Advances in general surgery 50 years ago

Author(s):  
Harold Ellis

In 1971, some of the new advances that were set to change the field of general surgery included theories about the development of peptic ulcers, new treatments for varicose veins and pioneering work in the introduction of day case surgery.

1987 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.C. Berridge ◽  
G.S. Makin

One hundred and forty-eight patients (164 limbs) who had varicose vein surgery by the same consultant surgeon 3–10 years previously were reviewed; 61 patients had surgery as an in-patient and 87 as a day-case. The patients were reviewed to assess the efficacy and acceptability of day-case varicose vein surgery. There were no significant differences between the age and sex ratios of the patients. However, twice as many operations in the in-patient group included stripping of the long saphenous vein above the knee (χ2 = 4.2, P = 0.04). Fifteen in-patients had bilateral vein surgery as opposed to only one day-case patient. Fifteen patients suffered complications most of which were minor and were evenly distributed including wound infections (nine), reactionary haemorrhage/haematoma (four), deep vein thrombosis (one) and pulmonary embolus (one). The convalescent period before returning to work was similar in the two groups (U= 953, P= 0.28). The mean duration of stay for the in-patients was 3.9 ± 2.2 days. There was no significant difference in the period off work (day-case: 3.6 ± 2.0 weeks; in-patient: 4 ± 2.9 weeks), or in the length of follow-up (day-case: 6.01 ± 1.24 years; in-patient: 6.79 ± 1.71 years). In the period before review 11 patients in the in-patient group and 13 patients in the day-case group had further surgery or sclerotherapy for recurrent symptomatic varicose veins. At review five patients in the in-patient group and six patients in the day-case group had recurrent sapheno-femoral incompetence (χ2 = 0.1, P = 0.7). A total of 34 patients in both groups had recurrent varicose veins. Only four (4.6%) of the day-case patients expressed a preference for in-patient treatment if they were to have further surgery and 21 (34%) of the in-patient group would prefer day-case surgery. Day-case varicose vein surgery has not been shown to be inferior in terms of complications or recurrence rate. Patient acceptability is good and it is a viable alternative to in-patient treatment in suitable patients in areas with adequate district nurse facilities.


1991 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 223-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Price ◽  
G. S. Makin

A methodology is described to calculate the cost of day-case surgery at University Hospital, Nottingham during 1988/89, which may be suitable for use elsewhere. Day-case surgery for varicose veins is cheaper than the corresponding inpatient surgery.


1993 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. C. Onuma ◽  
P. E. Bearn ◽  
U. Khan ◽  
P. Mallucci ◽  
M. Adiseshiah

Objective: To assess the efficacy of locoregional anaesthesia and non-opiate analgesia in controlling pain after varicose vein surgery. To examine patient attitudes to day case surgery for this condition. Design: Prospective single patient group study (22 consecutive patients). Setting: University College Hospital (Teaching Hospital). Intervention: Locoregional and general anaesthesia. Non-opiate analgesia. Surgical treatment for varicose Main outcome measures: Patient interview, pain scores, analgesia requirement. Result: Post operative Pain was absent in 36% during the first 24 hours. Oral analgesia was given to 36% as inpatients but only 18% after discharge. Before surgery, 95% would have preferred DCS but only 24% at six months. The after-effects of general anaesthesia was the main reason for this change in attitude. Conclusions: Patients would like day case surgery for varicose veins but anaesthesia and analgesia must be satisfactory.


1987 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. M. Weightman ◽  
M. Zacharias

Thiopentone and propofol were used for the induction and maintenance of anaesthesia in unpremedicated patients undergoing minor gynaecological procedures. There were no significant differences in the induction and maintenance characteristics except for a high incidence of pain on injection and a greater fall in the mean systolic blood pressure associated with propofol in comparison with thiopentone. Propofol was associated with a quicker early recovery as well as a faster psychomotor recovery, as tested by a peg-board. However, complete psychomotor recovery was not achieved for up to three hours in some patients receiving propofol and so caution is advised regarding the early street fitness of patients receiving repeated doses of the drug for day case surgery.


2017 ◽  
Vol 132 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Morris ◽  
E Hassin ◽  
M Borschmann

AbstractObjective:The safety of day-case tonsillectomy is widely documented in the literature; however, there are no evidence-based guidelines recommending patient characteristics that are incompatible with day-case tonsillectomy. This study aimed to identify which patients should be considered unsafe for day-case tonsillectomy based on the likelihood of needing critical intervention.Method:Retrospective review of 2863 tonsillectomy procedures performed at University Hospital Geelong from 1998 to 2014.Results:Of the patients, 7.81 per cent suffered a post-tonsillectomy complication and 4.15 per cent required intervention. The most serious complications, haemorrhage requiring a return to the operating theatre and airway compromise, occurred in 0.56 per cent and 0.11 per cent of patients respectively. The following patient characteristics were significantly associated with poorer outcomes: age of two years or less (p < 0.01), tonsillectomy indicated for neoplasm (p < 0.01) and quinsy (p < 0.05).Conclusion:The authors believe that all elective tonsillectomy patients should be considered for day-case surgery, with the following criteria necessitating overnight observation: age of two years or less; an indication for tonsillectomy of neoplasm or quinsy; and an American Society of Anesthesia score of more than 2.


1984 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.E. CRAWFORD ◽  
P. CARL ◽  
R.S. ANDERSEN ◽  
B.O. MIKKELSEN

1990 ◽  
Vol 28 (21) ◽  
pp. 81-82

Many patients now have surgery as day cases, being admitted and discharged from hospital on the day of the operation; most have a general anaesthestic (GA). Serious complications are rare if day case surgery is confined to short, minor procedures in fit patients. However, both the patient and the GP need to be aware of the complications of anaesthesia which may arise after discharge from hospital. A future article will discuss other aspects of day case surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document