scholarly journals Do Women Avoid Salary Negotiations? Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (9) ◽  
pp. 2016-2024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Leibbrandt ◽  
John A. List
2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (5) ◽  
pp. 1774-1793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean Karlan ◽  
John A List

We conducted a natural field experiment to further our understanding of the economics of charity. Using direct mail solicitations to over 50,000 prior donors of a nonprofit organization, we tested the effectiveness of a matching grant on charitable giving. We find that the match offer increases both the revenue per solicitation and the response rate. Larger match ratios (i.e., $3:$1 and $2:$1) relative to a smaller match ratio ($1:$1) had no additional impact, however. The results provide avenues for future empirical and theoretical work on charitable giving, cost-benefit analysis, and the private provision of public goods. (JEL D64, L31)


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Basil Halperin ◽  
Benjamin Ho ◽  
John A List ◽  
Ian Muir

Abstract We use a theory of apologies to design a nationwide field experiment involving 1.5 million Uber ridesharing consumers who experienced late rides. Several insights emerge: First, apologies are not a panacea – the efficacy of an apology and whether it may backfire depend on how the apology is made. Second, across treatments, money speaks louder than words – the best form of apology is to include a coupon for a future trip. Third, in some cases sending an apology is worse than sending nothing at all, particularly for repeated apologies and apologies that promise to do better. For firms, caveat venditor should be the rule when considering apologies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document