The NIEHS Superfund Research Program: Epidemiological Research to Address the Complexity of Environmental Exposures and Improve Public Health

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 2435
Author(s):  
Danielle J Carlin* ◽  
Sara E Mishamandani ◽  
Heather F Henry ◽  
Caroline H Dilworth ◽  
Michelle L Heacock ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 124 (6) ◽  
pp. 825-830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Fitzgerald ◽  
Daniel Wartenberg ◽  
W. Douglas Thompson ◽  
Allison Houston

Objectives. We inventoried and reviewed the birth and fetal death certificates of all 50 U.S. states to identify nonstandard data items that are environmentally relevant, inexpensive to collect, and might enhance environmental public health tracking. Methods. We obtained online or requested by mail or telephone the birth certificate and fetal death record forms or formats from each state. Every state data element was compared to the 2003 standards promulgated by the National Center for Health Statistics to identify any items that are not included on the standard. We then evaluated these items for their utility in environmentally related analyses. Results. We found three data fields of potential interest. First, although every state included residence of mother at time of delivery on the birth certificate, only four states collected information on how long the mother had lived there. This item may be useful in that it could be used to assess and reduce misclassification of environmental exposures among women during pregnancy. Second, we found that father's address was listed on the birth certificates of eight states. This data field may be useful for defining paternal environmental exposures, especially in cases where the parents do not live together. Third, parental occupation was listed on the birth certificates of 15 states and may be useful for defining parental workplace exposures. Our findings were similar for fetal death records. Conclusion. If these data elements are accurate and well-reported, their addition to birth, fetal death, and other health records may aid in environmental public health tracking.


Author(s):  
Olav Meirik

AbstractThe advantages and limitations of national registers containing individual identification numbers in clinical epidemiological research are reviewed. The author concludes that such registers are very valuable for epidemiological research and for formulation of research questions of public health importance.


2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 35-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather F. Henry ◽  
William A. Suk

Abstract Innovative devices and tools for exposure assessment and remediation play an integral role in preventing exposure to hazardous substances. New solutions for detecting and remediating organic, inorganic, and mixtures of contaminants can improve public health as a means of primary prevention. Using a public health prevention model, detection and remediation technologies contribute to primary prevention as tools to identify areas of high risk (e.g. contamination hotspots), to recognize hazards (bioassay tests), and to prevent exposure through contaminant cleanups. Primary prevention success is ultimately governed by the widespread acceptance of the prevention tool. And, in like fashion, detection and remediation technologies must convey technical and sustainability advantages to be adopted for use. Hence, sustainability – economic, environmental, and societal – drives innovation in detection and remediation technology. The National Institute of Health (NIH) National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) Superfund Research Program (SRP) is mandated to advance innovative detection, remediation, and toxicity screening technology development through grants to universities and small businesses. SRP recognizes the importance of fast, accurate, robust, and advanced detection technologies that allow for portable real-time, on-site characterization, monitoring, and assessment of contaminant concentration and/or toxicity. Advances in non-targeted screening, biological-based assays, passive sampling devices (PSDs), sophisticated modeling approaches, and precision-based analytical tools are making it easier to quickly identify hazardous “hotspots” and, therefore, prevent exposures. Innovation in sustainable remediation uses a variety of approaches: in situ remediation; harnessing the natural catalytic properties of biological processes (such as bioremediation and phytotechnologies); and application of novel materials science (such as nanotechnology, advanced membranes, new carbon materials, and materials reuse). Collectively, the investment in new technologies shows promise to reduce the amount and toxicity of hazardous substances in the environment. This manuscript highlights SRP funded innovative devices and tools for exposure assessment and remediation of organic, inorganic, and mixtures of contaminants with a particular focus on sustainable technologies.


2004 ◽  
Vol 79 (9) ◽  
pp. 1110-1112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Iademarco ◽  
Deborah Sodt ◽  
Wendy Mills Sutherland

2015 ◽  
Vol 123 (10) ◽  
pp. 909-918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip J. Landrigan ◽  
Robert O. Wright ◽  
Jose F. Cordero ◽  
David L. Eaton ◽  
Bernard D. Goldstein ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document