scholarly journals Probabilistic Analysis of Rumor-Spreading Time

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 172-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yves Mocquard ◽  
Bruno Sericola ◽  
Emmanuelle Anceaume
10.37236/4314 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Panagiotou ◽  
Ali Pourmiri ◽  
Thomas Sauerwald

We consider the random phone call model introduced by Demers et al., which is a well-studied model for information dissemination on networks. One basic protocol in this model is the so-called Push protocol which proceeds in synchronous rounds. Starting with a single node which knows of a rumor, every informed node calls in each round a random neighbor and informs it of the rumor. The Push-Pull protocol works similarly, but additionally every uninformed node calls a random neighbor and may learn the rumor from it.It is well-known that both protocols need $\Theta(\log n)$ rounds to spread a rumor on a complete network with $n$ nodes. Here we are interested in how much the spread can be speeded by enabling nodes to make more than one call in each round. We propose a new model where the number of calls of a node is chosen independently according to a probability distribution $R$. We provide both lower and upper bounds on the rumor spreading time depending on statistical properties of $R$ such as the mean or the variance (if they exist). In particular, if $R$ follows a power law distribution with exponent $\beta \in (2,3)$, we show that the Push-Pull protocol spreads a rumor in $\Theta(\log \log n)$ rounds. Moreover when $\beta=3$, the Push-Pull protocol spreads a rumor in $\Theta(\frac{ \log n}{\log\log n})$ rounds.


Author(s):  
Timothy McGrew

The mid-20th century consensus regarding Hume’s critique of reported miracles has broken down dramatically in recent years thanks to the application of probabilistic analysis to the issue and the rediscovery of its history. Progress from this point forward is likely to be made along one or more of three fronts. There is wide room for interdisciplinary collaboration, work that will bring together scholars with expertise in religion, psychology, philosophy, and empirical science. There is a great deal of work still to be done in formal analysis, making use of the tools of modern probability theory to model questions about testimony and inference. And the recovery and study of earlier works on the subject—works that should never have been forgotten—can significantly enrich our understanding of the underlying issues.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document