scholarly journals Brazilian Review of Finance 2015 Editorial Report

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Marcio Poletti Laurini

RBFin is the main Brazilian publication outlet of academic papers about finance. Using the Open Journals System to manage the editorial process, publication of RBFin adheres to a strict publication schedule. The journal is indexed by EconLit, RedALyC, Proquest, Google Scholar, Gale and Ebsco and is listed in the JEL, DOAJ, Latindex, OpenJGate, and Cabell’s directories. RBFin is rated B2 in the business and economics areas of the Brazilian classification system. The editorial board undergoes partial turnover every year and comprises 19 individuals from four countries, the Brazilian members being affiliated with universities in five different Brazilian states. The acceptance rate was 44\% for papers submitted in 2015. The average number of days between receipt and first decision for articles submitted in 2015 was 86. The average number of days between receipt and final decision for articles submitted in 2015 was 104. The worst case was 345 days. Thirty five individuals served as reviewers in 2015.

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ricardo Pereira Câmara Leal

RBFin is the main Brazilian publication outlet of academic papers about finance. The contents of the Review are open and online; a printed version was maintained, in part, thanks to a grant from CNPq/CAPES. Using the Open Journals System to manage the editorial process, publication of RBFin adheres to a strict publication schedule. The journal is indexed by EconLit, Google Scholar, Gale and Ebsco and is listed in the JEL, DOAJ, Latindex, OpenJGate, and Cabell's directories. It will soon appear in RedALyC and Proquest. RBFin is rated B1 in the business area of the Brazilian classification system. The editorial board undergoes partial turnover every year and comprises 18 individuals from four countries, the Brazilian members being affiliated with universities in five different Brazilian states. The acceptance rate was 18% for papers submitted in 2011, the most recent year in which all submissions have already received a final decision. The average number of days between receipt and acceptance for articles submitted in 2012 was 215. The worst case was 584 days. The average number of days between receipt and publication was 317. The worst case was 760 days. Sixty-three individuals served as reviewers in 2012.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Marcio Poletti Laurini

RBFin is the main Brazilian publication outlet of academic papers about finance. Using the Open Journals System to manage the editorial process, publication of RBFin adheres to a strict publication schedule. The journal is indexed by EconLit, RedALyC, Proquest, Google Scholar, Gale and Ebsco and is listed in the JEL, DOAJ, Latindex, OpenJGate, and Cabell’s directories. RBFin is rated B1 in the business and economics areas of the Brazilian classification system. The editorial board undergoes partial turnover every year and comprises 19 individuals from four countries, the Brazilian members being affiliated with universities in five different Brazilian states. The acceptance rate was 53% for the 2016 year. The average number of days between receipt and first decision for articles submitted in 2016 was 185. The average number of days between receipt and final decision for articles submitted in 2016 was 192. The worst case was 459 days. Twenty-nine individuals served as reviewers in 2017.


2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ricardo Pereira Câmara Leal

RBFin is the main Brazilian publication outlet of academic papers about finance. The contents of the Review are open and online; a printed version is maintained, in part, thanks to a grant from CNPq/CAPES. Using the Open Journals System to manage the editorial process, publication of RBFin adheres to a strict publication schedule. The journal is indexed by EconLit, Google Scholar, DOAJ, Gale and Ebsco and is listed in the JEL, Latindex, OpenJGate, and Cabell's directories. RBFin is rated B1 in the business area of the Brazilian classification system. The editorial board undergoes partial turnover every year and comprises 18 individuals from four countries, the Brazilian members being affiliated with universities in five different Brazilian states. The acceptance rate was 30% for papers submitted in 2010, the most recent year in which all submissions have already received a final decision. The average number of days between receipt and acceptance for all articles published in 2011 was 266. The worst case was 462 days. The average number of days between receipt and publication was 432. The worst case was 599 days. The average number of hits per article as of January 2012 was 1,249. Sixty-four individuals served as reviewers in 2011.


2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Marcio Poletti Laurini

RBFin is the main Brazilian publication outlet of academic papers about finance. Using the Open Journals System to manage the editorial process, publication of RBFin adheres to a strict publication schedule. The journal is indexed by EconLit, RedALyC, Proquest, Google Scholar, Gale and Ebsco and is listed in the JEL, DOAJ, Latindex, OpenJGate, and Cabell’s directories. RBFin is rated B1 in the business and economics areas of the Brazilian classification system. The editorial board undergoes partial turnover every year and comprises 19 individuals from four countries, the Brazilian members being affiliated with universities in five different Brazilian states. The acceptance rate was 43% for the 2016 year. The average number of days between receipt and first decision for articles submitted in 2016 was 143. The average number of days between receipt and final decision for articles submitted in 2016 was 154. The worst case was 381 days. Twenty-nine individuals served as reviewers in 2016.


2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Ricardo Pereira Câmara Leal

RBFin is the main Brazilian publication outlet of academic papers about finance. The contents of the Review are open and online with a printed version distributed to members of the Brazilian Finance Society. Using the Open Journals System to manage the editorial process, publication of RBFin adheres to a strict publication schedule. The Review is indexed by EconLit, RedALyC, Google Scholar, Gale, Proquest and Ebsco and is listed in the JEL, DOAJ, Latindex, OpenJGate, and Cabell's directories. RBFin is rated B1 in the business area of the Brazilian classification system and B2 in Economics. The editorial board undergoes partial turnover every year and comprises 19 individuals from four countries, the Brazilian members being affiliated with universities in five different Brazilian states. The acceptance rate was 27% for papers submitted in 2012, the most recent year in which all submissions have already received a final decision. The average number of days between receipt and acceptance for articles submitted in 2013 was 203. The worst case was 361 days. The average number of days between receipt and publication was 294. The worst case was 575 days. Fifty-three individuals served as reviewers in 2013.


