305 Boundary-Layer Transition on a Swept Wing in Ground Effect

2009 ◽  
Vol 2009.45 (0) ◽  
pp. 81-82
Author(s):  
Takuma KATO ◽  
Yuichiro SAIKI ◽  
Yoshihiro YAMAGUCHI ◽  
Toshiyuki ARIMA ◽  
Yasuaki KOHAMA
2008 ◽  
Vol 2008.44 (0) ◽  
pp. 91-92
Author(s):  
Yuichiro Saiki ◽  
Yoshihiro Yamaguchi ◽  
Toshiyuki Arima ◽  
Takuma Kato ◽  
Yasuaki Kohama

2017 ◽  
Vol 139 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke S. Roberts ◽  
Mark V. Finnis ◽  
Kevin Knowles

The transition from a laminar to turbulent boundary layer on a wing operating at low Reynolds numbers can have a large effect on its aerodynamic performance. For a wing operating in ground effect, where very low pressures and large pressure gradients are common, the effect is even greater. A study was conducted into the effect of forcing boundary-layer transition on the suction surface of an inverted GA(W)-1 section single-element wing in ground effect, which is representative of a racing-car front wing. Transition to a turbulent boundary layer was forced at varying chordwise locations and compared to the free-transition case using experimental and computational methods. Forcing transition caused the laminar-separation bubble, which was the unforced transition mechanism, to be eliminated in all cases and trailing-edge separation to occur instead. The aerodynamic forces produced by the wing with trailing-edge separation were shown to be dependent on trip location. As the trip was moved upstream the separation point also moved upstream, this led to an increase in drag and reduction in downforce. In addition to significant changes to the pressure field around the wing, turbulent energy in the wake was considerably reduced by forcing transition. The differences between free- and forced-transition wings were shown to be significant, highlighting the importance of modeling transition for ground-effect wings. Additionally, it has been shown that while it is possible to reproduce the force coefficient of a higher Reynolds-number case by forcing the boundary layer to a turbulent state, the flow features, both on-surface and off-surface, are not recreated.


AIAA Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 267-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenna L. Eppink ◽  
Richard W. Wlezien ◽  
Rudolph A. King ◽  
Meelan Choudhari

1996 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1202-1204 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Lombardi ◽  
M. Morelli ◽  
D. Waller

1999 ◽  
Vol 399 ◽  
pp. 85-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
MUJEEB R. MALIK ◽  
FEI LI ◽  
MEELAN M. CHOUDHARI ◽  
CHAU-LYAN CHANG

Crossflow instability of a three-dimensional boundary layer is a common cause of transition in swept-wing flows. The boundary-layer flow modified by the presence of finite-amplitude crossflow modes is susceptible to high-frequency secondary instabilities, which are believed to harbinger the onset of transition. The role of secondary instability in transition prediction is theoretically examined for the recent swept-wing experimental data by Reibert et al. (1996). Exploiting the experimental observation that the underlying three-dimensional boundary layer is convectively unstable, non-linear parabolized stability equations are used to compute a new basic state for the secondary instability analysis based on a two-dimensional eigenvalue approach. The predicted evolution of stationary crossflow vortices is in close agreement with the experimental data. The suppression of naturally dominant crossflow modes by artificial roughness distribution at a subcritical spacing is also confirmed. The analysis reveals a number of secondary instability modes belonging to two basic families which, in some sense, are akin to the ‘horseshoe’ and ‘sinuous’ modes of the Görtler vortex problem. The frequency range of the secondary instability is consistent with that measured in earlier experiments by Kohama et al. (1991), as is the overall growth of the secondary instability mode prior to the onset of transition (e.g. Kohama et al. 1996). Results indicate that the N-factor correlation based on secondary instability growth rates may yield a more robust criterion for transition onset prediction in comparison with an absolute amplitude criterion that is based on primary instability alone.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document