scholarly journals Comparison of genetic variability among anther-derived and ovule-derived doubled haploid lines of tobacco.

1985 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi KUMASHIRO ◽  
Tadao OINUMA
1978 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 929-933 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. REINBERGS ◽  
L. S. P. SONG ◽  
T. M. CHOO ◽  
K. J. KASHA

The effect of complete homozygosity and homogeneity on stability of grain yield in barley was studied in 38 doubled haploid lines derived from F1 plants of six biparental crosses. The number of doubled haploid lines in each cross ranged from 3 to 12. These along with 13 check cultivars were evaluated at five locations in Ontario in 1975 and 1976. The linear regression method proposed by Eberhart and Russell in 1966 was used to analyze the stability of grain yield. In general, the response of doubled haploid lines to different environments, based upon the regression coefficient, did not differ from the response of the check cultivars. Similar responses were also observed among check cultivars, among crosses, and among doubled haploid lines within crosses. Furthermore, the pooled deviation from regression mean squares for the check cultivars was not different from that for the doubled haploid lines. The mean yield of the doubled haploid lines was as high as that of the check cultivars. Significant differences in mean yield among crosses was not detectable but considerable genetic variability in grain yield was found among lines within three of the crosses. It appears that under Ontario conditions homogeneous and homozygous lines derived by the doubled haploid method are as good agronomically and have yields as stable as the licensed cultivars developed by conventional breeding methods.


Author(s):  
Mohammad Syafii ◽  
Bambang Sapta Purwoko ◽  
Iswari Saraswati Dewi ◽  
Dan Willy Bayuardi Suwarno

<p><em></em><em>Anther culture is useful tool in rice breeding. The technique shortens the time to obtain full homozygous plant in just one generation. Information related to genetic variability among the regenerants is important for further analysis including selection activities. The objective of this study was to analyze agronomic character variability and yield potential among doubled-haploid lines (DH0) derived from anther culture. This study was carried out in Center for Agricultural Biotechnology and Genetic Resources Research and Development (BB Biogen) from October 2016 to February 2017. The experiment was arranged in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Forty eight doubled haploid lines derived from anther culture and three check varieties were evaluated. The results showed high genetic variability as well as broad sense heritability (more than 90%) for all variables tested. Several lines showed superior agronomic characters compared to check (Ciherang, Inpari 18, Inpago 10). Anther culture could generate high genetic variability for further selection.<br /><br />Keywords: anther culture, broad sense heritability, haploid technology</em></p>


1980 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
PIERRE TURCOTTE ◽  
C. A. ST-PIERRE ◽  
KEH MING HO

Pedigree and doubled haploid lines from seven crosses of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) were compared over 2 years. The lines were tested, in a randomized complete block design, in row plots at Ste-Foy in 1977 and in hill plots at Brawley, California in 1978. There are significant differences between the two methods of pure line production for grain yield, 1000-kernel weight, plant height, resistance to lodging and date of maturity. Furthermore, these significant differences between doubled haploid and pedigree lines seem to be tied to wide crosses. After showing that doubled haploids are superior for resistance to lodging, we conclude that the use of doubled haploid lines must be seriously considered in a barley breeding program on the basis of improved selection efficiency and the short time required to get homozygous lines.


1989 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. S. Baenziger ◽  
D. M. Wesenberg ◽  
V. M. Smail ◽  
W. L. Alexander ◽  
G. W. Schaeffer

Author(s):  
Kourosh Vahdati ◽  
Mohammad Sadat-Hosseini ◽  
Pedro Martínez-Gómez ◽  
Maria Antonietta Germanà

2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B. M. Showkath Babu ◽  
H. C. Lohithaswa ◽  
N. Mallikarjuna ◽  
Anand Pandravada ◽  
D. C. Balasundara

Crop Science ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 1448-1456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Toorchi ◽  
H. E. Shashidhar ◽  
T. M. Gireesha ◽  
Shailaja Hittalmani

Crop Science ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1737-1743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Frégeau‐Reid ◽  
Thin‐Meiw Choo ◽  
Keh‐Ming Ho ◽  
Richard A. Martin ◽  
Takeo Konishi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document