  
Örjan Smedby ◽  
Anders Persson ◽  
Hannibal Sökjer ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 740-747
Author(s):  
Marie-Louise Aurumskjöld ◽  
Marcus Söderberg ◽  
Fredrik Stålhammar ◽  
Kristina Vult von Steyern ◽  
Anders Tingberg ◽  
...  

Background In pediatric patients, computed tomography (CT) is important in the medical chain of diagnosing and monitoring various diseases. Because children are more radiosensitive than adults, they require minimal radiation exposure. One way to achieve this goal is to implement new technical solutions, like iterative reconstruction. Purpose To evaluate the potential of a new, iterative, model-based method for reconstructing (IMR) pediatric abdominal CT at a low radiation dose and determine whether it maintains or improves image quality, compared to the current reconstruction method. Material and Methods Forty pediatric patients underwent abdominal CT. Twenty patients were examined with the standard dose settings and 20 patients were examined with a 32% lower radiation dose. Images from the standard examination were reconstructed with a hybrid iterative reconstruction method (iDose4), and images from the low-dose examinations were reconstructed with both iDose4 and IMR. Image quality was evaluated subjectively by three observers, according to modified EU image quality criteria, and evaluated objectively based on the noise observed in liver images. Results Visual grading characteristics analyses showed no difference in image quality between the standard dose examination reconstructed with iDose4 and the low dose examination reconstructed with IMR. IMR showed lower image noise in the liver compared to iDose4 images. Inter- and intra-observer variance was low: the intraclass coefficient was 0.66 (95% confidence interval = 0.60–0.71) for the three observers. Conclusion IMR provided image quality equivalent or superior to the standard iDose4 method for evaluating pediatric abdominal CT, even with a 32% dose reduction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document