2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ricardo Pereira Câmara Leal

RBFin is the main publication outlet for academic papers on finance in Brazil. The contents of the Review are open and online; a printed version is maintained, in part, thanks to a grant from CNPq/CAPES. Using the Open Journals System to manage the editorial process, publication of RBFin adheres to a strict publication schedule. The journal is indexed by EconLit, Google Scholar, DOJA, Gale and Ebsco and is listed in the JEL, Latindex, and Cabell's directories. RBFin is rated B1 in the business area of the Brazilian classification system. The editorial board undergoes partial turnover every year and comprises 18 individuals from five countries, the Brazilian members being affiliated with universities in five different Brazilian states. The acceptance rate was 22.9% for papers submitted in 2009 and 19.7% for 2010. The average number of days between receipt and acceptance for all articles published in 2010 was 215. The worst case was 525 days. The average number of days between receipt and publication was 367. The worst case was 649 days. The average number of hits per article as of January 2011 was 1027. In 2010, 117 individuals served as reviewers.


2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ricardo Pereira Câmara Leal

The contents of the Journal remained open and online and its printed version has been maintained. Among the main actions in 2009 are the increase in the number of issues per year of 3 to 4, allowing the publication of at least 20 articles per year. The schedule of publication of RBFin is strictly up to date. The journal is indexed in EconLit, Google Scholar, Ebsco and Gale and listed in the JEL, Latindex and Cabell's directories. The Editorial Board is partially renewed each year and consists of 18 members from five countries. The acceptance rate was 41% for the articles received in 2008 and 26.5% for those received in 2009. The average number of days between receipt and acceptance for articles published in 2009 was 210. The worst case was 552 days. The average number of days between receipt and publication was 352. The worst case was 641 days. The average of hits per article until January 2010 was 750. Eighty-seven individuals have served as reviewers in 2009. (Full article available in Portuguese only)


2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-2

We are delighted to present Volume 24 (Issue1) in May 2021. The COVID pandemic rages on in several parts of the globe, particularly in India at the time of writing. We wish our authors, reviewers, and readers to remain safe and healthy as we come out of this global pandemic. For American Business Review (ABR), it is a matter of great pride and satisfaction that since our relaunch in 2020, we have received over 300 manuscripts and have about a 10% acceptance rate. Our editorial board members come from all continents and have active Google Scholar profiles and have published in A/A* journals in their disciplines. We try to restrict the number of reviews to two per year per reviewer to reduce the burden of review work. In addition, we seek to invite additional reviewers who are domain experts in the subject of the submission received.


2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalai Mathee ◽  
Hilary F. Logan ◽  
Norman K. Fry

The Journal of Medical Microbiology has a global presence with an international Editorial Board. Asian countries such as PR China, India and Iran are prolific in the submission of manuscripts. Overall, the acceptance rate has been highest for European countries, the USA, Canada and Australia, and lowest for African, Asian and Latin American (LATAM) countries. The creation of regional Editors to assist the authors from these countries would serve the scientific community.


PMLA ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 130 (3) ◽  
pp. 534-535

PMLA welcomes essays of interest to those concerned with the study of language and literature. As the publication of a large and heterogeneous association, the journal is receptive to a variety of topics, whether general or specific, and to all scholarly methods and theoretical perspectives. The ideal PMLA essay exemplifies the best of its kind, whatever the kind; addresses a significant problem; draws out clearly the implications of its findings; and engages the attention of its audience through a concise, readable presentation. Manuscripts in languages other than English are accepted for review but must be accompanied by a detailed summary in English (generally of 1,000-1,500 words) and must be translated into English if they are recommended to the Editorial Board. Articles of fewer than 2,500 words or more than 9,000 words are not considered for publication. The word count includes notes but excludes works-cited lists and translations, which should accompany foreign language quotations. The MLA urges its contributors to be sensitive to the social implications of language and to seek wording free of discriminatory overtones.Only members of the association may submit articles to PMLA. For a collaboratively written essay to be eligible for submission, all coauthors must be members of the MLA. PMLA does not publish book reviews or new works of fiction, nor does it accept articles that were previously published in any language. An article is considered previously published if it appears in print or in an online outlet with the traits of publication, such as editorial selection of content, a formal presentation, and ongoing availability. Online contexts that typically lack these traits include personal Web pages, discussion groups, and repositories. Each article submitted is sent to two reviewers, usually one consultant reader and one member of the Advisory Committee. Articles recommended by these readers are then sent to the members of the Editorial Board, who meet periodically with the editor to make final decisions. Until a final decision is reached, the author's name is not made known to consultant readers, to members of the Advisory Committee and the Editorial Board, or to the editor. Because the submission of an article simultaneously to more than one refereed journal can result in duplication of the demanding task of reviewing the manuscript, it is PMLA's policy not to review articles that are under consideration by other journals. An article found to have been simultaneously submitted elsewhere will not be published in PMLA even if it has already been accepted for publication by the Editorial Board.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document