scholarly journals Immediate Improvement in Severe Mitral Regurgitation After Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Insufficiency

Aorta ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 04 (03) ◽  
pp. 91-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Zeeshan ◽  
Mojun Zhu ◽  
John Elefteriades
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Aortic Insufficiency ◽  
Functional Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Severe Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Severe Aortic Regurgitation ◽  
Aortic Replacement

AbstractA 57-year-old male with ascending aortic aneurysm, severe aortic regurgitation, and severe mitral regurgitation (MR) underwent ascending aortic replacement and aortic valve replacement. MR in this patient with normal mitral valve morphology was considered secondary to aortic valve incompetency. Consequently, a surgical approach to restore aortic valve function was adopted with successful MR resolution. This case report demonstrates the possibility of reversing early functional mitral regurgitation without surgically approaching the mitral valve.

Abstract 121: Improvement in Functional Mitral Regurgitation After Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Insufficiency

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Griffin Boll ◽  
Frederick Y Chen
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Aortic Insufficiency ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Functional Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Reverse Remodeling ◽  
Lv Remodeling

Objective: Aortic insufficiency (AI) can lead to left ventricular (LV) remodeling characterized by dilation and increased LV mass. This remodeling can cause altered mitral valve coaptation and functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). While there is growing evidence that aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis promotes sufficient ventricular reverse remodeling that FMR improves or resolves, this effect is not well characterized for patients with AI. Methods: All cases of AVR for AI that were performed at a single center between January 2003 and December 2015 were reviewed. Cases with any concomitant procedures, any degree of aortic stenosis, any evidence of ischemic etiology, absence of mitral regurgitation, or significant primary mitral pathology were excluded from analysis. The primary outcome was change in FMR after isolated AVR. Secondary outcomes included change in LV ejection fraction (EF), left atrial (LA) dimension, and change in end-diastolic and –systolic LV dimensions. Two-tailed paired t-test was used to evaluate for difference between the two time points. Results: Over the course of 13.4 years, 31 cases of isolated aortic valve replacement for pure aortic insufficiency with concurrent functional mitral regurgitation were identified. 54.8% (17/31) of cases had some evidence of bacteremia or aortic vegetations at time of surgery, with 41.9% (13/31) of cases completed urgently. Postoperatively, FMR was improved in 74.2% (23/31) of the patients, and decreased by a mean 1.0 ± 0.8 grades (1.6 ± 0.8 vs 0.6 ± 0.7, p < 0.001). There was no significant change in LV EF (50.5 ± 13.4 vs. 50.2 ± 12.9, p = 0.892) or LA dimension (42.5 ± 7.2 vs 40.7 ± 5.9, p = 0.341), but there were significant reductions in the dimension of the LV at end-diastole (56.7 ± 7.1 vs 47.7 ± 8.5, p < 0.001) and end-systole (38.5 ± 9.7 vs 34.0 ± 8.3, p = 0.011). Conclusions: Significant reduction in ventricular size and subsequent improvement in functional mitral regurgitation is expected after isolated aortic valve replacement for pure aortic insufficiency.

Transaortic Edge-To-Edge Repair for Functional Mitral Regurgitation during Aortic Valve Replacement: A 13-Year Experience

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 425-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos G. Mihos ◽  
Maiteder Larrauri-Reyes ◽  
Judy Hung ◽  
Orlando Santana
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Functional Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
The Mean

Objective The study evaluated the feasibility of a transaortic edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (Alfieri stitch) for moderate or greater (≥2+) functional mitral regurgitation (MR) in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 40 consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve replacement combined with a transaortic edge-to-edge mitral valve repair for 2+ or greater functional MR, between February 2002 and April 2015. The MR was graded semiquantitatively as 0 (trace/none), mild moderate (2+), or moderate to severe (3–4+). Results Thirty-two patients had aortic stenosis, and eight had aortic regurgitation. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) age was 77.5 ± 5 years, 34 (85%) were male, and the mean ± SD EuroSCORE II was 14.3% ± 12.9. At a median follow-up of 1 month (interquartile range, 0.75–10), there were significant improvements in preoperative versus postoperative median MR grade (3+ vs 1+, P < 0.001), mean left ventricular ejection fraction (34% vs 41%, P = 0.018), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (54 vs 49 mm, P = 0.005), and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (49 vs 35 mm Hg, P < 0.001). Persistent 3 to 4+ MR occurred in two patients (5%). In 12 patients with at least 6-month follow-up (mean ± SD, 18 ± 11 months), a sustained improvement in all echocardiographic parameters was observed, with persistent 3 to 4+ MR occurring in one patient (8.3%). Actuarial survival at 1, 3, and 4.5 years was 82% ± 6, 71% ± 8, and 65% ± 10, respectively. Conclusions A transaortic edge-to-edge repair for 2+ or greater functional MR can be safely performed during aortic valve replacement and is associated with improvements in MR grade, left ventricular remodeling, and pulmonary hemodynamics.

P1786Impact of surgery for mitral regurgitation at the time of aortic valve replacement

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Kato ◽  
J J Thaden ◽  
W R Miranda ◽  
M E Sarano ◽  
K L Greason ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Mitral Valve Surgery ◽  
Functional Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Functional mitral regurgitation (MR) is expected to improve after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (sAS) and MR. However, little is unknown about the impact of AVR on organic MR and whether concomitant mitral valve surgery (MVS) improves outcomes in patients with sAS and MR. Purpose We assessed the impact of AVR on MR severity according to MR mechanism. We also assessed the clinical outcomes in patients with sAS and MR that underwent AVR with vs without MVS. Methods We retrospectively investigated patients who received surgical AVR or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) from 2008 to 2017. We identified patients with effective mitral regurgitant orifice area (ERO) ≥10 mm2 by the proximal isovelocity surface area method with transthoracic echocardiography. The change in MR after AVR was considered significant when there was at least one grade difference. We compared the all-cause mortality of patients with sAS and MR that underwent AVR with vs without MVS according to MR mechanism and patient age. Results We included 326 patients with sAS and MR (age 80 [Interquartile range 72–85] years, 53% male, 21% history of myocardial infarction). Organic and functional MR were present in 69% and 31%, respectively. Of these, 240 underwent AVR alone (AVR group) including TAVI in 112 while 86 underwent AVR and MVS (MVS group) including mitral valve replacement in 38 and mitral valve repair in 48. The median ERO at baseline was 17 (14–21) mm2 in AVR and 24 (19–33) mm2 in MVS (p<0.001). Improvement in MR was observed in 58% of AVR and 91% of MVS (p<0.001). In AVR group, organic MR improved as frequently as functional MR (58% vs. 59%, p=0.96). Predictors for improvement in organic MR were absence of atrial fibrillation and moderate or greater MR, and in functional MR, the only predictor was decrease in LV end-systolic diameter after AVR. During mean follow-up of 2.4±2.3 years, moderate or greater MR was observed in 23% of AVR and 7% of MVS (p=0.002). All-cause mortality was similar in AVR and MVS groups for organic and functional MR (hazard ratio for MVS group 0.68, 95% CI: 0.40–1.10, p=0.13 in organic MR and 0.62, 95% CI 0.29–1.22, p=0.68 in functional MR). All-cause mortality was lower in MVS group compared with AVR group in patients <80 years, and was similar in patients ≥80 years (Figure). Conclusion In patients with sAS and MR, MR improves after AVR, even in the majority of patients with organic MR. Compared with isolated AVR, concomitant MVS was associated with better prognosis in patients <80 years.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document