067 Finite Element Analysis of Head and Cervical Spine Injury Mechanisms for Launch Abort Systems

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015.28 (0) ◽  
pp. _067-1_-_067-2_
Author(s):  
Akihiro Ueda ◽  
Keiichiro Fujimoto ◽  
Shunsuke Imaizumi ◽  
Asuka Hatano ◽  
Satoshi Izumi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Cervical Spine Injury ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Injury Mechanisms

A New Computer Simulation of Neck Injury Biomechanics

2011 ◽  
Vol 467-469 ◽  
pp. 339-344
Author(s):  
Na Li ◽  
Jian Xin Liu
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Traffic Accidents ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Human Head ◽  
Element Model ◽  
Neck Injury ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Injury Mechanisms

Head and neck injuries are the most frequent severe injury resulting from traffic accidents. Neck injury mechanisms are difficult to study experimentally due to the variety of impact conditions involved, as well as ethical issues, such as the use of human cadavers and animals. Finite element analysis is a comprehensive computer aided mathematical method through which human head and neck impact tolerance can be investigated. Detailed cervical spine models are necessary to better understand cervical spine response to loading, improve our understanding of injury mechanisms, and specifically for predicting occupant response and injury in auto crash scenarios. The focus of this study was to develop a C1–C2 finite element model with optimized mechanical parameter. The most advanced material data available were then incorporated using appropriate nonlinear constitutive models to provide accurate predictions of response at physiological levels of loading. This optimization method was the first utilized in biomechanics understanding, the C1–C2 model forms the basis for the development of a full cervical spine model. Future studies will focus on tissue-level injury prediction and dynamic response.

The Influence of End Condition on Human Cervical Spine Injury Mechanisms

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger W. Nightingale ◽  
Brian J. Doherty ◽  
Barry S. Myers ◽  
James H. McElhaney ◽  
William J. Richardson
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Cervical Spine Injury ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Injury Mechanisms

Biomechanics of a posture-controlling cervical artificial disc: mechanical, in vitro, and finite-element analysis

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. E11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil R. Crawford ◽  
Jeffery D. Arnett ◽  
Joshua A. Butters ◽  
Lisa A. Ferrara ◽  
Nikhil Kulkarni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Postural Control ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Computer Modeling ◽  
Mechanical Testing ◽  
Artificial Disc ◽  
Element Analysis

Different methods have been described by numerous investigators for experimentally assessing the kinematics of cervical artificial discs. However, in addition to understanding how artificial discs affect range of motion, it is also clinically relevant to understand how artificial discs affect segmental posture. The purpose of this paper is to describe novel considerations and methods for experimentally assessing cervical spine postural control in the laboratory. These methods, which include mechanical testing, cadaveric testing, and computer modeling studies, are applied in comparing postural biomechanics of a novel postural control arthroplasty (PCA) device versus standard ball-and-socket (BS) and ball-in-trough (BT) arthroplasty devices. The overall body of evidence from this group of tests supports the conclusion that the PCA device does control posture to a particular lordotic position, whereas BS and BT devices move freely through their ranges of motion.

INFLUENCE OF THE CONSTITUTIVE MATERIAL BEHAVIOR MODEL ASSIGNED TO THE ANNULUS FIBROSUS AND THE NUCLEUS PULPOSUS ON THE BIOMECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF A MODEL OF THE CERVICAL SPINE: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS STUDY

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 151-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
YUAN LI ◽  
GLADIUS LEWIS
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Annulus Fibrosus ◽  
Constitutive Models ◽  
Material Behavior ◽  
Elastic Behavior ◽  
Behavior Model ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Constitutive Material

One feature of the literature on finite element analysis of models of cervical spine segment(s) is that an assortment of constitutive models has been used for the elastic behavior of the annulus fibrosus (AF) and the nucleus pulposus (NF). The extent to which the model assigned to each of these tissues affects the values of the biomechanical parameters of interest of the model is lacking. This issue was the subject of the present study. We used a three-dimensional solid model of the C4–C6 motion segment units (which comprised the vertebral bodies, the bony posterior elements (transverse processes, pedicles, laminae, spinous processes, and facet joints), the intervertebral discs (IVDs), the endplates, and the five major ligaments) and eight combinations of constitutive models. It was found that (1) the influence of the constitutive material models used depended on the tissue considered, with some, such as the posterior endplate of C5 and the cancellous bone of C6, showing marked sensitivity, while others, such as the cancellous bone of C4 and the cortical bone of C5, were moderately affected; and (2) the biomechanical performance of the spine model is more sensitive to the material behavior model used for the AF than it is to that used for the NF. These results suggest that experimental and computational efforts expended in obtaining the most appropriate constitutive model for the elastic behavior of the two parts of the IVD, in particular the AF, are justified.

scholarly journals Finite Element Analysis and Comparative Study of 4 Kinds of Internal Fixation Systems for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Children

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
ziyu li ◽  
Jianqiang Zhou ◽  
Zhijun Li ◽  
Shaojie Zhang ◽  
xing wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Finite Element Model ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Element Model ◽  
Lower Cervical Spine ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Internal Fixation System ◽  
Fixation System

Abstract Background: Spinal injury in children usually occurs in the cervical spine region. Anterior fixation of lower cervical spine has been applied in the treatment of pediatric cervical spine injury and disease due to its stable and firm mechanical properties. This study performed finite element analysis and comparison of 4 different anterior cervical internal fixation systems for children, and explored more stable methods of anterior cervical internal fixation in children. Methods: A finite element model of 6-year-old children with lower cervical spine C4/5 discectomy was established, and the self-designed lower cervical spine anterior locking internal fixation system ACBLP and the children’s anterior cervical internal fixation system ACOP, ACVLP, ACSLP plate screws were fixed and loaded on the model. 27.42N•m torque load was applied to each internal fixation model under 6 working conditions of anteflexion, backward flexion, left flexion, right flexion, left rotation and right rotation, to simulate the movement of the cervical spine. The activity and stress distribution cloud diagram of each finite element model was obtained. Results: In the four internal fixation models of ACOP, ACVLP, ACSLP, and ACBLP, the mobility of C4/5 segment basically showed a decreasing relationship, and the mobility of adjacent segments increased significantly. In the Mises stress cloud diagram of the cervical spine of the four models, the vertebral body and accessories of the ACBLP model born the least stress, followed by ACSLP; The steel plate and screws in the ACVLP internal fixation model were the most stressed; The stress of the internal fixation system (plate/screw) in all models increased in the order of ACBLP, ACSLP, ACVLP, and ACOP.Conclusions: ACBLP internal fixation system had obvious advantages in anterior internal fixation of lower cervical spine in children, C4/5 had the smallest degree of movement, relative displacement was minimal, the stress on the pedicle was the least while the stress on the plate screw was relatively the smallest.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document